March 24, 2025
TOEFL Integrated Writing
The reading passage argues that having many options to choose from can benefit society. On the other hand, the lecturer opposes the ideas in the reading by presenting several counterarguments.
First of all, the lecturer contends that having too many options will not always make our lives easier. He explains that numerous choices can make people mentally exhausted. People have to evaluate all the products when they are given a lot of options to choose. However, this consumes enormous amount of energy, making them less likely to make a good choice. In addition, low productivity is achieved if they think about it long enough. This directly challenges the author’s assertion that having a lot of option makes our lives easier.
Secondly, the professor argues that having a lot choice does not result in innovation or progress. This is mainly because that companies might not focus on their advertisements rather than the quality of their products. He mentions that companies are going to focus more on their products’ appearances and advertisements to attract people. Therefore, many products will have poor quality. In the end, innovation will not be achieved. This goes against the article’s claim that having many choices leads innovation and progress.
Finally, the speaker refutes the idea that obtaining a lot options allow people to personally grow and develop. The reason is that having many options can make people lazy. He mentions that people are less likely to seek other new options or alternatives when they are given an enormous options. As a result they will not personally grow. This contradicts the author’s claim that having many choices allows people to self-develop.
TOEFL Integrated Writing
The reading passage argues that having many options to choose from can benefit society.
On the other hand, the lecturer opposes the ideas in the reading by presenting several counterarguments.
First of all, the lecturer contends that having too many options will not always make our lives easier.
He explains that numerous choices can make people mentally exhausted.
People have to evaluate all the products when they are given a lot of options to choose.
Maybe consequences instead of products? That word doesn't sound right here but I don't know exactly what you want to say. Unless you are specifically talking about shopping decisions.
However, tThis consumes enormous amount of energy, making them less likely to make a good choice.
In addition, low productivity is achievlowered if they think about it long enough.
Just preference, I think it sounds more natural
This directly challenges the author’s assertion that having a lot of options makes our lives easier.
Secondly, the professor argues that having a lot of choices does not result in innovation or progress.
This is mainly because that companies might not focus on their advertisements, rather than the quality of their products.
I think this is what you wanted to say
He mentions that companies are going to focus more on their products’ appearances and advertisements to attract people.
Therefore, many products will have poor quality.
In the end, innovation will not be achieved.
This goes against the article’s claim that having many choices leads innovation and progress.
Finally, the speaker refutes the idea that obtaining a lothaving many options allows people to personally grow and develop.
He mentions that people are less likely to seek other new options or alternatives when they are given man enormousy options.
As a result they will not personally grow.
This contradicts the author’s claim that having many choices allows people to self-develop.
Feedback
Good work! I think the main thing was just difficulty with the plural of options, which is admittedly tricky. You can say "many options", "a large amount of options", "a lot of choice", "many choices"... there are a lot of different ways to say it and it is not intuitive.
TOEFL Integrated Writing
The reading passage argues that having many options to choose from can benefit society.
On the other hand, the lecturer opposes the ideas in the reading by presenting several counterarguments.
First of all, the lecturer contends that having too many options will not always make our lives easier.
He explains that numerous choices can make people feel mentally exhausted.
People have to evaluate all the products when they are given a lot of options to choose.
However, this consumes an enormous amount of energy, making them less likely to make a good choice.
You can also say make a good decision
In addition, low productivity is achieved if they think about it too long enough.
Secondly, the professor argues that having a lot choice does not result in innovation or progress.
In English lecturer and professor is not the same title (lecturer only teach, professor have a PhD and carry research/mentoring responsibility), so be careful about mixing the two.
This is mainly because that companies might not focus on their advertisements rather than the quality of their products.
I am confused by this sentence.
You could say "This is because companies might focus on their advertisements rather than the quality ...", because your sentence currently reads that the company does not care about advertisement, and they care about products.
He mentions that companies are going to focus more on their products’ appearances and advertisements to attract people.
Therefore, many products will have poorer quality.
You are making a comparison here: because companies focus more on advertisement, products will be poorer.
|
TOEFL Integrated Writing This sentence has been marked as perfect! This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
The reading passage argues that having many options to choose from can benefit society. This sentence has been marked as perfect! This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
On the other hand, the lecturer opposes the ideas in the reading by presenting several counterarguments. This sentence has been marked as perfect! This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
First of all, the lecturer contends that having too many options will not always make our lives easier. This sentence has been marked as perfect! This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
He explains that numerous choices can make people mentally exhausted. He explains that numerous choices can make people feel mentally exhausted. This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
People have to evaluate all the products when they are given a lot of options to choose. This sentence has been marked as perfect! People have to evaluate all the products when they are given a lot of options to choose. Maybe consequences instead of products? That word doesn't sound right here but I don't know exactly what you want to say. Unless you are specifically talking about shopping decisions. |
|
However, this consumes enormous amount of energy, making them less likely to make a good choice. However, this consumes an enormous amount of energy, making them less likely to make a good choice. You can also say make a good decision
|
|
In addition, low productivity is achieved if they think about it long enough. In addition, low productivity is achieved if they think about it too long In addition, Just preference, I think it sounds more natural |
|
This directly challenges the author’s assertion that having a lot of option makes our lives easier. This directly challenges the author’s assertion that having a lot of options makes our lives easier. |
|
Secondly, the professor argues that having a lot choice does not result in innovation or progress. Secondly, the professor argues that having a lot choice does not result in innovation or progress. In English lecturer and professor is not the same title (lecturer only teach, professor have a PhD and carry research/mentoring responsibility), so be careful about mixing the two. Secondly, the professor argues that having a lot of choices does not result in innovation or progress. |
|
This is mainly because that companies might not focus on their advertisements rather than the quality of their products. This is mainly because I am confused by this sentence. You could say "This is because companies might focus on their advertisements rather than the quality ...", because your sentence currently reads that the company does not care about advertisement, and they care about products. This is mainly because I think this is what you wanted to say |
|
He mentions that companies are going to focus more on their products’ appearances and advertisements to attract people. This sentence has been marked as perfect! This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
Therefore, many products will have poor quality. Therefore, many products will have poorer quality. You are making a comparison here: because companies focus more on advertisement, products will be poorer. This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
In the end, innovation will not be achieved. This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
This goes against the article’s claim that having many choices leads innovation and progress. This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
Finally, the speaker refutes the idea that obtaining a lot options allow people to personally grow and develop. Finally, the speaker refutes the idea that |
|
The reason is that having many options can make people lazy. |
|
He mentions that people are less likely to seek other new options or alternatives when they are given an enormous options. He mentions that people are less likely to seek other new options or alternatives when they are given man |
|
As a result they will not personally grow. This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
This contradicts the author’s claim that having many choices allows people to self-develop. This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
You need LangCorrect Premium to access this feature.
Go Premium