Where Aare my Ssocks? Where are my socks?

No need for capitals. Sometimes capitals are used for titles, but it doesn't seem right here.

At home I have a drawer where I put all the socks that hasve lost their pair. At home I have a drawer where I put all the socks that have lost their pair.

At home I have a drawer where I put all the socks that hasve lost their pair. At home I have a drawer where I put all the socks that have lost their pair.

At home I have a drawer where I put all the socks that hasve lost their pairmates. At home I have a drawer where I put all the socks that have lost their mates.

"socks" is plural, so use "have" rather than "has". "Pair" would usually refer to both socks, you would say that each individual sock is missing its mate.

Now there are seven socks and all are differents. Now there are seven socks and all are different.

Now there are seven socks and all are differents. Now there are seven socks and all are different.

Now there are seven socks and all are differents. Now there are seven socks and all are different.

Unlike Spanish, adjectives in English do not match the noun for singular/plural

Everythink areThey are all very darks; o. One is black, others have diamonds, orsome have lines in colours, blacks, greys or greens. They are all very dark. One is black, others have diamonds, some have lines in colours, blacks, greys or greens.

Color is correct American spelling. Colour in English spelling.

Everythink are sock is very darks; one is black, others have diamonds, or lines in colors blacks, greys or greens. Every sock is very dark; one is black, others have diamonds, or lines in colors blacks, greys or greens.

Adjectives don't change even if they're describing many things: The car is red. The cars are red. One million cars are red.

EverythinkAll of them are very darks; one is black, other have diamonds, or lines in colors such as blacks, greys or greens. All of them are very dark; one is black, other have diamonds, or lines in colors such as black, grey or green.

"Everythink" was a typo for "everything", however in this context "all of them" clarifies that you are still just talking about the socks. "Everything" might imply a broader context. Once again, the adjectives (the individual colors in this case) are not pluralized.

Where are gonhave the other missing socks gone? Where have the other missing socks gone?

Where are gone the other missing socks? Where are the other missing socks?

Alternatively: "Where have the other missing socks gone?"

Where are gonhave the other missing socks gone? Where have the other socks gone?

I think: if I lose a sock in the dirty clothing basket, in the next washed should appeart should appear in the next wash. I think: if I lose a sock in the dirty clothing basket, it should appear in the next wash.

I think if I lose a sock in the dirty clothing basket, in the next washed it should appear. I think if I lose a sock in the dirty clothing basket, in the next wash it should appear.

I think if I lose a sock in the dirty clothing basket, in the next washed should appeart should appear in the next load of laundry. I think if I lose a sock in the dirty clothing basket, it should appear in the next load of laundry.

AlsoOr could be they be behind of the washing machine. Or could they be behind the washing machine.

Also could be they behind of the washing machine. Also could be they behind the washing machine.

Also, they could be they behind of the washing machine. Also, they could be behind the washing machine.

The subject "they" needs to come before the verb phrase "could be". "Behind" does not usually require a preposition such as "of". Also, you will usually set aside "also" from the rest of the sentence with a comma.

But not, I looked in the clothing basket and into the sides of the washing machine and I doidn't find anything. But no, I looked in the clothing basket and to the sides of the washing machine and I didn't find anything.

But not, I look in the clothing basket and ion the sides of washing machine and I don't find anything. But no, I look in the clothing basket and on the sides of washing machine and I don't find anything.

But not, I look in the clothing basket and in the sides of washing machine and I don't find anything. But no, I look in the clothing basket and in the sides of washing machine and I don't find anything.

I am starting to think toI will wear the single socks, and it doesn't matter that be inthey will be different colours. I am starting to think I will wear the single socks, and it doesn't matter that they will be different colours.

Color / colour again.

I am starting to think tof wearing the single socks, doit doesn't matter that be inthey're different colors. I am starting to think of wearing the single socks, it doesn't matter that they're different colors.

I am starting to think I should justo wear the singleunmatched socks,. It doesn't matter that be inthey are different colors. I am starting to think I should just wear the unmatched socks. It doesn't matter that they are different colors.

When thinking about a course of action, you can say "I think I will do this" or "I think I should do this" or "I think I might do this", but not "I think to do this." However, just because our language is confusing, you can use that formation in the negative, especially in the past tense - ex. "I didn't think to do that".

No, I will do not , but ... where are my socks? No, I will not, but... where are my socks?

No, I will do not do that, but ... where are my socks? No, I will not do that, but... where are my socks?

Elipses (...) only have a space on one side: I was thinking yesterday...

No, I will do not , but ... where are my socks? No, I will not, but ... where are my socks?

You could say "No I will not do that", but the simpler approach is just "No, I will not." (It's clear from context what you won't do.) However you can't put the "do" in-between the "will" and "not".