liya_allien's avatar
liya_allien

Feb. 9, 2023

0
The Death of Grammar

It’s said that today communication through instant messengers is surpassing other ways of communication. People get used to sending emojis instead of complete sentences and recording voices instead of sending emails. Some consider this situation truly dangerous and have an assumption that instant messaging may lead to the death of grammar and spelling rules at some point. Even though those fears aren’t groundless in general, I can’t agree with this idea. I don’t think we’ll lose our ability to communicate properly only because developing technologies let us send emojis instead of words. 

We certainly can do without proper grammar and spelling on the whole. Now that we have Snapchat, Telegram and Instagram, why should we bother ourselves with what’s happening with a language? Just look at modern teenagers who practically live on their phones, ignoring reality and spending all their time online. I have two 12-year-old nieces who live in different countries and don’t know each other; nevertheless, both of them do the same thing at the same time, namely stick to the screens of their smartphones, watching videos, recording voice messages, making selfies, and doing whatever else they might think of. It seems to me that if their parents just let them, these girls would spend all their time with phones, and I hope that the situation won’t get to this point one day. 

That said, I still don’t think we should panic and take away phones from children and adults in order to defend proper grammar and spelling. First of all, it’s cruel. Secondly, it even sounds unrealistic; I won’t give you my phone, for example. So, what should be done? What will help us to preserve correct grammar and spelling in the chaos and craziness of online chats, bots, and apps that are presumably destroying our languages right now? Well, I think we have to put things in perspective in this matter.

At the very heart of any educational system are universities and colleges which are meant to be temples of knowledge and wisdom. It seems to me that professors and lecturers won't let education fall to its lowest level. It's true that education is a worthwhile opportunity to enlighten one’s mind. That being said, in order to get a degree, anyone has to go through various exams and assessments, among which are making calculations, writing essays, and so on. To put it simply, the very concept of education implies willingness to solve tasks, obey restrictions and study rules whether it's laws of math or it's laws of grammar. With this kind of restrictions and goals, we’ll lose proper grammar and spelling only when we lose our education.

A second large group of people who won’t let grammar and spelling die is language learners. There’s no shortage of people who are deeply interested in learning languages, and among their goals are usually correct writing and spelling. If so many of us desire to be fluent in foreign languages, how can we lose them? Indeed, that doesn’t mean that we always can produce foreign writing and speech correctly. However, the desire to learn itself protects us from the danger of ignorance. Additionally, language learners begin with learning the basics, which means they pick up slang and acronyms much later, if they do this at all. I still can’t pick up idioms, not because I don’t like them but because I don’t need them as much as grammar. 

The third category of people who guarantee us that proper grammar and spelling won’t fade away down the road is writers and readers. There will always be people who value literature, choosing novels over messengers and old-fashioned essays over apps. Whether old literature, modern fiction, or even dictionaries, this layer of culture practically guarantees the preservation of proper grammar for us. On the flip side, there are also writers who like to experiment with the language, writing without punctuation or compiling books from online chats. However, by and large, they represent only a minimal cluster of writers. In general, people write according to recognized standards of grammar and punctuation. 

As a result, I don’t think we have to worry that grammar will disappear at some point, leaving us exposed to incomprehensible acronyms and emoji's sequences. Even though today we're using short messages, we still have to write formal emails to our bosses, communicate with our children’s teachers and speak clearly with our friends. You can say to your friend who’s chilling at your house, “LOL, have you seen this girl aka Ellen? Omg, she’s hot AF, a fucking dope.”, But in general, I think it's unlikely that this kind of communication will become a commonplace in the future. Even though we have room for simplified language in our culture today, it doesn’t mean that this kind of language will absorb all the others.


It’s said that today communication through instant messengers is surpassing other ways of communication. People get used to sending emojis instead of complete sentences and recording voice messages instead of sending emails. Some consider this situation truly dangerous and have the assumption that instant messaging may lead to the death of grammar and spelling rules at some point. Even though those fears aren’t groundless, I can’t agree with this idea. I don’t think we’ll lose our ability to communicate properly only because developing technologies let us send emojis instead of words. 

