However, the line chart thatfrom January 11 I attached ton this page, which I screened as of January 11, illustratinges that the price has increased from just under 20,000 to nearly $47,000 by, an increase of 161.93% growth.

It' was also amazing from October to early December, the price having surged from 26,000 to $44,100.

I once readcame across an article that said Google Bard predicted the price of Bitcoin would be in a bullish stageforecasted a bullish trend for the price of Bitcoin by the end of 2023.

Still kind of a clunky sentence even with my edit. I feel like people mostly use bullish as a way to describe people. E.g. "He was bullish on that stock".

Based on this case, Google Bard, the AI chatbot developed by Google showed its value this time.

I feel like "this time" is redundant when you already say "this case"

I am thinking of an idea;wondering: AI andor bitcoin, w? Which one is more important for regular people.

Use 'or' when you want to present an option, 'and' implies you can have both of them, so it wouldn't matter which is more important.

However, the line chart that I attached on this page, which I screencaptured as of January 11, illustrating that the price has increased from just under $20,000 to nearly $47,000 by, showing 161.93% growth.

Instead of "screened" you could also use a word like "screenshotted" which I don't think is in the dictionary but would be acceptable in general usage.

It's also amazing that from October to early December, the price surged from $26,000 to $44,100.

I once read an article that said Google Bard predicted the price ofat Bitcoin would be in a bullish stage by the end of 2023.

"Bullish" generally refers to an attitude towards an asset and not a specific price. "Bull" and "Bear" refer to specific market conditions.

Examples:

I feel bullish about Bitcoin

The market is up 20% from its low and economists are saying it's a bull market

The market is down 20% over the last quarter and it's looking like we're in a bear market

Based on this case, Google Bard, the AI chatbot developed by Google, showed its value this time.

I am thinking of an idea; AI and bitcoin, which one is more important for regular people.

An idea is a specific thing, whereas asking which one is more important is a general thought.

Examples:

I am thinking of an idea: An app which allows users to buy bitcoins

Bitcoin has been recognized as the most valuable cryptocurrency, although some influencers have predicted its value will eventually reach zero(*) in the future.

The language is fine, but its value can't be exactly zero so I imagine a more specific word here might be more accurate.

However, the line chart taken from a screenshot that I attached on this page, which I screened astook ofn January 11, illustrating that the price has increased from just under $20,000 to nearly $47,000 by, a 161.93% growth.

as of: "The situation had developed as far as X on this date."
on: "The day I took the screenshot was this date."

screened: This is a word, but it doesn't mean "captured in a screenshot"

It's also amazing from October to early December, the price surged from $26,000 to $44,100.

I once read an article that said Google Bard predicted(*) the price of Bitcoin would be in a bullish stage by the end of 2023.

The language is technically fine, but Bard is not capable of conducting research, making predictions, and reporting this information to journalists. It's conceivable to imagine it being given the information to make such a prediction--although it's not a given that this prediction would be based on statistical analysis rather than its natural language processing or regurgitation of information scraped from various websites--but for technical accuracy I think this could be better worded.

something like: Google Bard was used (by whom) to generate a prediction that...

Based on this case, Google Bard, the AI chatbot developed by Google, showed its value this time.

The logical sentence is "Google Bard showed its value this time." The part, "the AI chatbot developed by Google," is supplementary, clarifying information that needs a comma at the end. Also, normally you'd put that clarifying information with the sentence that first introduces Google Bard into the discussion, not at the end.

I am thinking of an idea;wondering, between AI and bitcoin, which one is more important for regular people.

Bitcoin has been recognized as the most valuable cryptocurrency, although some influencers have predicted its value will eventually reach zerobe worthless in the future.

This is an alternative.

However, the line chart that I attached on this page, which I screened as of January 11, illustratinges that the price has increased from just under $20,000 by 161.93% to nearly $47,000 by 161.93% growth.

It's aAlso amazingly, from October to early December, the price surged from $26,000 to $44,100.

Based on this case, Google Bard, the AI chatbot developed by Google showed its value this time.

I am thinking of an idea;: AI andor bitcoin, which one is more important for regular people.?