ronpei's avatar
ronpei

July 17, 2024

0
“Sous La Saine”

The other day, I watched a video, titled “Sous La Saine” offered by Netflix. My French teacher advised me to watch it, so I signed in Netflix. The video, which features a shark swimming around the river Saine, was a kind of horror movie, and I was scared to watch it. The huge and ferocious shark, after having gotten evolved, attacked a lot of people, including even a woman from an Animal protection organization. She was an enthusiastic activist protesting against the massacres of shark by humans. It’s quite ironical that she herself ended up being killed by a shark. The most hellish scenes were on the Triathlon venue at the Paris Olympic in the last of the film. The players were attacked by sharks one after another, and the armed forces fired against sharks, leading to explosions caused by unexploded shells that had sunk in the bottm of the Saine. Then, a big tsunami gulped everything through the city. What a hell! What do the film producers think just before the 2024 Summer Olympics in Paris?


先日、Netflix で配信されている「Sous La Saine」というビデオを観た。フランス語の先生に勧められて、Netflix に登録した。セーヌ川をサメが泳ぎまわるというこのビデオは、一種のホラー映画で、見ていて怖かった。進化を遂げた巨大で凶暴なサメが多くの人を襲い、中には動物愛護団体の女性もいた。彼女は人間によるサメの大量殺戮に抗議する熱心な活動家だった。彼女自身がサメに殺されるなんて皮肉だ。最も地獄のようなシーンは、映画の最後のパリオリンピックのトライアスロン会場だ。選手たちが次々とサメに襲われ、軍隊がサメに発砲し、セーヌ川の底に沈んだ不発弾が爆発。そして大津波が街を飲み込んでしまう。なんて地獄なんだろう! 2024年パリ夏季オリンピックを前に、映画プロデューサーたちは何を考えているのか?

Corrections (4)
Correction Settings
Choose how corrections are organized

Only show inserted text
Word-level diffs are planned for a future update.

ronpei's avatar
ronpei

July 17, 2024

0

“Sous La Saine”

The video, which features a shark swimming around the river Saine, was a kind of horror movie, and I was scared to watch it.

ronpei's avatar
ronpei

July 17, 2024

0

“Sous La Saine”

Moonster_23's avatar
Moonster_23

July 17, 2024

0
ronpei's avatar
ronpei

July 17, 2024

0

The other day, I watched a video, titled “Sous La Saine” offered by Netflix.


The other day, I watched a video, titmovie, called “Sous La Saeine” offered byn Netflix. The other day, I watched a movie, called “Sous La Seine” on Netflix.

When it comes to a specific object where a more specific word exists. Try to use the more specific word. (Movie, Series, Episode). Offered and titled sound way too formal and intellectual. (Use it more in an essay).

The other day, I watched a video, titled “Sous La Saine” offered byn Netflix. The other day, I watched a video titled “Sous La Saine” on Netflix.

Using "offered" is correct but verrrry formal. One would watch something ON a streaming service.

The other day, I watched a video, titled “Sous La Saine” offered byn Netflix. The other day, I watched a video, titled “Sous La Saine” on Netflix.

What do the film producers think just before the 2024 Summer Olympics in Paris?


What doid the film producers think making this just before the 2024 Summer Olympics in Paris? What did the producers think making this just before the Summer Olympics?

Some of this information has already been said or can be assumed. You already said it was in paris, and with an event which is of such wide spread awareness, and is in close proximity, you dont need to mention the date. You would only mention the date if it was a previous or future olympics which is very far away. "Before the summer olympics" works fine because just about everybody knows there is about to be an olympic games and in Paris.

What doid the film producers think, just before the 2024 Summer Olympics in Paris? What did the film producers think, just before the 2024 Summer Olympics in Paris?

What do the film producers think just before the 2024 Summer Olympics in Paris? What do the film producers think just before the 2024 Summer Olympics in Paris?

Not sure what your meaning is here, but this doesn't make sense

What a hell!


What athe hell! What the hell!

What a hell isnt really said.... What the hell can be said. What the hell means (What the fuck, oh my god), showing shock and surprise. What a nightmare the word to be used in the way "what a hell" sounds like. = a bad dream, but can be used to express how bad a hypothetical situation would be.

