Have you ever thought about your privileges as a person living nowadayin these times?

I mean, just think about that.

The original sentence is very casual and causes a bit of a tonal shift in your language so I deleted it for consistency's sake. If you're going to use words like "whilst" and "indeed," you should try to keep the tone formal.

Book aWould you like to book an appointment with the dentist or, reserve a table in a restaurant, order takeout or choose a new pair of jeans?

Order a takeaway or choose a new pair of jeans?

I feel as if the writing here is very inconsistent so, for expediency's sake, I'm going to correct the rest without comments.

EveryAll things and more can now be done right from our sofas.

Isn’t that great?

The problem is, the Internet and other technologies have not only provided us with comfort and convenience but with inevitable problemsproblems such as inequality, unrealistic standards of beauty, FOMO syndrome and depression, etc ...

Inequality and unrealistic standards of beauty, FOMO syndrome and depression, the list goes on.

Even though today we can comego to a supermarket and choose between hundreds of brands, often we can’t choose just because there are just too many of themchoices.

I bet oOur ancestors probably couldn’t imagine such a thing as the inability to choose in their tougharsh and adventurperilous lifeves.

Indeed, while you runif you are running from a tiger, thinking about what you are supposed to eat today (if athe tiger won’t eat you), there’s not much time at all to complain about anything else.

Even if they had time to complain, they wouldn’t have been ranting about abundant choices —but, rather, about the lack of food.

That is to say, while on the one side of the planet people are starving from hunger or only making ends meet, someone on the other side struggles because they can’t choose something in their daily life.

The problem of choice occurs when there’s an excess of resources, and by that, I meanit's not only t-shirts, letters, toys, and stuffed animals, but anything.

Eventually, we are no longer able to choose not only a career or a place tof livinge but even friends and partners.

With the prevalence of the Internet, we gotpossess unlimited access to online dating apps and porn sites, resulting in a tremendous amount of possible partners.

In comparison with our parents, we can’t anymore just meet someone on a street or at a party, huang out for a while, and get married any more, because we won’t be satisfied with that.

Numerous amounts of possible paramours just don’t let us take a break from swiping online.

You're overusing the word "just."

First, you get an unlimited choice of items, whether it’s fashionable dresses or brand- new televisions.

Wait, but why do you think like that?

Well, onIt's probably because you caught sight of other items in the shop —which are more expensive, “cool” or just more flashyier.

Well, what should we do with the modern curse of choice?

We both know that youYou probably would depart to the forest if only if there were at least WIFI, an ATM, and a decent hotel.

What I would suggest is somethingthe opposite — stay where you are.

Just wWhenever you swipe on Amazon or Tinder, think about that: how many hundreds of swipes will it take to find what you like?

What is thatObjectively, what is “what you like” objectively?

Is it possible that it’s not you who’s swiping, choosing people or goods, but it's the big brands who are swiping you, like pawns?

Think about that the next time you again would bare unable to choose, and maybe that time and with thatis knowledge you wouldn’t liken't jump on thate treadmill of choosing thatfrom so much.

I mean, just think about thait.

"just think about that" is perfectly fine but "just think about it" is like a fixed expression

We can get on a plane and move to any spot on the planet in no time, whilste watching a premiere blockbuster in a comfortable chair.

"whilst" is very old-fashioned, avoid it

Book a dentist or reserve a table in a restaurant?!

Order a takeaway or choose a new pair of jeans?!

Even though today we can comego to a supermarket and choose between hundreds of brands, often we can’t choose just because there are just too many of them.

I bet our ancestors couldn’t imagine such a thing as the inability to choosebeing overwhelmed by choices back in their tough and adventurous lifeves.

"inability" doesn't quite work here -- we're *able* to choose, it's just *hard* to do

Indeed, whilen you're running from a tiger, thinking about what you are supposed to eat today (if aassuming the tiger wodoesn’t eat you), there’s not much time at all to complain about anything.

match running -> thinking

It would sound funny if it waseren’t so sad.

