Probably almost all40 or 50 years ago, most Japanese people probably learned that from their Englsish textbooks 40 or 50 years ago. 40 or 50 years ago, most Japanese people probably learned that from their English textbooks.

I think what you wanted to say is that long ago this “dialogue” was taught to students in Japan. If so, the above is a clearer way to describe that. Beginning with “40 to 50…” sets up that the events you’re about to describe took place routinely in the past. As originally written, it sounds like a mass event where all Japanese people learned this. Placement of “probably” changes the meaning. “Probably almost all” is redundant as “probably” weakens the word it describes as does “almost all.” Moving it to “probably learned” adds uncertainty about whether that was taught or not at that time.

Probably almost all Japanese people learned that from their Englsish textbooks 40 or 50 years ago. Probably almost all Japanese people learned that from their English textbooks.

Probably almost all Japanese people learned that from their Englsish textbooks 40 or 50 years ago. Probably almost all Japanese people learned that from their English textbooks 40 or 50 years ago.

Probably aAlmost all Japanese people probably learned that from their Englsish textbooks 40 or 50 years ago. Almost all Japanese people probably learned that from their English textbooks 40 or 50 years ago.

Nowadays, some native English speakers who are ALT (assistant language teacher) in Japan said that they'd gotten bored to hearing that answer. Nowadays, some native English speakers who are ALT (assistant language teacher) in Japan said that they'd gotten bored hearing that answer.

Nowadays, some native English speakers who are ALTs (assistant language teacher) in Japan said that they'd gotten bored to hear that answer. Nowadays, some native English speakers who are ALTs (assistant language teacher) in Japan said that they'd gotten bored to hear that answer.

Nowadays, some native English speakers who are ALT (assistant language teachers) in Japan said that they'd gotten bored to hear that answer. Nowadays, some native English speakers who are ALT (assistant language teachers) in Japan said that they'd gotten bored to hear that answer.

Add "s" because the word should conjugate correctly, even when it's in parenthesis.

Nowadays, some native English speakers who are ALTs (assistant language teachers) in Japan said that they'dve gotten botired tof hearing that answer. Nowadays, some native English speakers who are ALTs (assistant language teachers) in Japan said that they've gotten tired of hearing that answer.

They wanted changes, and. For example, when you weare not fine, because of getting cold or something, you should not answer, "I'm fine." They wanted changes. For example, when you are not fine, because of getting cold or something, you should not answer, "I'm fine."

They wanted changes, and when you were not fine because of getting cold or something, you should not answer "I'm fine."more variation , and have grown tired of "I'm fine" responses. They wanted more variation , and have grown tired of "I'm fine" responses.

They wanted changes, and; when you were not fine because of getting cold or something, you should not just answer "I'm fine." They wanted change; when you were not fine because of getting cold or something, you should not just answer "I'm fine."

Changes --> change (it's also a noun!) Add a semicolon in replacement for the conjunction "and". Add "just" because it implies that the answer that English language learners usually provide is insufficient.

They wanted changessay that there should be variety, and when you weare not fine because of gettingyou got a cold or something, you should not answer "I'm fine." They say that there should be variety, and when you are not fine because you got a cold or something, you should not answer "I'm fine."

However, Dr. Vance, who is a linguist at Yeale University and hiswhose wife is Japanese who used to be anand a former international flight attendant, said in his book that in business English conversations, you should always answer, "I'm fine." However, Dr. Vance, who is a linguist at Yale University and whose wife is Japanese and a former international flight attendant, said in his book that in business English conversations, you should always answer, "I'm fine."

However, Dr. Vance who is a linguist at Ye (aYale University linguistand his wife is Japanese who used to be an international flight attendant) said in his book that in business English conversations, you should always answer "I'm fine." However, Dr. Vance (aYale University linguistand his wife is Japanese who used to be an international flight attendant) said in his book that in business English conversations, you should always answer "I'm fine."

NOTE: If the person you are speaking to is honestly not knowing you, then a superficial "I'm fine" is fine. Sometimes superficial and perfunctory responses are okay when *not* speaking with genuine friends.

However, Dr. Vance who is a linguist at Yeale University and hiswhose wife is Japanese whoand used to be an international flight attendant said in his book that in business English conversations in a business setting, you should always answer "I'm fine." However, Dr. Vance who is a linguist at Yale University whose wife is Japanese and used to be an international flight attendant said in his book that in English conversations in a business setting, you should always answer "I'm fine."

However, Dr. Vance who is, a linguist at Yeale University, and his wife is Japanese who used to be anife, a former international flight attendant, said in histheir book that in business English conversations, you should always answer with "I'm fine." However, Dr. Vance, a linguist at Yale University, and his Japanese wife, a former international flight attendant, said in their book that in business English conversations you should always answer with "I'm fine."

If you said somethingreplied that you were not fine because you had a cold, you would be recognizconsidered as a weird person, and your business would fail your business. If you replied that you were not fine because you had a cold, you would be considered a weird person and your business would fail.

If you said something that you were not fine because you had a cold, perhaps you would be recognized as a weird person, and you would fail your business. If you said something that you were not fine because you had a cold, perhaps you would be recognized as a weird person, and you would fail your business.

This is an over-generalization.

If you said something that you were not fine because you had a cold, you would be recognizedseen as a weird person, and you would fail your business. If you said that you were not fine because you had a cold, you would be seen as a weird person, and you would fail your business.

"Fail your business" sounds weird, what are you trying to say?