What a hell! What hell!

What a helldisaster! What a disaster!

“Sous La Saine”


This sentence has been marked as perfect!

This sentence has been marked as perfect!

My French teacher advised me to watch it, so I signed in Netflix.


My French teacher advised me torecommended I watch it, so I signed inlogged onto Netflix. My French teacher recommended I watch it, so I logged onto Netflix.

Advise also sounds too formal. For past tense complete, logged onto is much better. I signed in kind of sounds liek you're still signed in, but you signed in in the past.

My French teacher advised me to watch it, so I signed in to/on to Netflix. My French teacher advised me to watch it, so I signed in to/on to Netflix.

My French teacher advised me to watch it, so I signed in Netflix., and watch My French teacher advised me to watch it, so I signed in Netflix, and watch

Continue the sentence with the next

My French teacher advised me to watch it, so I signed in to Netflix. My French teacher advised me to watch it, so I signed in to Netflix.

The video, which features a shark swimming around the river Saine, was a kind of horror movie, and I was scared to watch it.


The videofilm, which featuresd a shark swimming around the river SaineSeine river, was a kind of horror movie, and I was scared to watch it. The film, which featured a shark swimming around the Seine river, was a kind of horror movie, and I was scared to watch it.

This sentence has been marked as perfect!

Tthe video, which features a shark swimming around the river Saine, it was a kind of horror movie, and I was scared to watch it. the video, which features a shark swimming around the river Saine, it was a kind of horror movie, and I was scared to watch it.

The huge and ferocious shark, after having gotten evolved, attacked a lot of people, including even a woman from an Animal protection organization.


The huge and ferocious shark, after having gotten evolveding, attacked a lot ofmany people, even including even a woman from an Animal protection organization. The huge and ferocious shark, after evolving, attacked many people, even including a woman from an Animal protection organization.

The word" after" states that the action is definite, it means the action has the charactersitic of already being completed. Therefore, no more tense words such as "having" and "gotten" are needed, as the sentence already reads as if the action has been completed. a lot of people sounds a bit clunky in this sentence.

The huge and ferocious shark, after having gotten evolved, attacked a lot of people, including even a woman from an Aanimal protection organization. The huge and ferocious shark, after having evolved, attacked a lot of people, including a woman from an animal protection organization.

Because animal protection organization is not a proper noun, the a in animal would not be capitilized.

The huge and ferocious shark, after having gotten evolveding, attacked a lot of people, including even a woman from an Animal protection organization. The huge and ferocious shark, after evolving, attacked a lot of people, including even a woman from an Animal protection organization.

The huge and ferocious shark, after having gotten evolved, attacked a lot of people, including even a woman from an Animal protection organization. The huge and ferocious shark, after having gotten , attacked a lot of people, including even a woman from an Animal protection organization.

Not sure what your meaning is here, but evolved does not make sense.

She was an enthusiastic activist protesting against the massacres of shark by humans.


She was an enthusiastic activist who protestinged against thehumans massacres of shark by humans. She was an enthusiastic activist who protested against humans massacre of sharks.

"humans massacre of sharks" is said like a broad statement. "Humans" is said as if including all humans. You could almost remove the "humans" bit as well because it can sort of be already assumed that it is humans she is protesting against. It is not a regular thing for people to protest against another animals killing sharks, it would usually be humans. I hope this makes sense? The humans bit can usually be assumed within a "protesting" context. You would more specify the group if it was a specific set of people or group you want to say she was protesting against. "who protested against the fishing indisutries massacre of sharks." -> see how this is a more specific sub-group of people (humans).

She was an enthusiastic activist protesting against the massacres of sharks by humans. She was an enthusiastic activist protesting against the massacres of sharks by humans.

She was an enthusiastic activist protesting against the massacres of sharks by humans. She was an enthusiastic activist protesting against the massacre of sharks by humans.

She was an enthusiastic activist protesting against the massacres of sharks by humans. She was an enthusiastic activist protesting against the massacre of sharks by humans.

It’s quite ironical that she herself ended up being killed by a shark.