We certainly can do without proper grammar and spelling on the whole. Now that we have Snapchat, Telegram and Instagram, why should we bother ourselves with what’s happening with a language? Just look at modern teenagers who practically live on their phones, ignoring reality and spending all their time online. I have two 12-year-old nieces who live in different countries and don’t know each other; nevertheless, both of them do the same thing at the same time, namely stick to the screens of their smartphones, watching videos, recording voice messages, taking selfies, and doing whatever else they might think of. It seems to me that if their parents just let them, these girls would spend all their time with their phones, and I hope that the situation won’t ever get to this point. 

That said, I still don’t think we should panic and take away phones from children and adults in order to defend proper grammar and spelling. First of all, it’s cruel. Secondly, it sounds unrealistic; I won’t give up my phone, for example. So, what should be done? What will help us to preserve correct grammar and spelling in the chaos and craziness of online chats, bots, and apps that are presumably destroying our languages right now? Well, I think we have to put things in perspective on this matter.

At the very heart of any educational system are universities and colleges which are meant to be temples of knowledge and wisdom. It seems to me that professors and lecturers won't let education fall to its lowest level. It's true that education is a worthwhile opportunity to enlighten one’s mind. That being said, in order to get a degree, anyone has to go through various exams and assessments, among which are making calculations, writing essays, and so on. To put it simply, the very concept of education implies willingness to solve tasks, obey restrictions and study rules whether it's laws of math or it's laws of grammar. With these kinds of restrictions and goals, we’ll lose proper grammar and spelling only when we lose our education.

A second large group of people who won’t let grammar and spelling die are language learners. There’s no shortage of people who are deeply interested in learning languages, and among their goals are usually correct writing and spelling. If so many of us desire to be fluent in foreign languages, how can we lose them? Indeed, that doesn’t mean that we always can produce foreign writing and speech correctly. However, the desire to learn itself protects us from the danger of ignorance. Additionally, language learners begin with learning the basics, which means they pick up slang and acronyms much later, if they do this at all. I still can’t pick up idioms, not because I don’t like them but because I don’t need them as much as grammar. 

The third category of people who guarantee that proper grammar and spelling won’t fade away down the road is writers and readers. There will always be people who value literature, choosing novels over messengers and old-fashioned essays over apps. Whether old literature, modern fiction, or even dictionaries, this layer of culture practically guarantees the preservation of proper grammar. On the flip side, there are also writers who like to experiment with the language, writing without punctuation or compiling books from online chats. However, by and large, they represent only a minority of writers. In general, people write according to recognized standards of grammar and punctuation. 

As a result, I don’t think we have to worry that grammar will disappear at some point, leaving us exposed to incomprehensible acronyms and emoji sequences. Even though today we're using short messages, we still have to write formal emails to our bosses, communicate with our children’s teachers and speak clearly with our friends. You can say to your friend who’s chilling at your house, “LOL, have you seen this girl aka Ellen? Omg, she’s hot AF, fucking dope.”, But in general, I think it's unlikely that this kind of communication will become commonplace in the future. Even though we have room for simplified language in our culture today, it doesn’t mean that this kind of language will absorb all the others.

Corrections

The Death of Grammar

It’s said that today communication through instant messengers is surpassing other ways of communication.

People get used to sending emojis instead of complete sentences and recording voices instead of sending emails.

You could also say "recording their voices"

Some consider this situation truly dangerous and have anthe assumption that instant messaging may lead to the death of grammar and spelling rules at some point.

Even though those fears aren’t groundless in general, I can’t agree with this idea.

I don’t think we’ll lose our ability to communicate properly only because developing technologies let us send emojis instead of words.

Now that we have Snapchat, Telegram and Instagram, why should we bother ourselves with what’s happening with a language?

Just look at modern teenagers who practically live on their phones, ignoring reality and spending all their time online.

I have two 12-year-old nieces who live in different countries and don’t know each other; nevertheless, both of them do the same thing at the same time, namely stick to the screens of their smartphones, watching videos, recording voice messages, making selfies, and doing whatever else they might think of.

It seems to me that if their parents just let them, these girls would spend all their time with their phones, and I hope that theis situation won’t ever get to this point one day.

That said, I still don’t think we should panic and take away phones from children and adults in order to defend proper grammar and spelling.

First of all, it’s cruel.

Secondly, it even sounds unrealistic; I won’t give you my phone, for example.

You only say "even" in an argument if it's very unlikely or you have evidence that would beat your opponent

So, what should be done?

