On LangCorrect, I don't know why but there are sometimes multiple noticefications for a single correction made by a member.

It happens from time to time, but today, I got three noticefications for a single correction.

If the corrections were rather complicated onesex, they may make sense.

The correction makerperson who corrected my texts would change his or hetheir corrections three times.

I would go for a gender-neutral term because you can't ensure that the people correcting are all men and women. Non-binary people and people outside the gender binary exist.

ButHowever, today's correction was rather simple, and it doesn't seem to be edited by that member multiple times.

When I made corrections for an entry, and I explained a lot in detail for one error, I accidentally touched the correction button (again), resulting thatin the detailed comments are all gonebeing erased.

OnWith the second correction, the explanation became much shorter.

It might be beneficial to the writer because my comment became concise and to the point.

hahaha

If the corrections were rather complicated ones, they mayat would make sense.

"that" instead of "they" because you are referring to the hypothetical idea of "if the corrections were rather complicated ones." The idea is not plural, so use "that."

"Would" is used to discuss a possible or imagined situation while "may" is used to indicate a possibility.

The correction makeor would change his or her corrections three times.

But today's correction was rather simple, and it doesidn't seem to be edited by that member multiple times.

“didn't” refers to past. While “doesn't” refers to present.

On LangCorrect, I don't know why but there are sometimes multiple noticefications for a single correction made by a member.

'notice' is correct but 'notification' is more correct terminology

It happens from time to time, but today, I got three noticefications for a single correction.

If the corrections were rather complicated ones, theyat may make sense.

'that' referring to the fact that you got 3 notifications

The correction maker wouldmight change his or her corrections three times.

When I made corrections for an entry, and I explained a lot in detail for one error, I accidentally touched the correction button (again), resulting in that the detailed comments awere all gone.

IThat might actually be beneficial to the writer because my comment became concise and to the point.

On LangCorrect, I don't know why but there are sometimes multiple notices for a single correction made by a member.

It happens from time to time, buyet today, I gotreceived three notices for a single correction.

If the corrections were rather complicated ones, theyis may make sense.

The correction maker wcould change his or her corrections three times.

Butyet, today's correction was rather simple, and it doewasn't seem to be edited by thate member multiple times.

When I made corrections for an entry, and I explained a lot in detail for one errorwith details, I accidentally touched the correction button (again), resulting thatin the detailed comments are all gisappearance of the correctiones.

OnWith the second correction, the explanation became much shorter.

It mightay be beneficial to the writer because my comment becamewas concise and to -the -point.

hahaha