May 19, 2022
Who is the Final Decision Maker in Medical Relationship？
With the progress of medicine and the development of social civilization, the medical industry has gradually transformed into a service-oriented one. The roles of doctors and patients in the medical relationship have also changed. In the old traditional medical practice, physicians had the authority and decision-making power and were responsible for major decisions. The emergence of the bio-psycho-social medical model makes the new medical model change people's view of health and disease. At the same time, this also puts forward new requirements for doctors' medical work ethics. Doctors must not only diagnose and treat diseases, but also pay attention to patients. As the patient's opinion becomes more prominent in the medical process, it is increasingly argued when a patient's treatment decision is contrary to that of the doctor or family member, who is the final decision maker? In my opinion, this should be done on a case-by-case basis.
When there is a disagreement between the doctor and the patient, the first consideration should be whether the patient has full capacity for civil conduct. If the patient does not have or is limited in capacity, it should strive to reach an agreement with the patient's family. When the patient is conscious and able to make decisions independently, if the choice is reasonable and feasible, the medical staff should adopt the patient's choice, and should not be authoritative and stubborn. Of course, in case of the patient's choice goes against their own health interests, especially when the patient can give up diagnosis and treatment due to psychological reasons, the medical staff should patiently persuade them and cooperate with their families to adjust their psychological state if necessary. However, when the persuasion is ineffective, in addition to endangering the patient's life and requiring medical staff to exercise the necessary right to intervene, the patient's choice should still be respected in most cases. If the patient's decision contradicts the interests of others and the society, the physicians should assist the patient to adjust the choice. When the patient's choice poses a threat to the health and life of others or harms the society, the doctors should limit or interfere with the patient's choice.
With the exception of the above, the adoption or choice of medical decisions by patients may sometimes be inconsistent with those of their families. At this time, from my perspective, we ought to give concrete analysis to concrete problems. If the patient has the ability to act independently, usually the patient and family members should fully discuss and agree before taking action. However, when the condition is urgent and the doctors believe that the patient's opinion is reasonable, the patient's opinion should be put in the first place. And a written agreement should be signed; If the patient is emotionally unstable or in a bad state, respect the opinions of family members, and listen to the opinions of family representatives when family members disagree. However, when the opinions of family members or representatives of family members go against the patient's health or life interests, doctors should consult the ethics committee or seek consultation with the leader of the patient unit.
To sum up, doctors, patients and their families are partners in the process of diagnosis and treatment. Doctors have professional medical knowledge, so that they can provide professional services for patients' disease treatment. They play a leading role in medical treatment. However, as the subject of diagnosis and treatment, patients' opinions should also be valued and taken seriously. Today, the process of patients seeking medical treatment has gradually changed from passive acceptance to cooperation and joint participation with doctors. Therefore, we should not only adopt the doctor's advice in medical decision-making based on the doctor's authority, nor should we specifically follow the patient's request because the patient is the served person. When there is a disagreement between doctors and patients, they should respect the opinions of patients or their families on the basis that their requests are reasonable. For unreasonable demands, doctors should adhere to their own responsibilities and bottom lines.
Who is the Final Decision Maker in Medical Relationship？s?
With the progress of medicine and the development of social civilization, the medical industry has gradually transformed into a service-oriented one.
The roles of doctors and patients in the medical relationships have also changed.
you're not referring to a particular medical relationships, but all medical relationships in general
In the older traditional medical practice, physicians had the authority and decision-making power and were responsible for major decisions.
The emergence of the bio-psycho-social medical model makes the new medical model changed people's view of health and disease.
no reason to repeat "medical model"
At the same time, this also puts forward new requirements for doctors' medical work ethics.
doctors in general's work ethic in general
Doctors must not only diagnose and treat diseases, but also pay attention to patients.
As the patient's opinion becomes more prominent in the medical process, it is increasingly argued when a patient's treatment decision is contrary to that of the doctor or family member, who isit is increasingly argued about who should be the final decision maker?
In my opinion, this should be done on a case-by-case basis.
If the patient does not have or is limited in capacity, ithey should strive to reach an agreement with the patient's family.
what kind of capacity? mental?
When the patient is conscious and able to make decisions independently, if the choice is reasonable and feasible, the medical staff should adopt the patient's choice, and should not be authoritative and stubborn.
Of course, in case of the patient's choice goes against their own health interests, especially when the patient cwants to give up diagnosis and treatment due tofor psychological reasons, the medical staff should patiently persuade them and cooperate with their families to adjusthelp with their psychological state if necessary.
However, when theEven though persuasion iscan be ineffective, in addition to endangering the patient's life and requiring medical staff to exercise the necessary right to intervene, the patient's choice should still be respected in most cases.
persuasion in general
If the patient's decision contradicts the interests of others and the society, the physicians should assist the patient to adjust their choice.
When the patient's choice poses a threat to the health and life of others or harms the society, the doctors should limit or interfere with the patient's choice.
With the exception of the above, the adoption or choice of medical decisions by patients may sometimes be inconsistent with those of their families.
At this time, from my perspective, we ought to give concrete analysis to concrete problems.
If the patient has the ability to act independently, usually the patient and family members should fully discuss and agree before taking action.