There's an old grammar rule some people follow -- after "if" use "weren't" instead of "wasn't" when speaking hypothetically.
(Concrete) If he isn't rich, he must not be important.
(Hypothetical) If he weren't so rich, he wouldn't be so important.

Eventually, we are no longer able to choose not only a career or a place tof livinge but even friends and partners.

In comparison withntrast to our parents, we can’t anymore no longer just meet someone on a street or at a party, huang out for a while, and get married, because we won’t be satisfied with that.

"can't anymore just" - for some reason this doesn't work, I'm not sure why

Wait, but why do you think like that?

Well, only because you caught sight of other items in the shop — more expensive, “cooler” or just more flashyflashier items.

What I would suggest is somethingthe opposite — stay where you are.

Just whenever you swipe on Amazon or Tinder, think about that: how many hundreds of swipes will it take to find what you like?

What is that “what you like” objectively?

Is it possible that it’s not you who’s swiping, choosing people or goods, but big brands who are swiping you, like a pawns?

not you who -> but big brands who

Think about that the next time you are again would be unable to choose, and maybe that time and with that knowledge you wouldn’t like thate treadmill of choosing thatso much.

Have you ever thought about your privileges as a person living nowathese days?

I mean, just think about thait.

The problem is, the Internet and other technologies have not only provided us with comfort and convenience, but with inevitable problems.

Even though today we can comego to a supermarket and choose betweenwith hundreds of brands, often we can’t choose just because there are just too many of them.

I bet our ancestors couldn’t imagine such a thing as the inability to choose"paradox of choice" in their tough and adventurous life.

This 'inability to choose' because there is too much to choose from is called the "paradox of choice". It helps to use this phrase here, to make clear the 'inability to chose

Indeed, while you run from a tiger, thinking about what you are supposed to eat today (if athe tiger won’doesn't eat you first), there’s not much time at all to complain about anythings.

That is to say, while on the one side of the planet people are starving from hunger or only making ends meeruggling to find enough food to eat, someone on the other side is strugglesing because they can’t choose something in their lifewhat to eat.

The original sentence _works_, but I think this correction is closer to what you wanted to do. Creating a strong contrast by having "struggling" reflected in both sentences.

For poor or disadvantaged people, it may sound not only ridiculous, but insulting.

MeanwhileBut, it is the reality of what’s going on today in the world.

"meanwhile" makes things sound unrelated; "but" sets up a contrast.

Eventually, we are no longer able to choose n. Not only abetween careers or a place ofs to livinge, but even friends and partners.

In comparison withUnlike our parents, we can’t anymore just meet someone on a street, or at a party, huang out for a while, and then get married, because we won’t be satisfied with just that.

NumerousThe innumerable amounts of possible paramours just dwon’'t let us take a break from swiping online.

Even if, for a while, we stick to one partner, this endless online black hole is too appealing, mesmerizing us with promising perspectives and even more affectionate lovers.

Noneevertheless, why should we limit ourselves, especially when so many people get tricked into the consumeristic Samsara wheel?

Then you choose something and buy it, only to think shortly thereafter that this thing isn’t good enough for you.

Wait, butBut wait, why do you think like that?

Well, only bBecause you caught sight of other items in the shop — more expensive, more “cool” or just more flashy.

Well, what should we do with theis modern curse of choice?

We both know that you would only depart tofor the forest if only there wereas at least WIFI, an ATM, and a decent hotel.

Just whenever you swipe on Amazon or Tinder, think about thatis: how many hundreds of swipes will it take to find what you like?

What is it, that “what you like”, objectively?

What if you never find it here?

Is it possible that it’s not you who’s swiping, choosing people or goods, but big brands who are swiping you, like pawns?

TSo think about that, next time you again would befind yourself unable to choose, a. And maybe, thatis time and, with that knowledge, you wouldn’t liken't get on that treadmill of choosing that much.