If you said something that you were not fine because you had a cold, you would be recognizedseen as a weird person, and your business would fail your business. If you said something that you were not fine because you had a cold, you would be seen as a weird person, and your business would fail.

Everything depends on its context, background(,) and situations. Everything depends on its context, background(,) and situations.

The Oxford comma is a controversial stylistic choice. I personally prefer to use it. However, some argue it’s not necessary.

Everything depends on its context, background, and the situations. Everything depends on context, background, and the situation.

In this entry, I discovered what the cause of the subungual hematomas on my both pinky toe nails after running a full marathon was. In this entry, I discovered what the cause of the subungal hematomas on my both pinky toe nails after running a full marathon was.

In this entry, I wrote about what I discovered whatregarding the cause of the subungual hematoma on my boththe nails of both of my pinky toe nails after running a full marathon was. In this entry, I wrote about what I discovered regarding the cause of the subungual hematoma on the nails of both of my pinky toes after running a full marathon.

I dihadn't experienced that injury in a marathon before. I hadn't experienced that injury in a marathon before.

I didhaven't experienced that injury in a marathon before. I haven't experienced that injury in a marathon before.

I didn't experienced that injury in a marathon before. I didn't experience that injury in a marathon before.

However, I got it after I changed my socks to five-toe socks which had awere highly recommendation for marathon runners in many books orand websites. However, I got it after I changed my socks to five-toe socks which were highly recommendation for marathon runners in many books and websites.

However, I got it after I changed my socks to five-toe socks, which had aare highly recommendationed for marathon runners inby many books orand websites. However, I got it after I changed my socks to five-toe socks, which are highly recommended for marathon runners by many books and websites.

Everything Has the OppositeDiffering Opinions or Pros & Cones Are Inherent to Everything Differing Opinions or Pros & Cons Are Inherent to Everything

Everything Has theIts Opposite Opinion orand Pros & Cones Everything Has Its Opposite and Pros & Cons

COMPARE: cones → 円錐やコーンズ cons →　短所やコンズ

Everything Has theits Opposite Opinion or Pros & Cones Everything Has its Opposite Opinion or Pros & Cones

Everything Has the Opposite Opinion orone Has a Different Opinion and Everything Has Pros &and Cones Everyone Has a Different Opinion and Everything Has Pros and Cons

I’m sorry for the lengthy entry again, but I believe you can improve "the ratio" muchgreatly when you correct this entry. I’m sorry for the lengthy entry again, but I believe you can improve "the ratio" greatly when you correct this entry.

I’m sSorry for the lengthy entry again, but I believe you can improve "theyour correction ratio" much when youby correcting this entry. Sorry for the lengthy entry, but I believe you can improve "your correction ratio" much by correcting this entry.

I’m sorry for the lengthy entry again, but I believe you can improve "theyour ratio" muchby a lot when you correct this entry. I’m sorry for the lengthy entry again, but I believe you can improve "your ratio" by a lot when you correct this entry.

I’m sorry for the lengthy entry again, but I believe you can improve "theyour ratio" much when a lot if you correct this entry. I’m sorry for the lengthy entry again, but I believe you can improve your ratio a lot if you correct this entry.

People always have differing opinions on various topics. For example: , I learned that the typical answer to the question (or greeting), "hHow are you?" People always have differing opinions on various topics. For example, I learned that the typical answer to the question (or greeting), "How are you?"

You don’t want to lead with “for example” because it’s coming out of nowhere. Midway into a paragraph, you could use this to introduce the example of something you’ve just described.

For example: I learned that the typical answerresponse to the question (or greeting), "hHow are you?" For example: I learned that the typical response to the question (or greeting), "How are you?"

For example: I learned that the typical answer to the question (or greeting), "how are you?" I learned that the typical answer to the question (or greeting), "how are you?"

Remove for "for example". Use "for example" only when you intend on elaborating on a previous sentence with the next one, which you don't seem to be doing (if you are, I'm sorry - I didn't catch the meaning)

is "I'm fine. is "I'm fine.

They complaimned that the is response pattern answer was monot goodonous and non-communicative. They complained that this response answer was monotonous and non-communicative.

monotonous →　退屈

They claimed that the one pattern answerhrase was not good. They claimed that one phrase was not good.

"one pattern answer" can be shortened for conciseness. Also, you can change "good" to something else - shoot your shot.

They claimed that the one patternsuch a formulaic answer wais not good. They claim that such a formulaic answer is not good.

The socks made my toes wider and helped stabilize their grip to the ground. The socks made my toes wider and helped stabilize their grip to the ground.

The socks made my toes wider and stabilize thed my grip to the ground. The socks made my toes wider and stabilized my grip to the ground.

Conjugated "stabilized" in its past tense to agree with "made" which is also past tense.

The socks made my toes wallow toes to spread out and provider and stabilize thle grip to the ground. The socks allow toes to spread out and provide a stable grip to the ground.

However, in my case the socks are the cause of the damage to my pinky towes damagefrom pressing against the shoes' wall. However, in my case the socks are the cause of the damage to my pinky toes from pressing against the shoes' wall.

However, in my case the socks are the cause of me pinky towe's damage against the shoes's wall. However, in my case the socks are the cause of me pinky toe's damage against the shoe's wall.

However, in my case, the socks awere the cause ofcausing damage to my pinky tows damages against the shoes' wallwalls of my shoes. However, in my case, the socks were causing damage to my piny toes against the walls of my shoes.

Every thing has its pros and cones. Everything has its pros and cons.

Every thing has its pros and cones. Everything has its pros and cons.

Every thing has its pros and cones. Everything has its pros and cons.