March 26, 2024
The late Bronze Age Collapse.
The article and the lecture are about the paradox of the late Bronze Age Collapse. The author gives a few theories how that could happen. At the same time the lecturer explains why these theories are not the cause and explanation of the Collapse.
The first theory suggests that climate changes could have led to natural disasters, drought and famine. The author claims that the concatenation of all these factors could be the cause of the weakening of civilizations and could have made the governments too vulnerable. The lecturer does not agree with this statement and considers the fact that this theory is unclear to historians. And moreover, there weren’t any examples of collapsing of many civilizations at the same time. No massive Simultaneous examples of civilization collapses were recorded by historians.
Secondly, the article notes the theory of intervention from outside, that could occur by pirates called “Sea People”. Their advanced sailing and military skills may have allowed them disrupt trade routes weaking and destroying civilizations. On the other hand, even though the lecturer agrees that Sea People were very dangerous, but their attacks weren’t unified, because they were small groups of pirates. The local armies could prevent their attacks successfully enough.
Finally, the author suggests the theory that instability of the political and economic systems of the time could have led to collapse. The centralized power in the hands of rulers, in turn, could be the reason of the dissatisfaction and rebellion. But, in contrast, the lecturer claims that this phenomenon wasn’t unique for the Bronze Age. Many societies of the time were politically instable, but not all of them collapsed. For instance, the Assyrians had the same problems but they were able to avoid the collapse.
The lLate Bronze Age Collapse.
The article and the lecture are about the paradox of the lLate Bronze Age Collapse.
The author gives a few theories about how thait could have happened.
At the same time the lecturer explains why these theories are not the cause and explanation ofcannot account for the Ccollapse.
The first theory suggests that climate changes could have led to natural disasters, drought and famine.
The author claims that the concatenation of all these factors could be the cause of the weakening of civilizations and could have made the governments too vulnerable.
The lecturer does not agree with this statement and considers the fact that this theory is unclear to historians.
I'm not sure what you mean by 'this theory is unclear to historians'
And mMoreover, there weren’t anyare no other examples of collapsing of many civilizations collapsing at the same time.
No examples of massive Ssimultaneous examples of civilization collapses were have been recorded by historians.
Secondly, the article notementions the theory of intervention from outside, that could occurhave been brought about by pirates called “Sea People”.
Their advanced sailing and military skills may have allowed them disrupt trade routes, weakening and destroying civilizations.
On the other hand, even though the lecturer agrees that Sea People were very dangerous, but their attacks weren’t unified, because they were small groups of pirates.
The local armies could prevent their attacks successfully enough.
Finally, the author suggests the theory that instability of the political and economic systems of the time could have led to collapse.
The cCentralized power in the hands of rulers, in turn, could be the reason of thefor dissatisfaction and rebellion.
But, in contrastHowever, the lecturer claims that this phenomenon wasn’t unique forto the Bronze Age.
Many societies of the time were politically instable, but not all of them collapsed.
For instance, the Assyrians had the same problems, but they were able to avoid the collapse.
|
No massive Simultaneous examples of civilization collapses were recorded by historians. No examples of massive |
|
Secondly, the article notes the theory of intervention from outside, that could occur by pirates called “Sea People”. Secondly, the article |
|
Their advanced sailing and military skills may have allowed them disrupt trade routes weaking and destroying civilizations. Their advanced sailing and military skills may have allowed them disrupt trade routes, weakening and destroying civilizations. |
|
The late Bronze Age Collapse. The |
|
The article and the lecture are about the paradox of the late Bronze Age Collapse. The article and |
|
The author gives a few theories how that could happen. The author gives a few theories about how |
|
At the same time the lecturer explains why these theories are not the cause and explanation of the Collapse. At the same time the lecturer explains why these theories |
|
The first theory suggests that climate changes could have led to natural disasters, drought and famine. This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
The author claims that the concatenation of all these factors could be the cause of the weakening of civilizations and could have made the governments too vulnerable. This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
The lecturer does not agree with this statement and considers the fact that this theory is unclear to historians. The lecturer does not agree with this statement and considers the fact that this theory is unclear to historians. I'm not sure what you mean by 'this theory is unclear to historians' |
|
And moreover, there weren’t any examples of collapsing of many civilizations at the same time.
|
|
On the other hand, even though the lecturer agrees that Sea People were very dangerous, but their attacks weren’t unified, because they were small groups of pirates. On the other hand, even though the lecturer agrees that Sea People were very dangerous, |
|
The local armies could prevent their attacks successfully enough. This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
Finally, the author suggests the theory that instability of the political and economic systems of the time could have led to collapse. This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
The centralized power in the hands of rulers, in turn, could be the reason of the dissatisfaction and rebellion.
|
|
But, in contrast, the lecturer claims that this phenomenon wasn’t unique for the Bronze Age.
|
|
Many societies of the time were politically instable, but not all of them collapsed. This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
For instance, the Assyrians had the same problems but they were able to avoid the collapse. For instance, the Assyrians had the same problems, but they were able to avoid |
You need LangCorrect Premium to access this feature.
Go Premium