What will help us to preserve correct grammar and spelling in the chaos and craziness of online chats, bots, and apps that are presumably destroying our languages right now?

Well, I think we have to put things in perspective ion this matter.

At the very heart of any educational system are universities and colleges which are meant to be temples of knowledge and wisdom.

It seems to me that professors and lecturers won't let education fall to its lowest level.

It's true that education is a worthwhile opportunity to enlighten one’s mind.

That being said, in order to get a degree, anyone has to go through various exams and assessments, among which are making calculations, writing essays, and so on.

To put it simply, the very concept of education implies willingness to solve tasks, obey restrictions and study rules whether it's laws of math or it's laws of grammar.

With thisese kind of restrictions and goals, we’ll lose proper grammar and spelling only when we lose our education.

There’s no shortage of people who are deeply interested in learning languages, and among their goals are usually correct writing and spelling.

If so many of us desire to be fluent in foreign languages, how can we lose them?

Indeed, that doesn’t mean that we always can produce foreign writing and speech correctly.

However, the desire to learn itself protects us from the danger of ignorance.

I still can’t pick up idioms, not because I don’t like them but because I don’t need them as much as grammar.

The third category of people who guarantee us that proper grammar and spelling won’t fade away down the road is writers and readers.

There will always be people who value literature, choosing novels over messengers and old-fashioned essays over apps.

Whether old literature, modern fiction, or even dictionaries, this layer of culture practically guarantees the preservation of proper grammar for us.

Using "for us" is redundant

However, by and large, they represent only a minimal cluster of writers.

In general, people write according to recognized standards of grammar and punctuation.

As a result, I don’t think we have to worry that grammar will disappear at some point, leaving us exposed to incomprehensible acronyms and emoji's sequences.

Even though today we're using short messages, we still have to write formal emails to our bosses, communicate with our children’s teachers and speak clearly with our friends.

You can say to your friend who’s chilling at your house, “LOL, have you seen this girl aka Ellen?

Omg, she’s hot AF, a fucking dope.”, But in general, I think it's unlikely that this kind of communication will become a commonplace in the future.

If someone is a "dope" then that means they're stupid.

Even though we have room for simplified language in our culture today, it doesn’t mean that this kind of language will absorb all the others.

Feedback

Great work!!

liya_allien's avatar
liya_allien

Feb. 10, 2023

0

People get used to sending emojis instead of complete sentences and recording voices instead of sending emails.

I think I have to change it to "voice messages"

liya_allien's avatar
liya_allien

Feb. 10, 2023

0

It seems to me that if their parents just let them, these girls would spend all their time with their phones, and I hope that theis situation won’t ever get to this point one day.

"their" is necessary?

liya_allien's avatar
liya_allien

Feb. 10, 2023

0

Omg, she’s hot AF, a fucking dope.”, But in general, I think it's unlikely that this kind of communication will become a commonplace in the future.

"dope" is often used as an adjective to describe something that is considered cool, excellent, or admirable. For example:

That new album is dope.

liya_allien's avatar
liya_allien

Feb. 10, 2023

0

thank you!

interestingthoughts's avatar
interestingthoughts

Feb. 10, 2023

0

"dope" is often used as an adjective to describe something that is considered cool, excellent, or admirable. For example: That new album is dope.

But if you're "A dope" then you're stupid. Since you used it as an adjective to describe the girl, then you said she's stupid. If it's for objects then what you said is correct, and if you get rid of the "A" and just say "She's dope" then it would also have the same meaning. Although calling someone "A dope" is more of an old-timey thing, if someone said that another person was "A dope" then that would mean their stupid.

interestingthoughts's avatar
interestingthoughts

Feb. 10, 2023

0

"their" is necessary?

I think in this place it would be. This is because if you just say that they would spend all their time with phones, then that wouldn't be specific enough and people could mistake you for saying that they spend all their time on any phone or just phones in general. I hope this helps!

liya_allien's avatar
liya_allien

Feb. 11, 2023

0

But if you're "A dope" then you're stupid. Since you used it as an adjective to describe the girl, then you said she's stupid. If it's for objects then what you said is correct, and if you get rid of the "A" and just say "She's dope" then it would also have the same meaning. Although calling someone "A dope" is more of an old-timey thing, if someone said that another person was "A dope" then that would mean their stupid.

okay, so I can use this word but without article "a"?

liya_allien's avatar
liya_allien

Feb. 11, 2023

0

I think in this place it would be. This is because if you just say that they would spend all their time with phones, then that wouldn't be specific enough and people could mistake you for saying that they spend all their time on any phone or just phones in general. I hope this helps!

thank you

interestingthoughts's avatar
interestingthoughts

Feb. 11, 2023

0

okay, so I can use this word but without article "a"?

