With the development of the internet technology, offlinethe traditional business environment has/ brick and mortar stores have seen dramatic changes. With the development of the internet technology, the traditional business environment has/ brick and mortar stores have seen dramatic changes.

either way would work

With the development of the internet technology, the offline business environment has seen dramatic changes. With the development of internet technology, the offline business environment has seen dramatic changes.

With the development of the internet technology, the offline business environmentsector has seen dramatic changes. With the development of internet technology, the offline business sector has seen dramatic changes.

Is thatis a good thing or not? Is this a good thing?

Is that a good thing or notbad thing? Is that a good thing or bad thing?

Let us to's discuss it underfrom the perspective of common citizens. Let's discuss it from the perspective of common citizens.

"from the perspective of" is the correct phrase

Let us to discuss it underfrom the perspective of the common citizens. Let us discuss it from the perspective of the common citizen.

"common citizens" is

Let us to's discuss it underfrom the perspective of common citizenseveryday people. Let's discuss it from the perspective of everyday people.

OIn the merchant’s sights' eyes, before the changes small stores canould survive forbecause of their service capabilities to the nearby market. In the merchants' eyes, before the changes small stores could survive because of their service capabilities to the nearby market.

past tense because we are talking about the past

On the merchant’s sighte, before the changes, small stores canould survive for their service capabilities to the nearbyin the local market. On the merchant’s site, before the changes, small stores could survive in the local market.

sight = to see, site = short for website. Since it's in the past can should be "could"

OIn the merchant’s sighteyes, before the changes small stores canould survive forbecause of their service capabilities to the nearby market. In the merchant’s eyes, before the changes small stores could survive because of their service capabilities to the nearby market.

But those stores arewent bankrupt one after another because the internet makde it possible for huge companies to service the offline markets withcustomers at a very low cost. But those stores went bankrupt one after another because the internet made it possible for huge companies to service customers at a very low cost.

again, past tense, "at a low cost" is more natural

But those stores arewent bankrupt one after another because the internet makde it possible for huge companies to service the offline markets withat a very low cost. But those stores went bankrupt one after another because the internet made it possible for huge companies to service the offline markets at a very low cost.

Internet when used as a proper noun has the in front of it "The internet".

But those stores arbecame bankrupt one after another because the internet makes it possible for huge companies to service the offline markets with a very low costvery cheaply. But those stores became bankrupt one after another because the internet makes it possible for huge companies to serve offline markets very cheaply.

SThe life of small retailers life becoame more difficult forbecause they have less incomed lower profits. The life of small retailers became more difficult because they had lower profits.

Income is never plural. Income is more like salary; it is money someone brings in. Profit is for businesses.

Small retailer's life has become more difficult forbecause they have less incomes. Small retailer's life has become more difficult because they have less income.

Past Tense "has become"

Small retailers' lifeves becoame more difficult foras they have less incomesir incomes decreased. Small retailers' lives became more difficult as their incomes decreased.

On the other hand, for the buyers, the stuffsre are more and moproducts that are cheap, which is no definitively not a good thing. On the other hand, for the buyers, there are more products that are cheap, which is definitely not a good thing.

products is the word you want to use instead of stuff, "definitely not" means not at all, no. "not necessarily" means maybe good maybe bad. I'm not sure which one you want to use here.

On the other hand, for the buyers, the stuffs are is more and more cheap, which is not definitively a good thing. On the other hand, for the buyers, the stuff is more and more cheap, which is not definitively a good thing.

Stuff is implied to be a multiple so it does not need an s at the end.

On the other hand, for the buyers the stuffs are more anprices decreased mfore cheaponsumers, which is no definitively not a good thing. On the other hand, prices decreased for consumers, which is definitely not a good thing.

But if they don’t have a high enough incomes, however cheap the stuffs bproducts are, they couldan not afford ithem. But if they don’t have a high enough income, however cheap the products are, they can not afford them.

But However cheap the stuff may be, if they don’t have enough incomes, however cheap the stuffs be, they could annot afford it. However cheap the stuff may be, if they don’t have enough income they cannot afford it.

But if they don’t have high enough incomes, however cheap the stuffs bproducts are, they couldan not afford itsuch products. But if they don’t have high enough incomes, however cheap products are, they can not afford such products.

You may say that those people can try to work for the big companies, that won’t work, my friend, because the stuff demand for the big ones is small. You may say that those people can try to work for the big companies, that won’t work, my friend, because the stuff demand for the big ones is small.

"because the stuff demand for the big ones is small." I don't understand this part.

You may say that those people can try to work for the big companies, but that won’t work, my friend, because the stuaff demand for the big oncompanies is small. You may say that those people can try to work for the big companies, but that won’t work my friend, because the staff demand for the big companies is small.

You may say that thoese people can try to work for the big companies, t. That won’t work, my friend, because the stuffproduct demand for the big onbig companies is small. You may say that these people can try to work for big companies. That won’t work, my friend, because the product demand for big companies is small.

And more individualspeople will lostose their jobs. And more people will loose their jobs.

And more individuals will loste their jobs. And more individuals will lose their jobs.

Future tense = Lost becomes "will lose". This should probably be part of the last sentence rather than a new sentence.

And mMore individuals will loste their jobs. More individuals will lose their jobs.

There areis a growing gap between the rich and the poor. There is a growing gap between the rich and the poor.

gap is singular

There areis a growing gap between the rich and the poor. There is a growing gap between the rich and the poor.

There areis a growing gap between the rich and the poor. There is a growing gap between the rich and the poor.

I know theat technology developing is great for the whole human race, but except the grand proposition, specific individuals can not be ignored because it is about every of us. I know that technology developing is great for the whole human race, but except the grand proposition, specific individuals can not be ignored because it is about every of us.

I don't understand the second half of the sentence.

I know theat technologyical developingment is great for the whole human race, but except the grand proposition, specific individuals can not be ignored it because it is aboutmpacts every one of us. I know that technological development is great for the whole human race, except the grand proposition, specific individuals can not ignore it because it impacts every one of us.

I know the technologyical developingment is great for the whole human race, but as a whole, except for the grand proposition, specific individuals can not be ignored it because it is aboutmpacts every one of us. I know technological development is great for the human race as a whole, except for the grand proposition, specific individuals cannot ignore it because it impacts every one of us.

There is no other choice but to rely on the government forto solvinge this problem. There is no other choice but to rely on the government to solve this problem.

Offline businBrick-and-mortar storess Brick-and-mortar stores