yesterday
The Lake.
One day, I was walked for a wood with my parents. When we arrived to the Lake, It was full people, and my father said. This is fault of Pedro Sanchez, I laugh.
The Lake.
One day, I was walked for aing through the woods with my parents.
According to online dictionaries, you can indeed say "a wood" to specify an area of trees that is a little smaller than a forest, however this isn't commonly said in the United States (at least, not as far as I'm aware). Instead, we have a weird habit of only ever saying "the woods", no matter what.
"The woods" is a set phrase many of us learned from fantasy stories and fairy tales (like "Little Red Riding Hood" or "Hansel and Gretel", or old Disney cartoons). Technically, a "wood" is an area of trees that is large, but not as large as a forest. However, for most Americans, I'm pretty sure the difference in our minds between "the woods" and "forest" is more in tone than in size. The woods are playful, magical, and mysterious, maybe dark and scary sometimes. But a forest feels more general, more real.
When we arrived to the Llake, Iit was full peoplecrowded, and my father said., "this is Pedro Sanchez's fault."
To be grammatically correct, you would want to say it was "full of people", not "full people". "Full people" sounds to me like... I guess people who have all eaten a big dinner and are now full?
However, we more commonly say a place is "crowded" to mean there are a lot of people (that is, a "crowd"). You might hear "full of people" sometimes, but "crowded" is more often said.
This is fault of Pedro Sanchez, I laughed.
A more grammatically correct version of your original quote would be, "This is the fault of Pedro Sanchez." But the other phrasing is far more natural. Generally, when talking about two nouns, English speakers often lean towards "[B]'s [A]" over "[A] of [B]". There are exceptions to this, though, like with spatial words ("I sat in front of the teacher") or words relating to part of a whole ("the majority of the voters voted yes").
Feedback
You seem to struggle a bit with verb tenses and prepositions ("of", "for", "through", etc). But otherwise, nicely done overall. Hope this helps!
One day, I was walked for athrough the woods with my parents.
When we arrived to the Llake, Iit was full people, and m. My father said. "This is fault of Pedro Sanchez"
This is fault of Pedro Sanchez, I laughed.
The Lake.
One day, I was walked for athrough the woods with my parents.
"the woods" might be confusing in English. There is no "a wood". If you're talking about a forest it's always "THE woods"
When we arrived/got to the Llake, Iit was full people, and m. My father said.,
My father said, "... ...". Would be the next sentence.
"This is fault of Pedro Sanchez, I's fault". It made me laugh.
Feedback
I wonder what Pedro did haha.
|
The Lake. This sentence has been marked as perfect! This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
One day, I was walked for a wood with my parents. One day, I "the woods" might be confusing in English. There is no "a wood". If you're talking about a forest it's always "THE woods" One day, I One day, I was walk According to online dictionaries, you can indeed say "a wood" to specify an area of trees that is a little smaller than a forest, however this isn't commonly said in the United States (at least, not as far as I'm aware). Instead, we have a weird habit of only ever saying "the woods", no matter what. "The woods" is a set phrase many of us learned from fantasy stories and fairy tales (like "Little Red Riding Hood" or "Hansel and Gretel", or old Disney cartoons). Technically, a "wood" is an area of trees that is large, but not as large as a forest. However, for most Americans, I'm pretty sure the difference in our minds between "the woods" and "forest" is more in tone than in size. The woods are playful, magical, and mysterious, maybe dark and scary sometimes. But a forest feels more general, more real. |
|
When we arrived to the Lake, It was full people, and my father said. When we arrived/got to the My father said, "... ...". Would be the next sentence. When we arrived to the When we arrived to the To be grammatically correct, you would want to say it was "full of people", not "full people". "Full people" sounds to me like... I guess people who have all eaten a big dinner and are now full? However, we more commonly say a place is "crowded" to mean there are a lot of people (that is, a "crowd"). You might hear "full of people" sometimes, but "crowded" is more often said. |
|
This is fault of Pedro Sanchez, I laugh. "This is
A more grammatically correct version of your original quote would be, "This is the fault of Pedro Sanchez." But the other phrasing is far more natural. Generally, when talking about two nouns, English speakers often lean towards "[B]'s [A]" over "[A] of [B]". There are exceptions to this, though, like with spatial words ("I sat in front of the teacher") or words relating to part of a whole ("the majority of the voters voted yes"). |
You need LangCorrect Premium to access this feature.
Go Premium