The way this website works is new forto me The way this website works is new to me

Both can be correct; however, in this context, "new to me" is more fitting

The wWay tThis wWebsite wWorks is nNew for mto Me The Way This Website Works is New to Me

That's why we all arere all bound to correct posts that have already been corrected. That's why we are all bound to correct posts that have already been corrected.

That's why we all arere all bound to correct posts that have already been corrected. That's why we are all bound to correct posts that have already been corrected.

That's why we all are bound to correct posts that have already been corrected. That's why we all are bound to correct posts that have already been corrected.

That's why we all arere all bound to correct posts that have already been corrected. That's why we are all bound to correct posts that have already been corrected.

That's why we all are bound to correct posts that have already been corrected. That's why we all are bound to correct posts that have already been corrected.

This website is not the first one I've used to give and receive corrections for our writingtexts in a foreign language but the system that is used here to balance the tradinterchange of corrections between users is new for me. This website is not the first one I've used to give and receive corrections for texts in a foreign language but the system that is used here to balance the interchange of corrections between users is new for me.

"trade" feels slightly odd here, I'll be honest, I am not totally sure why. I think perhaps, outside of a commercial transaction ("I traded my iPhone for an Android") it has kind of negative connotations ("they traded blows for a while before the police arrived").

This website is not the first one I've used to give and receive corrections for our writing in a foreign language, but the system that is used here to balance the trade of corrections between users is new forto me. This website is not the first one I've used to give and receive corrections for writing in a foreign language, but the system that is used here to balance the trade of corrections between users is new to me.

This website is not the first one I've used to give and receive corrections for our writing in a foreign language but the system that is used here to balance the trade of corrections between users is new for me. This website is not the first one I've used to give and receive corrections for our writing in a foreign language but the system that is used here to balance the corrections between users is new for me.

Or maybe "balance the tradeoff of corrections"

This website is not the first one I've used to give and receive corrections for ourentries writingten in a foreign language, but the system that is used here to balance the tradgive-and-take of corrections between users is new for me. This website is not the first one I've used to give and receive corrections for entries written in a foreign language, but the system that is used here to balance the give-and-take of corrections between users is new for me.

This website is not the first one I've used to give and receive corrections for our writing in a foreign language, but the system that is used here to balance the trade of corrections between users is new for me. This website is not the first one I've used to give and receive corrections for our writing in a foreign language, but the system that is used here to balance the trade of corrections between users is new for me.

If I've understood wellcorrectly, I can't post a new text if I haven't corrected at least half of the quantity of corrections I've received so far. If I've understood correctly, I can't post a new text if I haven't corrected at least half of the quantity of corrections I've received so far.

If I've understood it well, I can't post a new text if I haven't corrected at least half of the quantity of corrections I've received so far. If I've understood it well, I can't post a new text if I haven't corrected at least half of the quantity of corrections I've received so far.

If I've understood wellthe concept correctly, I can't post a new text if I haven't corrected at least half (of) the quantity of corrections I've received so far. If I've understood the concept correctly, I can't post a new text if I haven't corrected at least half (of) the quantity of corrections I've received so far.

TAnd that's why we generally receive more than one correction for the same post. And that's why we generally receive more than one correction for the same post.

Or some other transition. People may say you shouldn't start a sentence with "and," but native speakers do it all the time. "Additionally" would also work to avoid starting with And.

And I must confess that I really appreciate that. And I must confess that I really appreciate that.

Nothing strictly wrong with "I must confess", but it feels a little bit inappropriate in this context, because usually it is used for something you are not proud of. For example: "I am glad you like my text, but I must confess, I copied the whole thing from my friend." Perhaps you could say: "And I have to say, I really appreciate that."

When the correcters all agree about something, reading several times the same correction several times with the same comment but phrased differently helps a lot to understand and remember it. When the correcters all agree about something, reading the same correction several times with the same comment but phrased differently helps a lot to understand and remember it.

When the correcteors all agree abouton something, reading several times the same correction several times with the same comment but phrased differently helps a lotme to understand and remember it a lot better. When the correctors all agree on something, reading the same correction several times with the same comment but phrased differently helps me to understand and remember it a lot better.

When the correcters all agree about something, reading several times the same correction with the sameseveral times with comment buts phrased in differently ways helps a lot to understand and remember it. When the correcters all agree about something, reading the same correction several times with comments phrased in different ways helps a lot to understand and remember it.

When they don't agree, I mean when someone corrects a thing that was not corrected by another persone, I deduce that the mistake is less important. When they don't agree, I mean when someone corrects a thing that was not corrected by another person, I deduce that the mistake is less important.

"another one" is really for non-living things "I ate one cake and then, when no-one was looking, I ate another one."

When they don't agree, I meansuch as when someone corrects a thing that washad not been corrected by another one, I deduce thatsomeone else, I usually think the mistake is less important. When they don't agree, such as when someone corrects a thing that had not been corrected by someone else, I usually think the mistake is less important.

In short, the gradelevel of similarity between the different corrections gives a clue about the gradelevel of importance of the mistake and helps to memorize it. In short, the level of similarity between the different corrections gives a clue about the level of importance of the mistake and helps to memorize it.

"grade" is not incorrect, but it is much less common in this sort of context.

In short, the grade of similarity between the different corrections give a clue aboutindicates the grade of importance of the mistake and helps me to memorize it. In short, the grade of similarity between the different corrections indicates the grade of importance of the mistake and helps me to memorize it.

Where you have used "grade" you could use "level" instead And apart from "indicates" you could've also said "points to"

In shortother words, the graddegree of similarity between the different corrections give a clue about the grade of importance ofs me an idea about how severe the mistake is and helps me commit it to memorize ity. In other words, the degree of similarity between the different corrections gives me an idea about how severe the mistake is and helps me commit it to memory.

In short, the graddegree of similarity between the different corrections give as clues about the graddegree of importance (OR severity) of the mistake, and helps to memorize it. In short, the degree of similarity between the different corrections gives clues about the degree of importance (OR severity) of the mistake, and helps to memorize it.

The other side of the coin is that you need to correct a certain quantity of posts so that you can post your own. The other side of the coin is that you need to correct a certain quantity of posts so that you can post your own.

nice use of "other side of the coin" ! you can also say "on the flipside"

The other side of the coin is that you need to correct a certain quantitynumber of posts so that you can post your own. The other side of the coin is that you need to correct a certain number of posts so that you can post your own.

It's a bit more natural to say "number" instead of "quantity" here

The other side of the coin is that you need to correct a certain quantitynumber of posts so that you can post your own. The other side of the coin is that you need to correct a certain number of posts so that you can post your own.

So if you want to challenge yourself with a streak, don't start writing at 23:30 because you might ¿discover/find out? So if you want to challenge yourself with a streak, don't start writing at 23:30 because you might ¿discover/find out?

both "discover" and "find out" work here

So if you want to challenge yourself with a streak, don't start writing at 23:30 because you might ¿discover/find out? So if you want to challenge yourself with a streak, don't start writing at 23:30 because you might discover/find out

Both "discover" and "find out" are equally correct :)

So if you want to challenge yourself with a streak, don't start writing at 23:30 because you might ¿discover/find out? So if you want to challenge yourself with a streak, don't start writing at 23:30 because you might find out

Either, but find out is more common.

So if you want to challenge yourself with a streak, don't start writing at 23:30 because you might ¿discover/find out? So if you want to challenge yourself with a streak, don't start writing at 23:30 because you might discover

So if you want to challenge yourself with a streak, don't start writing at 23:30 because you might ¿discover/find out? So if you want to challenge yourself with a streak, don't start writing at 23:30 because you might find out