which one should be okay?

Luca2024

May 15, 2024

which one should be okay?

I would always have bet for that fighter if he hadn't disrespected to fans.
I would always have bet for that fighter if he had been respectful of fans.
I would always have bet for that fighter if he had shown respect for fans.

en 3

Correct

Corrections

thealchemist

wWhich oOne ~~should be o~~is Okay?

I would always have bet ~~for~~on that fighter if he hadn't disrespected tohis fans.

I would always have bet ~~for~~on that fighter if he had only been respectful ofto his fans.

I would always have bet ~~for~~on that fighter if he had shown respect for his fans.

ISmith02

which one is~~hould be~~ okay?

I would have always ~~have~~ bet for that fighter if he hadn't disrespected to fans.

Since "disrespected" is a verb, we don't need the "to" after it.

I would have always ~~have~~ bet for that fighter if he had been respectful of fans.

I would have always ~~have~~ bet for that fighter if he had shown respect for fans.

Feedback

Any of these are fine (except for flipping the "have" and "always" as I indicated on each entry). I think version #1 is probably my top choice because it feels more direct to me. "Had been" and "had shown" are both in passive voice. This tends to be overused by English speakers, and generally if you can be more direct (e.g., version 1) I prefer that. You may get several different opinions though!

hotdogsuplex

I would have always ~~have~~ bet ~~for~~on that fighter if he hadn't disrespected to fans.

I would have always ~~have~~ bet ~~for~~on that fighter if he had been respectful of fans.

I would have always ~~have~~ bet ~~for~~on that fighter if he had shown respect for fans.