History
Open to any feedback
I often listen to podcasts about world history. Radio personalities usually speak objectively because most of world history have been moving without my country until modern times. Thus, I want to learn my country's history through the eyes in other country. It surely gives me a new perspective. But I cannot find good podcasts.
Radio personalities usually speak objectively because most of worldworld's history havehas been moving on without my country up until modern times.
Thus, I want to learn about my country's history through the eyes in otherof another country.
It surely giveswould give me a new perspective.
But I cannot find any good podcasts.
Overall feedback
Good job, I just added a few words to make it feel slightly more natural for me and my personal preference.
Thanks for the correction!
Radio personalitieshosts usually speak objectively because most of world history have been movingunfolded without my country being involved until modern times.
Thus, I want to learn my country's history through the eyes in otherof another country.
It surely gives me a new perspective.
No change suggested
Overall feedback
I recently watched a Youtube video about why Japan had been closed to other countries until the mid 19th century, which is why many Japaneses are still wary of foreigners today. Perhaps you've wanted to know what was happening outside of Japan while it was closed, but I wanted to share it with you anyway, because I found it very interesting. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CTz6DQJH1Og&t=198s
^ I made a typo! There's no such word as "Japaneses", I meant to type "many Japanese people are still ...".
Thank you. I was looking for something like this! I'll listen to it on my way to school tomorrow!
Radio personalities usually speak objectively because most of world history have been moving without my country has not been mentioned in the world history until modern timesrecently.
Not quite sure what you are trying to say here, so the "correction" is based on my guess on your meaning. However it still does not quite make sense. By objectively did you actually mean in an objecting kind of tone? Since "objective" has a different meaning than "objecting/objection".
Thus, I want to learn my country's history through the eyes inof other countrycountries.
It would surely givesgive me a new perspective.
Since it sounds like you haven't found the podcast that gives you this perspective yet, so adding the "would" will give the hypothetical nuance to your sentence.
Thank you for the correction. I tried to convey that I wanted to hear a non-subjective explanation of history.
Discussion
No discussion yet.
Log in to join the discussion.