I always ask myself this these days. I always ask myself this these days.

I am a worker inn employee at a universal company whoich designs how websites works; I am a wife married withto a man who loves playing computer games. I am an employee at a universal company which designs how websites work; I am a wife married to a man who loves playing computer games.

I am a worker in a universal company who design hows website works; I am athe wife married withof a man who loves playing computer games. I am a worker in a universal company who designs websites; I am the wife of a man who loves playing computer games.

I am a worker in a universal company whothat designs how websites works; I am a wife married withto a man who loves playing computer games. I am a worker in a company that designs how websites work; I am a wife married to a man who loves playing computer games.

Not sure what you mean by universal company.

I am a worker in a universal company whoich design hows website works; I am a wife married withto a man who loves playing computer games. I am a worker in a universal company which designs websites; I am a wife married to a man who loves playing computer games.

You could also say "which designs the internal architecture of websites" or "which keeps websites running"

But those are only my roles in society or inand in my family. But those are only my roles in society and in my family.

But those are only my roles in society or inand within my family. But those are only my roles in society and within my family.

But those are only my roles in society or in family.social and familial roles. But those are only my social and familial roles.

It coulddoes not describe who are youyou are. It does not describe who you are.

It couldThey do not describe who are youyou are. They do not describe who you are.

It could not describe who are youyou are. It could not describe who you are.

It couldThey do not describe who are you. They do not describe who are you.

You need a plural if you are referring to both social and family roles; I changed "could" to "do" because I think it reads better but the original is fine/makes sense

Only that what you like and what you don’t that can draw what character you are. Only that what you like and what you don’t that can draw what character you are.

I'm can't quite pick up what distinction you're trying to make between this and the previous sentence?

However, our education does not guide us to discover who youwe are, but to train you skills to workinstead teaches skills for the workplace. However, our education does not guide us to discover who we are, but instead teaches skills for the workplace.

However, our education does not guide us to discover who youwe are, but tonly train you skillss us in the skills needed to work. However, our education does not guide us to discover who we are, but only trains us in the skills needed to work.

HoweverFurthermore, our education does not guide us to discoverour understanding of who youwe are, but toit does however, train your skills tofor work. Furthermore, our education does not guide our understanding of who we are, it does however, train our skills for work.

However, our education does not guide us to discover who youwe are, but toit only trains your skills to work. However, our education does not guide us to discover who we are, it only trains your skill to work.

"does" because education is singular; "who we are" because you said "our education" not "your education"

Nowadays we all have a better lifeves and don’t need to worry about surviving, weleading us to care more about our inner lives. Nowadays we all have better lives and don’t need to worry about surviving, leading us to care more about our inner lives.

Nowadays, since we all have a better lifeves and don’t need to worry about surviving, we care more about our inner lives. Nowadays, since we all have better lives and don’t need to worry about surviving, we care more about our inner lives.

Nowadays we all have a better liflife is better than before and we don’t need to worry about surviving, we care more about our inner lives. Nowadays life is better than before and we don’t need to worry about surviving, we care more about our inner lives.

"have a better life" implies you are comparing it to something else

So I think theFor this reason, I think education modestyles should be changed. For this reason, I think education styles should change.

So I think the education mode should be changed. So I think the education mode should be changed.

Not sure what you meant by education mode

So I think the education model should be changed. So I think the education model should be changed.

"mode of education" is just the means of instruction (i.e. virtual, in-person, etc.); "education model" refers to the overall structure and purpose of education

It coulddoes not describe who I am. It does not describe who I am.

It couldThey do not describe who I am. They do not describe who I am.

ItNeither could notI describe who I am. Neither could I describe who I am.

It couldThey do not describe who I am. They do not describe who I am.

Only what you like and what you don’t that can draw what characterdetermines who you are. Only what you like and what you don’t determines who you are.

Only what you like and what you don’t that can draw whatdislike can describe your character you are. Only what you like and dislike can describe your character.

OnlyNoticing what you like and what you don’t that can draw whatis one of the ways to understand your character you are. Noticing what you like and what you don’t is one of the ways to understand your character.

Only whatthe things you likedo and what you don’t thatdo not like can draw whatthe character you are. Only the things you do and do not like can draw the character you are.

Edited a bit for clarity; the only grammar mistake is the "that" shouldn't be there in "don't that can" unless you start the sentence with "It is"