t¶
Two ethnic groups do scholars think combined

The sScholars think that the Aryans and the Dravidian combined to forms together formed the Indian civilization.

This supposition from these scholars is based on the that they founddiscovery of a complete and organized plumbing and irrigation system on the site ofwhere early Dravidian people in Indialived.

AndFrom it, the scholars made they inferredence that this technologicaladvanced civilization was spread bymigrated to the Nnorthern.

“According to theories advanintroduced by eighteenth and nineteenth-century European scholars, the highly organized cultures of the Indus Valley ands well as other partregions of the Indian subcontinent were overrun bycomposed of lighter-skinned nomadic invaders from some homeland to the north, whose peoplewho migrated to the north. These invaders also spread westward and developed...

” The establishment... a system of a plumbing and irrigation system as seen as a possible source, supporting the Aryan Invasion Theory, which the biologist scholars through comparing the similarity of DNA alleles to find the connection between Aryan and Dravidian. theory. After comparing the DNA alleles between the Aryans and the Dravidians, biologists were able to conclude that they are connected.

Except for the plumbing systems, the early Dravidian people had completelys had already established urban centers in the Indus Valley, around between 2500 BCE toand 1500 BCE.

That isese centers created the Indus Valley Civilization.

The eEarly European scholars thought that civilization is culture combiningrepresents the combination of local culture with a foreign culture.

“There is a theory which argueds that the Vedas, the religious texts often referred to as the foundations of Hinduismwho founded Hinduism as often mentioned in religious texts, were the productdescendants of the Aryan invaders and not ofrom indigenous Indians, or p. Perhaps a combinationthey are the mixture of both cultures (Fisher 73).”

The Aryan Invasion Theory was based on finding the similarity of DNA alleles between the Aryan and Dravidian.

But at theThe evidence that supports the Invasion theory, at a biology level, this evidence is not reliable.

In the two unrelated groups, it is still possiblet is possible for two unrelated ethnic groups to have a similarity inies in their DNA alleles.

In other words, until now, the supporters of Aryan Invasion Theory don’t have any strong evidence to root the reliability of the theory.

There is as yet no confirmed evidence of what actually happened, ands the theory is .....

“Aryan Invasion Theory” is... strongly contested by many scholars who thinkdo not think ....

there is nosufficient proof to support it (Fisher 73).”

tTwo eEthnic gGroups do sThat Scholars think cBelieve Combined

The scholars think that Aryans and Dravidians combined to form Indian civilization.

This supposition from these scholar hypothesis is based on the fact that they found a complete and organized plumbing and irrigation system on the site ofccupied by early Dravidian people in India.

And tThey inferred that this technological civilization was spread by the Northern.

I don't really understand what you mean by "Northern".

“According to theories advanced by eighteenth and nineteenth-century European scholars, the highly organized cultures of the Indus Valley and other parts of the subcontinent were overrun by lighter-skinned nomadic invaders from some homeland to the north, whose peoples also spread westward and developed"

European civilizations ( Fisher 73).

This should really be part of the previous sentence.

” The establishment of a plumbing and irrigation system as is seen as a possible source supporting the Aryan Invasion Theory, which the biologist scholars through comparing the similarity of DNA alleles to find the connection between Aryan and Dravidian. Biologists have also found a connection between the Aryans and Dravidians through comparing the similarity of DNA alleles.

Except forWith the exception of plumbing systems, the early Dravidian people had completelyx urban centers in the Indus Valley, from around 2500 BCE to 1500 BCE.

That is the Indus Valley Civilization.

This is technically a grammatically correct English sentence, but it doesn't really make any sense based off the previous passages. It would make more sense to say, "It was called the Indus Valley Civilization".

The early European scholars thought that this civilization iswas the result of Dravidian culture combininged with a foreign culture.

“The theory argued that the Vedas, the religious texts often referred to as the foundations of Hinduism, were the product of the invaders and not of indigenous Indians, or perhaps a combination of both cultures” (Fisher 73).”

The Aryan Invasion Theory was based on finding the similarity ofsimilarities found in the DNA alleles betweenof the Aryans and Dravidians.

But aton the biologyical level, this evidence is not reliable.

You can say "isn't" instead of "is not".

In the two unrelated groups, it ist's still possible to have a similarity in DNA alleles between two unrelated groups.

In other words, untileven now, the supporters of the Aryan Invasion Theory don’t have any strong evidence to rootback the reliability of the theory.

“.

"There is as of yet no confirmed evidence of what actually happened, and the

there is no proof to support it ” (Fisher 73).”

I don't know if it was a glitch, but the last 3 sentences should be grouped together into one sentence.