An Assessment on how Modern Media hHelps us to sStay iInformed An Assessment on how Modern Media Helps us Stay Informed

Andrew R. Chow and Billy Perrigo are critizcising Big Tech companies in their article "The AI Arms Race is changing Everything" from 2023 for striving for profit over safety. Andrew R. Chow and Billy Perrigo are criticising Big Tech companies in their article "The AI Arms Race is changing Everything" from 2023 for striving for profit over safety.

Andrew R. Chow and Billy Perrigo are critizising Big Tech companies in their articleFrom an article written in 2023 called, "The AI Arms Race is changing Everything," from 2023 for striving forAndrew R. Chow and Billy Perrigo criticize Big Tech companies for prioritizing profits over safety. From an article written in 2023 called, "The AI Arms Race is changing Everything," Andrew R. Chow and Billy Perrigo criticize Big Tech companies for prioritizing profits over safety.

As a result, society is nowadays constantly seduced to continue scrolling using social media nowadays. As a result, society is constantly seduced to continue scrolling using social media nowadays.

As a result, modern society is nowadays constantly seduced to continuefeels conditioned to engage with social media and scroll ing using social mediadefinitely through short-form content. As a result, modern society feels conditioned to engage with social media and scroll indefinitely through short-form content.

Some English slang for what I believe you're trying to say, which I presume to be scrolling continuously through videos/reels on social media: "Brain Rotting" or "Doom Scrolling"

The effects are mirrored in "a guttered news business, a rise of misinformation, and a skyrocketing teen mental health crisis" (l. 29-30). The effects are mirrored in "a guttered news business, a rise of misinformation, and a skyrocketing teen mental health crisis" (l. 29-30).

With such immense issues, how is it possible for modern media to contributing toe towards informing citizens? With such immense issues, how is it possible for modern media to contribute towards informing citizens?

Use 'to contribute' because its better to use the infinitive here. Use towards as it can go better with 'to contribute'.

With such immense issues, how is it possible for modern media contributing toto directly inform citizens? With such immense issues, how is it possible for modern media to directly inform citizens?

At first sight, anyone is able to post without any examination of correctness. At first sight, anyone is able to post without any examination of correctness.

"At first sight" implies that what follows (anyone being able to post anything) is misleading and not actually true. You go on to list all the bad things that this causes, but then you go onto the positive aspects of social media. This does not refute the bad points, just adds good points. As a result, using "At first sight" is a bit awkward. This is because what I think you mean to say is "look at the negative effects, but also look at the positive effects". However, using "At first sight" gives the impression that you mean to say "look at the apparent bad effects, but here is why these effects are actually good..."

At first sight, anyone is able to post without any examination of correctnesproper fact checks. At first sight, anyone is able to post without any proper fact checks.

Consequently, this leads to manya lot of misinformation that aims to deform reality. Consequently, this leads to a lot of misinformation that aims to deform reality.

'Misinformation' is an uncountable noun. So you should use 'a lot' instead of many. For example: Do NOT use : 'many' water, instead use: 'a lot of' water Also, since the word 'misinformation' is singular, you should use the singular third person present tense verb ending. For example: Do NOT use : that thing give us problems; Instead use: that thing gives us problems

Consequently, this leads to manythe mass spreading of misinformation that aim to deform reality. Consequently, this leads to the mass spreading of misinformation that aim to deform reality.

Equally important is the fact that posts in social media are spread globally spread within seconds. Equally important is the fact that posts in social media are spread globally within seconds.

'spread globally' is better word order than 'globally done'

Equally important is the fact that posts ion social media arecan spread globally spread within seconds. Equally important is the fact that posts on social media can spread globally within seconds.

This eases the intentionmakes it easy to distribute fake news around the world. This makes it easy to distribute fake news around the world.

"Eases" usually means something along the lines of 'make things less tense' or 'relax'. It does not precisely mean 'to make something less difficult'. So, you should use 'makes it easy' instead. Also, intention is not really something that can be 'made easy', its something that you want, or aim for. Your goals may be made easy.

This eases the intention toallows for ease of distributeion of fake news around the world. This allows for ease of distribution of fake news around the world.

There are almost no obstacles to spread misinformation globally in such a short time, to influence people's attitude towards, for instance a specific political party in particular. There are almost no obstacles to spread misinformation globally in such a short time, to influence people's attitude towards, for instance a specific political party.

"There are almost ... a short time" is a complete thought, so to add more to it, it is wise to add a comma. Similarly, when introducing an example with the phrases "to instance" or "for example" etc, place a comma to separate these clauses.

There are almost no obstacles to prevent the spread of misinformation globally in such a short time toto negate potential influence of people's attitude towards for instance, a particular political party in particular. There are almost no obstacles to prevent the spread of misinformation globally to negate potential influence of people's attitude towards for instance, a particular political party.

Little confused on [in such a short time] so I removed it. Were you trying to say "There's nothing that can be done in a short time to prevent this" or something along those lines?

In aAddition to thatally, algorithms and filter bubbles are created to keep users scrolling. Additionally, algorithms and filter bubbles are created to keep users scrolling.

I always think "Less is more." I would always ask myself, "Can I shorten this at all?" when I would write all my essays in college.

These algorithms recognize the topics users liked andtrack user interests and activity to suggest similar videos or posts as a result. These algorithms track user interests and activity to suggest similar videos or posts as a result.

The intention is to get people to sink into these rangbubbles without noticing. The intention is to get people to sink into these bubbles without noticing.

You should use the infinitive 'to sink' instead. Also, I'm not really sure what you meant when you said 'ranges' but it does not seem to fit here.

The intention is to gettrap people sink into these ranges without noticing. The intention is to trap people into these ranges without noticing.

