today
< Over time, many of their buttons became viewed as “extra” and removed , and with each reduction these devices eventually developed into the phones in our pockets.>
In this sentence, I would like to know whether 'removed' is grammatically correct or not.
I believe it can be used in parallel with 'viewed' after the verb 'became'.
Is this construction possible?
Is this grammatically correct?
< Over time, many of their buttons became viewed as “extra” andneous and were removed , and with each reduction these devices eventually developed into the phones in our pockets (today).>
< Over time, many of their buttons became viewed as extraneous and were removed, and with each reduction these devices eventually developed into the phones in our pockets (today).>
While such a parallel construction is grammatical, "became removed" is a very awkward expression that makes the sentence sound unnatural.
In this sentence, I would like to know whether 'removed' is grammatically correct or not.
I believe it can be used in parallel with 'viewed' after the verb 'became'.
Is this construction possible?
Is this grammatically correct?
< "Over time, many of their buttons became viewed as “extraneous” and removed , and with each reduction these devices eventually developed into the phones in our pockets.> today."
"Over time, many of their buttons became viewed as “extraneous” and removed, and with each reduction these devices eventually developed into the phones in our pockets today."
In this sentence, I would like to know whether 'removed' is grammatically correct or not.
I believe it can be used in parallel with 'viewed' after the verb 'became'.
Is this construction possible?
Feedback
Yes, it's correct!
|
Is this grammatically correct? This sentence has been marked as perfect! This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
< Over time, many of their buttons became viewed as “extra” and removed , and with each reduction these devices eventually developed into the phones in our pockets.>
< Over time, many of their buttons became viewed as While such a parallel construction is grammatical, "became removed" is a very awkward expression that makes the sentence sound unnatural.
|
|
In this sentence, I want to know whether 'removed' is grammatically correct or not. |
|
I think it can be paralleled with 'viewed' after 'became'. |
|
Is it possible? |
|
In this sentence, I would like to know whether 'removed' is grammatically correct or not. This sentence has been marked as perfect! This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
I believe it can be used in parallel with 'viewed' after the verb 'became'. This sentence has been marked as perfect! This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
Is this construction possible? This sentence has been marked as perfect! This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
You need LangCorrect Premium to access this feature.
Go Premium