The How to mMake pPeople aAngry sSeries

Last weekend, I binge-watched the series ‘"How to mMake pPeople aAngry’."

Each skits is simple and short, so it’s easy to understand even for Japanese learners.

If a noun is described by "each," it's always singular.

You don’t have to pick up complicated contexts at all.

わー、すごい！
また、
You don’t have to pick up nuanced context at all.

Each technique has its own name and it is often shown in the beginning of a skit.

また、
Each technique has its own name and it is often shown at the beginning of a skit.

This makes us guess at what will happens in a skit.

■Realistic situation atmospheres

I think I know what you're trying to say but we wouldn't really use "atmosphere" with "realistic situations" in the US. "Realistic situations" is enough for us to understand,

The situations and atmosphere in this series are so realistic.

Actually, it'sthey're the opposite.

EThis even makinges us feel thatas if people in real life would react more.

また、
- Actually, they're the opposite - even making us feel as if people in real life would react more.
- Actually, they're the opposite: even making us feel as if people in real life would react more.

The actors in this series have done an amazing job to createing an awkward yet realistic atmosphere in Japanese daily life and an office.

We don't usually use "daily life" in the US so I removed that part. It still makes sense without it.

In the lecture segments, the professor tells us about the techniques with convincing speech in a logical and academic manner.

また、
- In the lecture segments, the professor tells us about the techniques with convincing academic speech which sounds logical.

His speech is solelylectures were written solely for this series, but, at the same time, makes enough sense to make us believe it's real research.

verb agreement

The How to mMake pPeople aAngry series

I suggest using Title case to make it clearer: "When using title case, all words are capitalized, except for minor words that are not the first or last word of the title."

Last weekend, I binge-watched the series ‘How to mMake pPeople aAngry’.

Great vocabulary with binge-watched :)

This is aIt's a hilarious Japanese comedy series from the 2000s.

You could combine the two sentences to be more descriptive.

It’s hilarious.

As above.

I think this it's good learning material for Japanese learners, so I hope this will help.

I'd move the reasons why you recommend it directly below this statement. [Statement] + [Reason] = it's good learning material + why.

Fortunately, you can watch many videos from the series on the original creator’s YouTube channels.

Suggest moving this below the reasons for logical flow.

LFirst, lectures by a professor who has researchesd how to make people angry.

Second, skits demonstrating techniques to make people angry.

Each skits is simple and short, so it’s easy to understand even for beginner Japanese learners.

Skit: singular. Added level.

You don’t have to pick up complicated contexts at allThe context of each skit aren't too complicated to understand.

Each technique has its own name and it is often shown inat the beginning of a skit.

Congratulations on using 'its' correctly 😁 That's a tricky one!

This makes us guessIt gives a hint of what happens in a skit.

Sometimes the name itself is funny already.

■Realistic situation atmospheres

The actors are not overly dramatic at all compared to other comedic or non-comedic series.

Actually, it's the opposite.

Even making us feelSuggesting that people in real life would react more.

The actors in this series have done an amazing job to create an awkward yet realistic atmosphere in Japanese daily life and an officoffice and daily life.

Edited this so it's referring to both 'office life' and 'daily life'

In the lecture segments, the professor tells us about the techniques with convincing speech in a logical and academic manner.

Do you know the phrase "show not tell"? By saying logical and academic you're showing us it's convincing.

His speech is solely writteWhile it's all a work of fiction for thise series, but at the same time,it makes enough sense to make us believe it's real research.

Ohhh 😲 I thought it was real research! Maybe you could introduce the idea that it's fake research earlier? It sounds like it might be a 'mockumentary'.