Censorship of art and artists .¶
¶
The censorship of art and artists is a complex topic that has existed alongthroughout history, reflecting the tension between freedom of speech and social rules.

Censorship could be shownperformed in different ways, starting from prohibition of art works, untilto self censorship fromby the artists themselves, who may be afraid of grjudgesment or criticism.

This phenomenom don’t just affect individual creativity, but also limits the cultural and social speechactivity that art can motivate.

Often, censorship it’s justified for the sake of morality, politics or religion.

However, this restriction can lead to the losts of important voices and homogenization of thought.

Artists such as Pablo Picasso and Frida Kahlo have faced censorship at different times, but their resilience haves opened some places to art works that challenge conventionalism ideas and motivate deep reflexctions about human condition.

Art has the power ofto ask questionings, provoke and, sometimes, incomodate (?).

incomodate is not an English word, not sure what you mean here

Censorship, in the process of trying to silence these voices, nodoesn't just deprive society of enriching experiences, but exposes the fear to theartist to fear of confrontation as well.

In an ideal world, art should be a safe space for exploration and expression, where differences are celebrated instead of being repressed.

The fight against censorship is, as a conclusion, a defense of creative freedom and a called ousupport for the open and diversitye expression in the artistic area.

Censorship of art and artists ¶
The censorship of art and artists is a complex topic that has existed alongthroughout history, reflecting the tension between freedom of speech and social rules.

Sounds smoother this way

Censorship could be shownan occur in different ways, starting from prohibition ofng art works, until to self-censorship from the artists themselves, who may be afraid of grudges or criticism.

This phenomenom don’es not just affect individual creativity, but also limits cultural and social speech that art can motivatediscussions inspired by art.

Often, censorship it’s justified for the sake of morality, politics or religion.

However, this restriction can lead to the losts of important voices and the homogenization of thought.

Artists such as Pablo Picasso and Frida Kahlo have both faced censorship at different times, but theiry resilience have open some place totly continued to produce art works that challenged conventionalism and motivate deep and inspired meaningful reflexctions about the human condition.

Art has the power tof questioning, provoke and, sometimes, incommodate.

Censorship, in the process of trying toby silenceing these voices, not justonly deprives society of enriching experiences, but also exposes the fear to the confrontation as wellcensor's fears.

TIn conclusion, the fight against censorship is, as a conclusion, a defense of creative freedom and a called out for the open and diversity in the artistic area.

Translation pPractice for IELTS tTopics 1

Censorship of aArt and aArtists ¶
The c¶
Censorship of art and artists is a complex topic that has existed alongthroughout history, reflecting the tension between freedom of speech and social rulenorms.

Don't forget capitalization rules for titles in English.

Censorship could be shown in different ways, startingan manifest itself in various ways, from prohibition of art works, until to self-censorship fromby the artists themselves, who may be afraid of grudgereprisals or criticism.

This phenomenomn doesn’t just affect individual creativity, but also limits the cultural and social speechdialogue that art can motivafoster.

Often, censorship it’s justified for the sake of morality, politics, or religion.

The serial comma is optional, but I prefer it for clarity.

However, this restriction can lead to the losts of important voices and homogenization of thought.

Artists such as Pablo Picasso and Frida Kahlo have faced censorship at different times, but their resilience have open some places lead to art works that challenge conventionalism and motivat and provoke deep reflexions abouton the human condition.

Art has the power tof questioning,, to provoke, and, someat times, incomodateto cause discomfort.

Censorship, in the process of trying to silence these voices, not justonly deprives society of enriching experiences, but also exposes thea fear to the confrontationing them as well.

In an ideal world, art should be a safe space for exploration and expression, where differences are celebrated instead of being repressed.

The fight against censorship is, as a conclusion, therefore a defense of creative freedom and a called out for the openness and diversity in the artistic arealm.