The greatness of an individuals

In our human race, we always admire the exceptionality of individuals and their great work.

However, the deciding factors for identifications ofying these exceptional personsople are assessed differently in different ages.

This prompt is recommending one the factors regarding this exceptionality where I strongly agree with this recommendation.

Sorry, I don't know what you mean here.

In a certaineach era, we can find different kinds of talented and ambitious individuals that seems impeccable, and no one seems not to cross that barrierable to outdo them.

But within a few decades, we can see another perfectionist who crosses theat barrier and surpriseds us.

This is because of the determination, hunger and resources varieds in different ages.

For example, Shahid Afridi once scored a hundred within 37 balls and become the owner ofobtained the record ofor the quickest hundred in cricket history and, but later those records awere broken by different batsmen.

Obviously, the increased availability of resources and improvement of thein technologiesy and rules makde it more possible.

Nonetheless, it is always important to wait for athe time being, tobefore consider ing someone great, exceptional and perfect.

Contemporaries aredo not always posedface a significant amount of challenges, for various reasons.

This is fine, but it sounds more natural to use active voice ('contemporaries do not always face a significant amount of challenges') over passive ('contemporaries are not always posed...')

That age might be full of different agendas, lack of resources, lack of enough reason “why’’, or paucity of determination.

In the time of Pele and Maradona-, there were other sports with a lot of attention, the world was rebuilding after wWorld wWar II and the cCold wWar, and the lack of resources and bad rules awere strongly demotivating factors tof the growth of a player.

That’s howwhy we don’t find any better contemporaries that canould contend with these two great players.

In the case of other fields, Albert Eienstein, and Stephaen Hawkings, are the paragon fors in the field of science fiel, and and since now their contribution cannot be crossedoutdone by any other individuals and that’s how, they are still considered great to datey.

InAmong political paragons, Skeikh Mujibur Rahman from Bangladesh, Abraham lLincoln from the USA and many others are considered great for the same reason.

Remember to capitalize names.

It would not be imperfect as well as would diminish their hunger and determination.

I am not sure what you mean by 'It would not be imperfect'

But in some cases, we can consider someone asthe greatest in the human race in a particular field.

One of the examples is are Messi and Ronaldo, who are doing great things every day in the football field and crossesing their own barrierhurdles every day and d. Declaring them great doesn’t losediminish their hunger and determination in a minuscule scat alel.

'Hurdles' sounds better than 'barriers' here. 'Hurdles' has more of a sense of a challenge.

Considering all theseis, I strongly believe that, it is more appropriate to consider oneself assomeone a great individual after waiting a certain period of time, and after that when no one still crosses him, if nobody exceeds him by then, safely declare him as a perfectionist in his own field – rather than quickly reach theing a conclusion by comparing him with his contemporaries.