The problem with algorithms and filter bubbles is that one sided information can lead to a polarization ofed society. The problem with algorithms and filter bubbles is that one sided information can lead to a polarized society.

Neveretheless, there are diverse benefits of modern media. Neveretheless, there are diverse benefits of modern media.

One crucial aspect ( of what?) is the variety of opinions since anyone is able to contribute. One crucial aspect ( of what?) is the variety of opinions since anyone is able to contribute.

I assume you meant an aspect of the benefits, but it feels awkward here when you just say 'one crucial aspect' without specifying.

Furthermore, the way to inform oneself is ordinarily accessible because there are articles referring to several topics. Furthermore, the way to inform oneself is ordinarily accessible because there are articles referring to several topics.

This sentence only makes grammatical sense, not semantic sense. What do you mean when you say that 'articles referring to several topics' makes it 'ordinarily accessible' to 'inform oneself'? A diverse range of topics would only make it more likely to be informed on several topics, but not make it easier to get that information. Perhaps you mixed two thoughts up: 1. It is easier to inform oneself because smartphones capable of accessing social media are common. 2. It is possible to more broadly inform oneself because modern media covers a wide range of topics.

Furthermore, the way to inform oneself is ordinarily accessible because there are articles referring to several topicsto research the many articles that are readily accessible with a quick google search. Furthermore, the way to inform oneself is to research the many articles that are readily accessible with a quick google search.

Besides, aAnother important impact is the interat modern media connecteds nesws of news that leads to aaround the whole world, allowing stories to reach a wider audience global reachly. Another important impact is that modern media connects news around the whole world, allowing stories to reach a wider audience globally.

I think "Besides" might feel a little awkward here.

Thanks to that, German citizens may know about current events in Braszilia and Brazilians citizens may know about current events in Japan. Thanks to that, German citizens may know about current events in Brazil and Brazilian citizens may know about current events in Japan.

In terms of flow, it may sound inconsistent if you name a city in Brazil, but don't name a city in Japan, or if you say "German Citizens" but not "Brazilian Citizens" as well. This is a bit nit-picky but I think just something to think about.

As we see, there are benefits as well as disadvantages to modern social media. As we see, there are benefits as well as disadvantages to modern social media.

While your original sentence may be grammatically correct, it does not fit the overall formal, academic tone of your piece of writing. It is better to not leave clauses and predicates implied, and write full sentences.

As we see, tThere are clear benefits as well asnd disadvantages. There are clear benefits and disadvantages.

Can also say "There are clear pros and cons."

That is why the urgency to use modern media concscientiously has increased. That is why the urgency to use modern media conscientiously has increased.

I think you've mixed up the words 'conscious' (awake, aware of your surroundings), 'conscience' (a sense of moral right or wrong) and 'conscientiousness' (thoughtfulness, vigilance)

That is why the urgency to use modern media conciously has increasedFor this reason, it is essential to use modern media mindfully. For this reason, it is essential to use modern media mindfully.

For us citizens, it is significant to rely onimportant to seek multiple different media outlets instead of, rather than just one, to decrease the risk of consuming and believing misinformation. For us citizens, it is important to seek multiple different media outlets, rather than just one, to decrease the risk of consuming and believing misinformation.

Moreover, we should be fact-checking information we heard and should never notalways think critically. Moreover, we should be fact-checking information we hear and should always think critically.

When talking about things you do in general or as a habit (i.e, generally hearing some information), use the simple present form of the verb (hear, not heard). I get that you were going for a particular phrase with the double negative (never not), but it is a lot smoother to read and understand your sentence without it.

Moreover, we should be factchecking information we heard and should never not think critically.ourselves and always take in news with a grain of salt. Moreover, we should be factchecking information ourselves and always take in news with a grain of salt.

"take in news with a grain of salt" is basically me referring to "healthy skepticism" which directly correlates to what you were saying "should never not think critically."

We should always be considering if the content we just read is reliable and be aware that just because something seems credible, it does not necessarily have to be true. We should always consider if the content we read is reliable and be aware that just because something seems credible, it does not necessarily have to be true.

There are several ways to correct slight mistakes in this sentence: ...consider if content we read is reliable... (refer to content we read in general) ...consider if the content we just read is reliable... (refer to the specific content you just finished reading) ...seems credible does not necessarily make it true... ...seems credible, it does not necessarily have to be true. Many different ways to phrase the same thought.

We should always be considering if content we just read is reliable and be aware that just because something seems credible it, does not necessarily have to bemean it is true. We should always be considering if content we read is reliable and be aware that just because something seems credible, does not necessarily mean it is true.

Taking everything into account, there are some benefits but also dangerous risks to using the modern media to stay informed. Taking everything into account, there are some benefits but also dangerous risks to using modern media to stay informed.

"modern media" is generally not used with an article. It is treated like other abstract nouns, like 'happiness' or 'humanity' that take no articles. (Happiness can take some articles in very particular turns of phrase, but it usually refers to a specific kind of happiness, not the general concept of happiness itself)

Taking everything into account, there are some benefits but also dangerous risks using thewith relying on modern media to stay informed. Taking everything into account, there are some benefits but also dangerous risks with relying on modern media to stay informed.

Because of that, a conscious use of the media is fundamental to stay informed correctly. Because of that, a conscious use of the media is fundamental to stay informed correctly.

Because of that, a concious use of the media is fundamental to stay informed correctlyDue to the risks, it is fundamental to use media intentionally to ensure we stay accurately informed. Due to the risks, it is fundamental to use media intentionally to ensure we stay accurately informed.

I try to avoid starting sentences with "Because." I follow the same principle with words like "And" and "Or" as well.