SanHang's avatar
SanHang

Sept. 1, 2020

0
the environmental determinism VS. possibility

The first difference between the environmental determinism and possibilism is to build by a different time.

But in my opinion, both the theory I agree.

The idea of environmental determinism was created before the growing global travel. Before the beginning of globalism, people have to depend on their local natural resources to move on. In other words, people don't much opportunity to change their situation and gain a better life before globalism. The quality of local resource will depress the society development. For the Caribbean, it doesn't have many fertile to develop their agriculture. So in the early generation, people have to fish to support their survival.

For environmental possibilism, the Caribbean's pirates are a very good example to explain. When fishing can not support the Caribbean's people live and living under the fear of other countries' aggression, many Caribbean people forcibly became pirates. I think that is the best example to show how people have the ability to adjust to their environment for a better life :D

Corrections (1)
Correction Settings
Choose how corrections are organized

Only show inserted text
Word-level diffs are planned for a future update.

I think that is the best example to show how people have the ability to adjust to their environment for a better life :D

the environmental determinism VS. possibility


the environmental determinism VS. possibility environmental determinism VS. possibility

The first difference between the environmental determinism and possibilism is to build by a different time.


The first difference between the environmental determinism and possibilismty is to build by a different time. The first difference between environmental determinism and possibility is to build by a different time.

"possibilism" is not an English word. I don't understand what you mean by "to build by a different time".

But in my opinion, both the theory I agree.


But in my opinion, boI agree with bothe theory I agreeies. But in my opinion, I agree with both theories.

The idea of environmental determinism was created before the growing global travel.


The idea of environmental determinism was created before the growingera of global travel. The idea of environmental determinism was created before the era of global travel.

Before the beginning of globalism, people have to depend on their local natural resources to move on.


Before the beginning of globalism, people haved to depend on their local natural resources to move onget by. Before globalism, people had to depend on their local natural resources to get by.

Use past tense

In other words, people don't much opportunity to change their situation and gain a better life before globalism.


In other words, people don'tid not have much opportunity to change their situation and gain a better life before globalism. In other words, people did not have much opportunity to change their situation and gain a better life before globalism.

Use past tense

The quality of local resource will depress the society development.


The quality of local resource willcan depress the society development. The quality of local resource can depress the society development.

"can" implies uncertainty. "will" is a statement of certainty, which does not sound correct here.

For the Caribbean, it doesn't have many fertile to develop their agriculture.


For example, the Caribbean, it doesn't have many fertile fields to develop theirits agriculture. For example, the Caribbean doesn't have many fertile fields to develop its agriculture.

"fertile" is an adjective. It must have a noun to modify. I added the word "fields". I changed "their" to "its" because "Carribbean" is singular, to keep agreement with the subject.

So in the early generation, people have to fish to support their survival.


So in the early generations, people haved to fish to support their survival. So in early generations, people had to fish to support their survival.

For environmental possibilism, the Caribbean's pirates are a very good example to explain.


For environmental possibilismty, the Caribbean's pirates areoffer a very good example to explain. For environmental possibility, the Caribbean's pirates offer a very good example.

When fishing can not support the Caribbean's people live and living under the fear of other countries' aggression, many Caribbean people forcibly became pirates.


When fishing canould not support the Caribbean's people's live andlihood, they livinged under the fear of other countries' aggression, m. Many Caribbean people forcibreluctantly became pirates. When fishing could not support the Caribbean people's livelihood, they lived under the fear of other countries' aggression. Many Caribbean people reluctantly became pirates.

"reluctantly" is better than "forcibly", because the word "forcibly" implies another party to the action - either someone forcing or being forced. "reluctantly" refers to an coming from within, in response to events beyond one's control.

I think that is the best example to show how people have the ability to adjust to their environment for a better life :D


This sentence has been marked as perfect!

You need LangCorrect Premium to access this feature.

Go Premium