However, when their condition is urgent and the doctors believe that the patient's opinion is reasonable, the patient's opinion should be put in the first placefirst.
Andditionally, a written agreement should be signed; Iif the patient is emotionally unstable or in a bad state, respect the opinions of family members, and listen to the opinions of family representatives when family members disagree.
However, when the opinions of family members or representatives of family members go against the patient's health or life interests, doctors should consult the ethics committee or seek consultation with the leader of the patient unit.
To sum up, doctors, patients and their families are partners in the process of diagnosis and treatment.
Doctors have professional medical knowledge, so that they can provide professional services for patients' disease treatment.
They play a leading role in medical treatment.
However, as the subject of diagnosis and treatment, patients' opinions should also be valued and taken seriously.
Today, the process of patients seeking medical treatment has gradually changed from passive acceptance to cooperation and joint participation with doctors.
Therefore, we should not only adopt the doctor's advice in medical decision-making based on the doctor's authority, nor should we specificalexclusively follow the patient's request because the patient is the served person.
For unreasonable demands, doctors should adhere to their own responsibilities and bottom lines.
|
Who is the Final Decision Maker in Medical Relationship？ Who is the Final Decision Maker in Medical Relationship |
|
With the progress of medicine and the development of social civilization, the medical industry has gradually transformed into a service-oriented one. This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
The roles of doctors and patients in the medical relationship have also changed. The roles of doctors and patients in you're not referring to a particular medical relationships, but all medical relationships in general |
|
In the old traditional medical practice, physicians had the authority and decision-making power and were responsible for major decisions. In |
|
The emergence of the bio-psycho-social medical model makes the new medical model change people's view of health and disease. The emergence of the bio-psycho-social medical model no reason to repeat "medical model" |
|
At the same time, this also puts forward new requirements for doctors' medical work ethics. At the same time, this also puts forward new requirements for doctors' medical work ethic doctors in general's work ethic in general |
|
Doctors must not only diagnose and treat diseases, but also pay attention to patients. This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
As the patient's opinion becomes more prominent in the medical process, it is increasingly argued when a patient's treatment decision is contrary to that of the doctor or family member, who is the final decision maker? As the patient's opinion becomes more prominent in the medical process, |
|
In my opinion, this should be done on a case-by-case basis. This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
When there is a disagreement between the doctor and the patient, the first consideration should be whether the patient has full capacity for civil conduct. |
|
If the patient does not have or is limited in capacity, it should strive to reach an agreement with the patient's family. If the patient does not have or is limited in capacity, what kind of capacity? mental? |
|
When the patient is conscious and able to make decisions independently, if the choice is reasonable and feasible, the medical staff should adopt the patient's choice, and should not be authoritative and stubborn. This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
Of course, in case of the patient's choice goes against their own health interests, especially when the patient can give up diagnosis and treatment due to psychological reasons, the medical staff should patiently persuade them and cooperate with their families to adjust their psychological state if necessary. Of course, i |
|
However, when the persuasion is ineffective, in addition to endangering the patient's life and requiring medical staff to exercise the necessary right to intervene, the patient's choice should still be respected in most cases.
persuasion in general |
|
If the patient's decision contradicts the interests of others and the society, the physicians should assist the patient to adjust the choice. If the patient's decision contradicts the interests of others and |
|
When the patient's choice poses a threat to the health and life of others or harms the society, the doctors should limit or interfere with the patient's choice. When the patient's choice poses a threat to the health and life of others or harms |
|
With the exception of the above, the adoption or choice of medical decisions by patients may sometimes be inconsistent with those of their families. This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
At this time, from my perspective, we ought to give concrete analysis to concrete problems. This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
If the patient has the ability to act independently, usually the patient and family members should fully discuss and agree before taking action. This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
However, when the condition is urgent and the doctors believe that the patient's opinion is reasonable, the patient's opinion should be put in the first place. However, when their condition is urgent and the doctors believe that the patient's opinion is reasonable, the patient's opinion should be put |
|
And a written agreement should be signed; If the patient is emotionally unstable or in a bad state, respect the opinions of family members, and listen to the opinions of family representatives when family members disagree. A |
|
However, when the opinions of family members or representatives of family members go against the patient's health or life interests, doctors should consult the ethics committee or seek consultation with the leader of the patient unit. This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
To sum up, doctors, patients and their families are partners in the process of diagnosis and treatment. This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
Doctors have professional medical knowledge, so that they can provide professional services for patients' disease treatment. This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
They play a leading role in medical treatment. This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
However, as the subject of diagnosis and treatment, patients' opinions should also be valued and taken seriously. This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
Today, the process of patients seeking medical treatment has gradually changed from passive acceptance to cooperation and joint participation with doctors. This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
Therefore, we should not only adopt the doctor's advice in medical decision-making based on the doctor's authority, nor should we specifically follow the patient's request because the patient is the served person. Therefore, we should not only adopt the doctor's advice in medical decision-making based on the doctor's authority, nor should we |
|
When there is a disagreement between doctors and patients, they should respect the opinions of patients or their families on the basis that their requests are reasonable. |
|
For unreasonable demands, doctors should adhere to their own responsibilities and bottom lines. For unreasonable demands, doctors should adhere to their own responsibilities and bottom line |
You need LangCorrect Premium to access this feature.
Go Premium