It’s was quite ironical that she herself ended up being killed by athe shark. It’s was quite ironic that she herself ended up being killed by the shark.

"A" shark infers it's a single shark, but from a larger group of sharks (Usually a very large group like a whole species in this case). THE shark implies it is more selective. From what i've read so far, it sounds like it is only one sharks. -> Correction it is a shark, but if you want to say "a shark" it needs to be implied already that there are multiple of its kind. From what i read up to here, it sounds like there is only one shark which has evolved, but in a couple lines it switches to saying there are many. Its confusing me a bit.

It’s quite ironical that she herself ended up being killed by a shark. It’s quite ironic that she herself ended up being killed by a shark.

It’s quite ironical that she herself ended up being killed by a shark. It’s quite ironical that she herself ended up being killed by a shark.

Yes it is.

It’s quite ironical that she herself ended up being killed by a shark. It’s quite ironic that she herself ended up being killed by a shark.

The most hellish scenes were on the Triathlon venue at the Paris Olympic in the last of the film.


The most hellish but last scenes were on the Triathlon venue at the Paris Olympics, in the last of the filtriathlon stadium. The most hellish but last scenes were at the Paris Olympics, in the triathlon stadium.

At is used for a general area, and in is more for specific location, like inside of a venue. At a venue could mean outside or inside the venue, just in its proximity. Try to give the broader details first, then the more specific ones after. Also i appologies but i cant understand whant you meant by "on"? If you meant on the roof of the triathalon stadium, it would be "on to of". May also be "above" if they were in the air. .... etc..... Just since youre trying to describe in detail the film, make sure to be more specific about the details you're describing. Stadium is more specific for this instance. Saying a venue is very broad. -> Stadium is bigger in scale than a regular venue.

The most hellish scenes were on the Ttriathlon venue at the Paris Olympic s during the lastend of the film. The most hellish scenes were on the triathlon venue at the Paris Olympics during the end of the film.

The most hellish scenes were on the Triathlon venue at the Paris Olympic intowards the lastend of the film. The most hellish scenes were on the Triathlon venue at the Paris Olympic towards the end of the film.

The players were attacked by sharks one after another, and the armed forces fired against sharks, leading to explosions caused by unexploded shells that had sunk in the bottm of the Saine.


The players wereathletes were being attacked by sharks one after another, andwhen the armed forces fired against sharks, leading to explosions caused byy began firing at them. It caused explosions from all the unexploded shells that had sunk into the bottom of the Saeine. The athletes were being attacked by sharks one after another, when the army began firing at them. It caused explosions from all the unexploded shells that had sunk to the bottom of the Seine.

Athletes is much more specific. A player can be anyone playing in a sport. Since it is in the Olympics, it is "Athletes" because theyre professionals. Here is where you mention there being multiple sharks -> please make sure the amount of it is introduced or kept consistent during your peice. "The sharks and one after another" both imply there are alot of sharks. You kind of need to include the tense of the sentence when you want to include another varible, in this case the army starting to shoot at them. This (the athletes were being attacked) was happening: when (the army started shooting at the sharks).

The playcharacters were attacked by sharks one after another, and the armed forces fired against the sharks, leading to explosions caused by unexploded shells that had sunk into the bottm of the Saine. The characters were attacked by sharks one after another, and the armed forces fired against the sharks, leading to explosions caused by unexploded shells that had sunk to the bottm of the Saine.

The players were attacked by sharks one after another, and the armed forces fired against the sharks, leading to explosions caused by unexploded shells that had sunk into the bottom of the Saine. The players were attacked by sharks one after another, and the armed forces fired against the sharks, leading to explosions caused by unexploded shells that had sunk to the bottom of the Saine.

Then, a big tsunami gulped everything through the city.


Then, a big tsunami gulpedswept up everything throughout the city. Then, a big tsunami swept up everything throughout the city.

Gulped is a bit too informal, in fact it dont think its said much if not at all. Throughout = through but including everthing in it.

Then, a big tsunami gulped everything through ththe entire city. Then, a big tsunami gulped the entire city.

Then, a big tsunami gulpflooded everything throughin the city. Then, a big tsunami flooded everything in the city.

You need LangCorrect Premium to access this feature.

Go Premium