Yes. Sorry for the confusion

The Death of Grammar

It’s said that today communication through instant messengers is surpassing other ways of communication.

People get used to sending emojis instead of complete sentences and recording voices instead of sending emails.

Some consider this situation truly dangerous and have an assumption that instant messaging may lead to the death of grammar and spelling rules at some point.

Even though those fears aren’t groundless in general, I can’t agree with this idea.

When you contrast against 'in general' you do so against a specific case.

I don’t think we’ll lose our ability to communicate properly only because developing technologies let us send emojis instead of words.

We certainly can do without proper grammar and spelling on the whole.

Now that we have Snapchat, Telegram and Instagram, why should we bother ourselves with what’s happening with a language?

Just look at modern teenagers who practically live on their phones, ignoring reality and spending all their time online.

I have two 12-year-old nieces who live in different countries and don’t know each other; nevertheless, both of them do the same thing at the same time, namely stick to the screens of their smartphones, watching videos, recording voice messages, mtaking selfies, and doing whatever else they might think of.

Selfies are photos, so we 'take' them (like we take a photograph).

It seems to me that if their parents just let them, these girls would spend all their time with phones, and I hope that the situation won’t get to this point one day.

That said, I still don’t think we should panic and take away phones from children and adults in order to defend proper grammar and spelling.

First of all, it’s cruel.

Secondly, it even sounds unrealistic; I won’t give youp my phone, for example.

The reader isn't the person you're suggesting would take away everyone's phones.

So, what should be done?

What will help us to preserve correct grammar and spelling in the chaos and craziness of online chats, bots, and apps that are presumably destroying our languages right now?

Well, I think we have to put things in perspective in this matter.

At the very heart of any educational system are universities and colleges which are meant to be temples of knowledge and wisdom.

It seems to me that professors and lecturers won't let education fall to its lowest level.

It's true that education is a worthwhile opportunity to enlighten one’s mind.

That being said, in order to get a degree, anyone has to go through various exams and assessments, among which are making calculations, writing essays, and so on.

To put it simply, the very concept of education implies willingness to solve tasks, obey restrictions and study rules whether it's laws of math or it's laws of grammar.

With this kind of restrictions and goals, we’ll lose proper grammar and spelling only when we lose our education.

A second large group of people who won’t let grammar and spelling die isare language learners.

Groups are plurals.

There’s no shortage of people who are deeply interested in learning languages, and among their goals are usually correct writing and spelling.

If so many of us desire to be fluent in foreign languages, how can we lose them?

Indeed, that doesn’t mean that we always can produce foreign writing and speech correctly.

However, the desire to learn itself protects us from the danger of ignorance.

Additionally, language learners begin with learning the basics, which means they pick up slang and acronyms much later, if they do this at all.

I still can’t pick up idioms, not because I don’t like them but because I don’t need them as much as grammar.

The third category of people who guarantee us that proper grammar and spelling won’t fade away down the road is writers and readers.

There will always be people who value literature, choosing novels over messengers and old-fashioned essays over apps.

Whether old literature, modern fiction, or even dictionaries, this layer of culture practically guarantees the preservation of proper grammar for us.

On the flip side, there are also writers who like to experiment with the language, writing without punctuation or compiling books from online chats.

However, by and large, they represent only a minimal clusterority of writers.

"minimal cluster" isn't exactly wrong, but it would be a very unusual way of saying this.

In general, people write according to recognized standards of grammar and punctuation.

As a result, I don’t think we have to worry that grammar will disappear at some point, leaving us exposed to incomprehensible acronyms and emoji's sequences.

Even though today we're using short messages, we still have to write formal emails to our bosses, communicate with our children’s teachers and speak clearly with our friends.

You can say to your friend who’s chilling at your house, “LOL, have you seen this girl aka Ellen?

