Butyet, today's correction was rather simple, and it doewasn't seem to be edited by thate member multiple times. yet, today's correction was rather simple and it wasn't edited by the member multiple times.

But today's correction was rather simple, and it doesidn't seem to be edited by that member multiple times. But today's correction was rather simple, and it didn't seem to be edited by that member multiple times.

“didn't” refers to past. While “doesn't” refers to present.

ButHowever, today's correction was rather simple, and it doesn't seem to be edited by that member multiple times. However, today's correction was rather simple, and it doesn't seem to be edited by that member multiple times.

On LangCorrect, I don't know why but there are sometimes multiple notices for a single correction made by a member. On LangCorrect, there are sometimes multiple notices for a single correction made by a member.

On LangCorrect, I don't know why but there are sometimes multiple noticefications for a single correction made by a member. On LangCorrect, I don't know why but there are sometimes multiple notifications for a single correction made by a member.

'notice' is correct but 'notification' is more correct terminology

On LangCorrect, I don't know why but there are sometimes multiple noticefications for a single correction made by a member. On LangCorrect, I don't know why there are sometimes multiple notifications for a single correction made by a member.

It happens from time to time, buyet today, I gotreceived three notices for a single correction. It happens from time to time, yet today I received three notices for a single correction.

It happens from time to time, but today, I got three noticefications for a single correction. It happens from time to time, but today, I got three notifications for a single correction.

It happens from time to time, but today, I got three noticefications for a single correction. It happens from time to time, but today, I got three notifications for a single correction.

If the corrections were rather complicated ones, theyis may make sense. If the corrections were rather complicated ones, this may make sense.

If the corrections were rather complicated ones, theyat may make sense. If the corrections were rather complicated ones, that may make sense.

'that' referring to the fact that you got 3 notifications

If the corrections were rather complicated ones, they mayat would make sense. If the corrections were rather complicated ones, that would make sense.

"that" instead of "they" because you are referring to the hypothetical idea of "if the corrections were rather complicated ones." The idea is not plural, so use "that." "Would" is used to discuss a possible or imagined situation while "may" is used to indicate a possibility.

If the corrections were rather complicated onesex, they may make sense. If the corrections were rather complex, they may make sense.

The correction maker wcould change his or her corrections three times. The correction maker could change his or her corrections three times.

The correction maker wouldmight change his or her corrections three times. The correction maker might change his or her corrections three times.

The correction makeor would change his or her corrections three times. The corrector would change his or her corrections three times.

The correction makerperson who corrected my texts would change his or hetheir corrections three times. The person who corrected my texts would change their corrections three times.

I would go for a gender-neutral term because you can't ensure that the people correcting are all men and women. Non-binary people and people outside the gender binary exist.

When I made corrections for an entry, and I explained a lot in detail for one errorwith details, I accidentally touched the correction button (again), resulting thatin the detailed comments are all gisappearance of the correctiones. When I made corrections for an entry and I explained with details, I accidentally touched the correction button (again), resulting in the disappearance of the corrections.

When I made corrections for an entry, and I explained a lot in detail for one error, I accidentally touched the correction button (again), resulting in that the detailed comments awere all gone. When I made corrections for an entry and explained a lot in detail for one error, I accidentally touched the correction button (again), resulting in that the detailed comments were all gone.

When I made corrections for an entry, and I explained a lot in detail for one error, I accidentally touched the correction button (again), resulting thatin the detailed comments are all gonebeing erased. When I made corrections for an entry and explained a lot in detail for one error, I accidentally touched the correction button (again), resulting in the detailed comments being erased.

OnWith the second correction, the explanation became much shorter. With the second correction, the explanation became much shorter.

OnWith the second correction, the explanation became much shorter. With the second correction, the explanation became much shorter.

It mightay be beneficial to the writer because my comment becamewas concise and to -the -point. It may be beneficial to the writer because my comment was concise and to-the-point.

IThat might actually be beneficial to the writer because my comment became concise and to the point. That might actually be beneficial to the writer because my comment became concise and to the point.

It might be beneficial to the writer because my comment became concise and to the point. It might be beneficial to the writer because my comment became concise.

hahaha

hahaha