May 22, 2020
I believe they cannot fully understand other people's pain, for two reasons. First, though it seems that human beings can empathize to others, every single creature, including human being, naturally think about themselves first. So they are just trying to learn what others think, and it is far from understanding it. Second, if you were able to find out what people are feeling, there would be no problem in the world, because they would guess what others or enemies think, and they would not be able to disagree with them, let alone attack them.
(This is a problem of the 2011 entrance exam of Tokyo Uni.)
Is it possible to understand other people's pain?
I believe theyone cannot fully understand other people's pain, for two reasons.
I believe one cannot fully understand other people's pain, for two reasons.
They is incorrect here because we don't know who 'they' are. 'One' is better here. It refers to mankind/people in general. One could also use 'we' as well.
First, though it seems that human beings can empathize to with one anothers , every single creature, including human beings, naturally think about themselvesitself first.
First, though it seems that human beings can empathize with one another , every single creature, including human beings, naturally think about itself first.
So t They are just trying to learn what others think, and it is far fromeven they don't really understanding it.
They are just trying to learn what others think, and even they don't really understand.
What you wrote was grammatically fine but just isn't the way we say that in English
Second, if you were able to find out what people are feeling, there would be no problems in the world, because theyyou would guess what others or enemies think, and theyyou would not be able to disagree with them, let alone attack them.
Second, if you were able to find out what people are feeling, there would be no problems in the world, because you would guess what others or enemies think, and you would not be able to disagree with them, let alone attack them.
(This is a problem of thequestion on Tokyo Uni's 2011 entrance exam of Tokyo Uni.)
(This is a question on Tokyo Uni's 2011 entrance exam .)
Is it possible to understand other people's pain?
I believe theyone cannot fully understand other people's pain, for two reasons.
I believe one cannot fully understand other people's pain, for two reasons.
Referring to unspecified people, in a general sense, "one" is usually best.
First, though it seems that human beings can empathize towith others, every singleall creatures, including human beings, naturally think about themselves first.
First, though it seems that human beings can empathize with others, all creatures, including human beings, naturally think about themselves first.
The singular "it" could also work, grammatically speaking, but with the next sentence, "they" is better.
So while they are just trying to learn what others think, and it isthey are far from understanding it.
So while they are trying to learn what others think, they are far from understanding it.
These conjunctions makes more sense to me with the previous sentence.
Second, if you were able to find out what people are feelingfelt, there would be no problem in the world, because they would guessknow what others o, even their enemies, think, and they would not be able to disagree with them, let alone attack them.
Second, if you were able to find out what people felt, there would be no problem in the world, because they would know what others, even their enemies, think, and they would not be able to disagree with them, let alone attack them.
(This is a problemquestion ofn the 2011 entrance exam of Tokyo Uni.)
(This is a question on the 2011 entrance exam of Tokyo Uni.)
"Problem" is more for quantitative questions, like "math problems," "chemistry problems," and "physics problems."
Is it possible to understand other people's pain?
I believe that peopley cannot fully understand other people's' pain, for two reasons.
I believe that people cannot fully understand others' pain for two reasons.
First, though it may seems that human beings can empathize towith others, every single creature, including human being,all creatures naturally think about themselves first.
First, though it may seem that human beings can empathize with others, all creatures naturally think about themselves first.
So they areThey just trying to learn what others think, and it isare far from understanding ithem.
They just try to learn what others think, and are far from understanding them.
Second, if you wereone was able to find out what peopleknow what others are feeling, there would be no problems in the world, because theyone would guessknow what others oose people, who might even be their enemies, think, and they. As a result, one would not be able to disagree with them, let alone attack them.
Second, if one was able to know what others are feeling, there would be no problems in the world, because one would know what those people, who might even be their enemies, think. As a result, one would not be able to disagree with them, let alone attack them.
(This is a problem of thefrom Tokyo University's 2011 entrance exam of Tokyo Uni.)
(This is a problem from Tokyo University's 2011 entrance exam.)
Is it possible to understand other people's pain?
I believe that peopley cannot fully understand other people's pain, for two reasons.
I believe that people cannot fully understand other people's pain, for two reasons.
Generally, one should write the subject in the first sentence, even though the response answers the title/question. This is because when someone writes "they", the subject has already been mentioned before in the response. Putting "they" in the first sentence, rather than "people", makes it vague.
First, although it seems that human beings can empathize to others, every single humans and creatures, including human being,people naturally think about themselves first.
First, although it seems that human beings can empathize to other humans and creatures, people naturally think about themselves first.
SoUltimately, they are just trying to learn what others think, and it is far fromrather than understanding it.
Ultimately, they are just trying to learn what others think, rather than understanding it.
"And it is far" sounds a bit unnatural.
Second, if youpeople were able to find out what people aothers were feeling, there would be no problems in the world, because they would guess what others or enemiesare think,ing and they would not be able to disagree with them, let alone attack them.
Second, if people were able to find out what others were feeling, there would be no problems in the world because they would guess what others are thinking and would not be able to disagree with them, let alone attack them.
(This is a problem ofrom the 2011 entrance exam of Tokyo Uni.)
(This is a problem from the 2011 entrance exam of Tokyo Uni.)
Feedback
Good job with your text!
|
Is it possible to understand other people's pain? This sentence has been marked as perfect! This sentence has been marked as perfect! This sentence has been marked as perfect! This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
I believe they cannot fully understand other people's pain, for two reasons.
I believe that people Generally, one should write the subject in the first sentence, even though the response answers the title/question. This is because when someone writes "they", the subject has already been mentioned before in the response. Putting "they" in the first sentence, rather than "people", makes it vague.
I believe that people
I believe Referring to unspecified people, in a general sense, "one" is usually best.
I believe They is incorrect here because we don't know who 'they' are. 'One' is better here. It refers to mankind/people in general. One could also use 'we' as well. |
|
First, though it seems that human beings can empathize to others, every single creature, including human being, naturally think about themselves first.
First, although it seems that human beings can empathize to other
First, though it may seem
First, though it seems that human beings can empathize The singular "it" could also work, grammatically speaking, but with the next sentence, "they" is better.
First, though it seems that human beings can empathize |
|
So they are just trying to learn what others think, and it is far from understanding it.
"And it is far" sounds a bit unnatural.
So while they are These conjunctions makes more sense to me with the previous sentence.
What you wrote was grammatically fine but just isn't the way we say that in English |
|
Second, if you were able to find out what people are feeling, there would be no problem in the world, because they would guess what others or enemies think, and they would not be able to disagree with them, let alone attack them.
Second, if
Second, if
Second, if you were able to find out what people
Second, if you were able to find out what people are feeling, there would be no problems in the world, because |
|
(This is a problem of the 2011 entrance exam of Tokyo Uni.)
(This is a problem
(This is a problem
(This is a "Problem" is more for quantitative questions, like "math problems," "chemistry problems," and "physics problems."
(This is a |
You need LangCorrect Premium to access this feature.
Go Premium