AIf we assuminge that a magic pill that stops you from needing to eat has been invented and could even beis effective, I would question myself about my relationship with food and how much it could change. If we assume that a magic pill that stops you from needing to eat has been invented and is effective, I would question my relationship with food and how much it could change.

In a dystopian reality, taking this drug would represent the annihilation of a primal necessity: Hhunting (or the equivalent of doing our grocery). In a dystopian reality, taking this drug would represent the annihilation of a primal necessity: hunting (or the equivalent of doing our grocery).

Avoiding the need to eat, theour entire economy collapses. Avoiding the need to eat, our entire economy collapses.

The original is fine, but I think "our" fits the flow a bit better, since you mentioned your personal relationship with food earlier on.

Avoiding the need to eat, the entire economy would collapses. Avoiding the need to eat, the entire economy would collapse.

No one maywould need to buy their milk, pasta, or, in general, bring home theirly buy weekly groceries at all. No one would need to buy milk, pasta, or generally buy weekly groceries at all.

No one maywould need to buy their milk, pasta, or, in general, bring home their weekly groceries. No one would need to buy their milk, pasta, or, in general, bring home their weekly groceries.

In fact, from the beginning, eating represents a social behaviourhas fulfilled an important social function. In fact, from the beginning, eating has fulfilled an important social function.

In fact, from the beginning of time, eating has represents aed social behaviours. In fact, from the beginning of time, eating has represented social behaviours.

ThaIt is a matter of fact that any animal species observed in their natural habitat meets to eat in groups. It is a matter of fact that any animal species observed in their natural habitat meets to eat in groups.

We would always say it as "It is a matter of fact", we don't ever say "That is a matter of fact" like this. :)

That it is a matter of fact that any animal species observed in their natural habitat meets to eat in groups. That it is a matter of fact that any animal species observed in their natural habitat meets to eat in groups.

Thate pill would change our social connections for the worse, causing us to avoid socialitysing and to become more and more isolated. The pill would change our social connections for the worse, causing us to avoid socialising and to become more and more isolated.

On the other hand, lots of harmful industries might be stoppedforced to shut down, and intensive factory farms would be demolished. On the other hand, lots of harmful industries might be forced to shut down, and intensive factory farms would be demolished.

In addition, aAvoiding animals suffering for our needs would be a really good consequbenefit of the pill's existence. Avoiding animals suffering for our needs would be a really good benefit of the pill's existence.

We would usually use "in addition" to name another point that's completely separate. This sentence carries on from the last one, so we can just start it at 'Avoiding'. Also, "consequence" usually implies a bad result. "Benefit" would work well here. :)

ProbablyI think I mostly appreciate eating with my family or my fiancèé due to enjoying their company that they bring everyday, reather the food itself. I think I mostly appreciate eating with my family or my fiancé due to enjoying their company everyday, rather the food itself.

Probably I mostly appreciate eating with my family or my fiancè due to the company that they bring everyday, reather the food itself. Probably I mostly appreciate eating with my family or my fiancè due to the company that they bring everyday, rather the food itself.

However , I would be worried about a world where people could avoid eating for entire days. However, I would be worried about a world where people could avoid eating for entire days.