A man who claimed he had lived in France for 10 years, however,ad his French ability waskills questioned by a beautiful CEO. A man who claimed he had lived in France for 10 years, had his French skills questioned by a beautiful CEO.

AThere was a man who claimed he had lived in France for 10 years, however, his French ability was questioned by a beautiful CEO. There was a man who claimed he had lived in France for 10 years, however, his French ability was questioned by a beautiful CEO.

BETTER: A man who claimed heto hadve lived in France for 10 years, h. However, his French ability was questioned by a beautiful CEO. BETTER: A man claimed to have lived in France for 10 years. However, his French ability was questioned by a CEO.

LOGIC: Whether the CEO was "beautiful" is irrelevant, so I recommend deleting the word "beautiful."

Aa man who claimed he had lived in France for 10 years, however,ad his French ability was questioned by a beautiful CEO. a man who claimed he had lived in France for 10 years had his French ability questioned by a beautiful CEO.

this clause connects to the previous clause

Initially, nearly all the audience, the host, and the remaining bosses on-site thought the interviewere was a liar, and suspected the authentication of his certificate. Initially, nearly all the audience, the host, and the remaining bosses on-site thought the interviewee was a liar, and suspected the authentication of his certificate.

interviewer: a person who interviews a job applicant interviewee: a job applicant who is interviewed by an interviewer

Initially, nearly all ththe whole audience, the host, and the remaining bosses on-site thought the interviewer was a liar, and suspected the authentication of his certificate. Initially, nearly the whole audience, the host, and the remaining bosses on-site thought the interviewer was a liar, and suspected the authentication of his certificate.

Initially, nearly all the audience, host, and the remaining bosses on-site thought the interviewer was a liar, and suspected the authenticationity of his certificatepapers. Initially, nearly all the audience, host, and the remaining bosses on-site thought the interviewer was a liar, and suspected the authenticity of his papers.

Initially, nearly all the audience, host, and the remaining bosses on-site thought the interviewere (candidate) was a liar, and suspected the authentication of his certificate. Initially, nearly all the audience, host, and the remaining bosses on-site thought the interviewee (candidate) was a liar, and suspected the authentication of his certificate.

I assume you're talking about the man who is getting interviewed? Then it's "interviewee" instead of interviewer, but people don't usually use that word and tend to say candidate.

Following this, all the bosses and the host accused the interviewere, and even caused him to faint on the stage. Following this, all the bosses and the host accused the interviewee, and even caused him to faint on the stage.

Following this, all the bosses and the host accused the interviewer of lying/falsifying his certificate, and even caused him to faint on the stage. Following this, the bosses and the host accused the interviewer of lying/falsifying his certificate, and even caused him to faint on stage.

Following this, all the bosses and the host accused the interviewer, andperson who claimed in France, even causeding him to faint on the stage. Following this, all the bosses and the host accused the person who claimed in France, even causing him to faint on the stage.

Following this, all the bosses and the host accused the interviewer,candidate (of faking his French abilities) and even caused him to faint on the stage. Following this, all the bosses and the host accused the candidate (of faking his French abilities) and even caused him to faint on the stage.

Interestingly, after the show clip surfaced on the internet., Interestingly, after the show clip surfaced on the internet,

Interestingly, afterthe clip from the show clip surfaced on the internet later. Interestingly, the clip from the show surfaced on the internet later.

It's more natural this way

Interestingly, after clip of theis show clip surfaced on the internet later on. Interestingly, a clip of this show surfaced on the internet later on.

Interestingly, after the show clip surfaced on the internet., Interestingly, after the show clip surfaced on the internet,

This is also an incomplete clause and cannot be a sentence on its own.

ItAbout seven years ago, there was an old funny story from a well-known TV job interview show in China, about seven years ago. About seven years ago, there was an old funny story from a well-known TV job interview show in China.

ItThere was an old funny story from a well-known TV job interview show in China, about seven years ago. There was an old funny story from a well-known TV job interview show in China about seven years ago.

It waALSO POSSIBLE: This is an old funny, old story from a well-known TV job interview show in China, about seven years ago. ALSO POSSIBLE: This is an funny, old story from a well-known TV job interview show in China, about seven years ago.

Perhaps "This is an . . ." is better since you are now introducing the story to readers.

It wasn an old funny story from a well-known TV job interview show in ChinaChinese TV show about job interviews, about seven years ago., In an old funny story from a well-known Chinese TV show about job interviews, about seven years ago,

This is what's known as an incomplete clause and cannot be a sentence. It needs to be connected to another clause.

Ssome people who know French questionwondered why the interviewere couldn't catch the French question, due to the reason thatunderstand the questions in French, as the CEO's French was really bad. some people who know French wondered why the interviewee couldn't understand the questions in French, as the CEO's French was really bad.

Some people who know French questionedwere asking why the interviewer couldn't catch the French question, due tounderstand the question in French, the reason being that the CEO's French was reallytoo bad. Some people who know French were asking why the interviewer couldn't understand the question in French, the reason being that the CEO's French was too bad.

It's a lot more common to say "asked why" rather than "questioned why." The latter is just more formal.

Some people who know Frenchroficient French speakers questioned why the interviewer couldn't catch the French questions, due to the reasonsuggesting that the CEO's French was really bad. Some proficient French speakers questioned why the interviewer couldn't catch the French questions, suggesting that the CEO's French was really bad.

Ssome people who knoew French questioned why the interviewersuspected that the reason the candidate couldn't catch the French question, due to the reason that was because the CEO's French was really bad. some people who knew French suspected that the reason the candidate couldn't catch the French question was because the CEO's French was really bad.

I think this is what you mean

Furthermore, athe French consulate confirmed that the certificate from the interviewere was indeed genuine. Furthermore, the French consulate confirmed that the certificate from the interviewee was indeed genuine.

Furthermore, aHowever, a representative from the French consulate confirmed that the certificate from the interviewer was indeed genuine. However, a representative from the French consulate confirmed that the certificate from the interviewer was indeed genuine.

Furthermore, a French consulate confirmed that the certificate from the interviewercandidate was indeed genuine. Furthermore, a French consulate confirmed that the certificate from the candidate was indeed genuine.

Finally, a few days later., Finally, a few days later,

Finally, a few days later., Finally, a few days later,

This isn't a complete sentence alone - let's add it to the next phrase.

Finally, a few days later., Finally, a few days later,

Tthe beautiful CEO apologized for her words. the beautiful CEO apologized for her words.

Tthe beautifuly apologized for her words. the beauty apologized for her words.

Beautiful is an adjective; you can use "beauty" if you are looking for a noun/to reference the woman.

The beautifulCEO apologized for her words. The CEO apologized for her words.

Tthe beautiful CEO apologized for her words. the beautiful CEO apologized for her words.

The beautiful CEO apologized for her wordlies. The beautiful CEO apologized for her lies.

If you know French, you can try to confirm her French ability. If you know French, you can try to confirm her French ability.

She has a heavy accent. I understood part of what she said: Pouvez-vous me dire la différence marketing sur ?????? entre la Chine et la France ? However, I did get the gist of the question: Pouvez-vous me dire quelle est la différence de marketing entre la Chine et la France ?

If you know French well, you can try toprobably confirm her French ability. If you know French well, you can probably confirm her French ability.