My fFavorite sSuperhero mMovie

Generally, all words in a title are capitalised.

I want to make an argument or acceptance debate above theff the top of my head.

(1) "Acceptance debate" is not an expression we use. Just "argument" will sufice.
(2) off the top of one's head: on the spot, without prior preparation.

Everyone likes (the) movies that are watched at his or her leisure time.

The phrase is just "at one's leisure". Alternatively: "Everyone likes the movies that are watched IN his or her leisure time."

Some movies can givmake us happy, or sad, or give us encouragement and life lessons from the life.

[I means the advantages only give movies.]?

It is unclear what this sentence is supposed to mean. Perhaps you can provide clarification in a comment in the form of native text.

Among them, most of young people around the world are prefer superhero movies like Marvel and DC.

Those are based on comic books and I think every 90's -born people mayrson would like them.

(1) The noun that follows after "every" is singular: "every time", "everything", "every night", etc.
(2) In my opinion, "would" sounds more natural than "may" here.

I recently watched a movie that thwhose title is 'Superman'.

(1) "Recently" refers to a time in the past, so "watched" (past tense) is expected.
(2) "A movie whose title is 'Superman'" may sound unnecessarily wordy. Alternatively: "I recently watched a movie titled 'Superman'." or "I recently watched a movie called 'Superman'."

This iIt was a reboot version for 2025.

I think this sounds more natural.

Before this movie, the WB company was faced a failure state onwith many DC uUniverse movies like 'Wonder wWoman 2', 'Black Adam', etc...

(1) "DC Universe is the name of a franchise. Proper capitalisation should be observed.
(2) Similarly, "Wonder Woman 2" is the title of a movie, so you should also capitalise it properly.
(3) "etc." means "and so on". The ellipsis might be a little awkward and is not required here.

Therefore, WB company decided to reboot DC uUniverse within a new form to compete with Marvel.

(1) It has already been established in the previous sentence that WB is a company, so we don't have to say "(the) WB company" anymore.
(2) The phrase is "compete with (someone)".

'Superman' movie is the important for the first step ofor the DC Universe.

For the same reason you don't have to say "(the) WB company", you also don't have to say "(the) 'Superman' movie" anymore.

Therefore, WB choose a person who can handle the whole project,: his name is 'James Gunn'.

(1) WB choosing the director is something that happened in the past, so the past tense ("chose") is expected.
(2) We do not use quotation marks around the names of people.

He is a popular director in Hollywood and also the director of the 'GOTG' franchise movies atmovies set in the Marvel cCinematic uUniverse.

"Marvel Cinematic Universe" is the name of a franchise, so like "DC Universe", it should be properly capitalised.

Ok, let's stop the preface.

A comma would be more natural here.

What I really want to saytalk about is my 'Superman' movie review.

We do not use "say about" here. "Say about" might instead be used in a sentence like "What did he say about me?"

Firstly, I want to saytalk about the main character 'Superman' aka 'Clark- Kent'.

(1) Again, we do not use quotation marks around names when referring to the person.
(2) There is no hyphen in "Clark Kent".

He is very likelysimilar to a real world superhero character.

He has a kindhearted and warmly smile owhen face foring the public who are ordinary people.

(1) "Warmly" is an adverb. "Warm" is the adjective.
(2) I rephrased the second half of your sentence so that it sounds more natural.

He doesn't want to happen hurt as well assee human ands or even animals get hurt.

Fixed grammar issues and made the sentence sound natural.

[He can sharply art at the movie.]?

I'm unsure what you meant by this sentence. Perhaps you can also clarify this.

Another one is 'Lex Luthor' actor.

Lex Luthor is a fictional character, not an actor. Since you're talking about characters, it might not make sense to talk about the actor, especially since you used the phrase "another one" ("another character").

He is very strong onas a villain character bythrough (the) acting.

We will see the anger and jealous mind on his face the whole movie.

Alternatively: "We will see the anger and jealousy on his face the whole movie."

I think the good moment ofhighlight of the movie is him.

Another thing: the side actors are alsolso have good acting skills and they can show their performance evenabilities despite the short runtime.

The most likelyenjoyable character for me is Krypto, whicho is 'a dog from Kryptothe planet Krypto' aka 'Supergirl's puppy'.

For animals (especially if they're named characters), we use "who" instead of "which".

I think he carries the whole movie carrier one is him.

I'm not 100% sure about what you meant by this sentence, but I took my best guess. Also note that the use of "carry" here might tend more towards slang.

He is very cute and annoying but his performance is so precious.

"Annoy" is a verb. "Annoying" is the adjective.

I've decided to give mya rating isof 9/10.

Although I think this movie is good at fighting and flying scences, it cannot attract's not enough for me to watch double timestwice like 'End Ggame'.

(1) Alternatively: "Although I think this movie is good during fighting and flying scenes".
(2) I rephrased the second half of the sentence so it sounds more natural.
(3) "Endgame" is one word in the official movie title.

I want to make an argument or acceptance debate above theoff the top of my head.

Some movies can givmake us happy, sad, or encourage us and lessons from the lifeprovide life lessons.

I means the advantages only give movies.

Among them, most of the young people around the world are prefer superhero movies like Marvel and DC.

Those are based on comic books and I think every 90's born people may like them.

I recently watched a movie thatof which the title is 'Superman'.

Therefore, WB company decided to reboot the DC universe with anew form in order to compete with Marvel.

The 'Superman' movie is the important for the first step of the DC Universe.

Therefore, WB choose a person who can handle the whole project, name is 'James Gunn'.

I really want to say about isgive the 'Superman' movie a review.

Firstly, I want to saytalk about the main character 'Superman' aka 'Clark-Kent'.

He is very likelyned to a real world superhero character.

He has a kindhearted and warmly smile on his face forto the public who are ordinary people.

He doesn't want to happen hurt as well assee that humans and even animals are hurt.

Another one is the 'Lex Luthor' actor.

He is very strong onas a villain character bythrough acting.

Another sidmention is that the actors are also have good acting skills and they can show their performance even in a short runtime.

The most likelyenjoyable character for me is Krypto which is 'a dog from Krypto planet' aka 'Supergirl's puppy'.

He is very cute and annoying but his performance is so precious.

I decide to give my rating is, 9/10.

Although I think this movie is good at fighting and flying scences, it cannot attract make me to watch double times like 'End Game'.