Jan. 22, 2025
TOEFL Integrated
The reading passage argues that there are three potential benefits to colonizing asteroids. On the other hand, the lecturer opposes the ideas in the reading with several counterarguments.
First of all, the lecturer contends that scientific fields might not gain advantages from the colonization. He explains that scientists lack knowledge about asteroids. They have an insufficient understanding about asteroids that it is too early to project their benefits. Therefore, we cannot be sure if the asteroid colonization benefits scientifically. This directly challenges the author’s claim that colonizing asteroids enhances the scientific areas.
Secondly, the professor argues that colonizing asteroids does not benefit the economic growth and development. This is because scientists do not know how much minerals or ores exist in asteroids. Therefore, we cannot conclude whether it is more cost-effective to mine in space than using conventional mining. As a result, colonizing asteroids might not create more jobs or stimulate the economy. This contradicts the reading’s claim that asteroid colonization can drive the economic boom.
Finally, the speaker refutes the idea that the colonization potentially provides shelter for humankind. The reason is, most asteroids are much smaller than the Earth. Therefore, people will struggle living there due to low gravity. Their bones will shrink and become weak, making it uncomfortable and challenging to live there. This undermines the author’s assertion that asteroids can be a perfect refuge.
TOEFL Integrated
The reading passage argues that there are three potential benefits to colonizing asteroids.
On the other hand, the lecturer opposes the ideas in the reading with several counter arguments.
First of all, the lecturer contends that scientific fields might not gain advantages from the colonization.
He explains that scientists lack knowledge about asteroids.
They have an insufficient understanding about asteroids and that it is too early to project theirits benefits.
Therefore, we cannot be sure if the asteroid colonization benefits scientificallyce.
This directly challenges the author’s claim that colonizing asteroids enhances the scientific areas / knowledge.
Secondly, the professor argues that colonizing asteroids does not benefit the economic growth and development.
This is because scientists do not know how much minerals or ores exist in asteroids.
Therefore, we cannot conclude whether it is more cost-effective to mine in space than usingor to use conventional mining methods.
As a result, colonizing asteroids might not create more jobs or stimulate the economy.
This contradicts the readingarticle’s claim that asteroid colonization can drive the economic boom.
Finally, the speaker refutes the idea that the colonization potentially provides shelter for humankind.
The reason is, most asteroids are much smaller than the Earth.
Therefore, people will struggle living there due to low gravity.
Their bones will shrink and become weak, making it uncomfortable and challenging to live there.
This undermines the author’s assertion that asteroids can be a perfect refuge.
|
TOEFL Integrated This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
The reading passage argues that there are three potential benefits to colonizing asteroids. This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
On the other hand, the lecturer opposes the ideas in the reading with several counterarguments. On the other hand, the lecturer opposes the ideas in the reading with several counter arguments. |
|
First of all, the lecturer contends that scientific fields might not gain advantages from the colonization. This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
He explains that scientists lack knowledge about asteroids. This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
They have an insufficient understanding about asteroids that it is too early to project their benefits. They have an insufficient understanding about asteroids and that it is too early to project |
|
Therefore, we cannot be sure if the asteroid colonization benefits scientifically. Therefore, we cannot be sure if |
|
This directly challenges the author’s claim that colonizing asteroids enhances the scientific areas. This directly challenges the author’s claim that colonizing asteroids enhances |
|
Secondly, the professor argues that colonizing asteroids does not benefit the economic growth and development. Secondly, the professor argues that colonizing asteroids does not benefit |
|
This is because scientists do not know how much minerals or ores exist in asteroids. This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
Therefore, we cannot conclude whether it is more cost-effective to mine in space than using conventional mining. Therefore, we cannot conclude whether it is more cost-effective to mine in space |
|
As a result, colonizing asteroids might not create more jobs or stimulate the economy. This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
This contradicts the reading’s claim that asteroid colonization can drive the economic boom. This contradicts the |
|
Finally, the speaker refutes the idea that the colonization potentially provides shelter for humankind. This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
The reason is, most asteroids are much smaller than the Earth. This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
Therefore, people will struggle living there due to low gravity. This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
Their bones will shrink and become weak, making it uncomfortable and challenging to live there. This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
This undermines the author’s assertion that asteroids can be a perfect refuge. This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
You need LangCorrect Premium to access this feature.
Go Premium