Omg, she’s hot AF, a fucking dope.”, But in general, I think it's unlikely that this kind of communication will become a commonplace in the future.

Even though we have room for simplified language in our culture today, it doesn’t mean that this kind of language will absorb all the others.

Feedback

A well written, and well reasoned, argument there.

liya_allien's avatar
liya_allien

Feb. 10, 2023

0

Secondly, it even sounds unrealistic; I won’t give youp my phone, for example.

it's a joke

liya_allien's avatar
liya_allien

Feb. 10, 2023

0

A second large group of people who won’t let grammar and spelling die isare language learners.

I don't understand. "Group" should get a plural auxiliary verb?

liya_allien's avatar
liya_allien

Feb. 10, 2023

0

thank you so much for your help and feedback!

thomasmichaelwallace's avatar
thomasmichaelwallace

Feb. 10, 2023

3

I don't understand. "Group" should get a plural auxiliary verb?

I'm - er - not sure. "are" sounds right to me in this situation.
In this discussion ( https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/39838/is-group-singular-or-plural ), someone suggests it is because you use 'is' when you are referring to the group as an entity (because there is only one group), and "are" when you are referring to the members (because there are many members in a group).

liya_allien's avatar
liya_allien

Feb. 11, 2023

0

I'm - er - not sure. "are" sounds right to me in this situation. In this discussion ( https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/39838/is-group-singular-or-plural ), someone suggests it is because you use 'is' when you are referring to the group as an entity (because there is only one group), and "are" when you are referring to the members (because there are many members in a group).

Thank you

The Death of Grammar


This sentence has been marked as perfect!

This sentence has been marked as perfect!

It’s said that today communication through instant messengers is surpassing other ways of communication.


This sentence has been marked as perfect!

This sentence has been marked as perfect!

People get used to sending emojis instead of complete sentences and recording voices instead of sending emails.


This sentence has been marked as perfect!

People get used to sending emojis instead of complete sentences and recording voices instead of sending emails.

You could also say "recording their voices"

Some consider this situation truly dangerous and have an assumption that instant messaging may lead to the death of grammar and spelling rules at some point.


This sentence has been marked as perfect!

Some consider this situation truly dangerous and have anthe assumption that instant messaging may lead to the death of grammar and spelling rules at some point.

Even though those fears aren’t groundless in general, I can’t agree with this idea.


Even though those fears aren’t groundless in general, I can’t agree with this idea.

When you contrast against 'in general' you do so against a specific case.

This sentence has been marked as perfect!

I don’t think we’ll lose our ability to communicate properly only because developing technologies let us send emojis instead of words.


This sentence has been marked as perfect!

This sentence has been marked as perfect!

We certainly can do without proper grammar and spelling on the whole.


This sentence has been marked as perfect!

Now that we have Snapchat, Telegram and Instagram, why should we bother ourselves with what’s happening with a language?


This sentence has been marked as perfect!

This sentence has been marked as perfect!

Just look at modern teenagers who practically live on their phones, ignoring reality and spending all their time online.


This sentence has been marked as perfect!

This sentence has been marked as perfect!

I have two 12-year-old nieces who live in different countries and don’t know each other; nevertheless, both of them do the same thing at the same time, namely stick to the screens of their smartphones, watching videos, recording voice messages, making selfies, and doing whatever else they might think of.


I have two 12-year-old nieces who live in different countries and don’t know each other; nevertheless, both of them do the same thing at the same time, namely stick to the screens of their smartphones, watching videos, recording voice messages, mtaking selfies, and doing whatever else they might think of.

Selfies are photos, so we 'take' them (like we take a photograph).

This sentence has been marked as perfect!

It seems to me that if their parents just let them, these girls would spend all their time with phones, and I hope that the situation won’t get to this point one day.


It seems to me that if their parents just let them, these girls would spend all their time with phones, and I hope that the situation won’t get to this point one day.

It seems to me that if their parents just let them, these girls would spend all their time with their phones, and I hope that theis situation won’t ever get to this point one day.

That said, I still don’t think we should panic and take away phones from children and adults in order to defend proper grammar and spelling.


This sentence has been marked as perfect!

This sentence has been marked as perfect!

First of all, it’s cruel.


This sentence has been marked as perfect!

This sentence has been marked as perfect!

Secondly, it even sounds unrealistic; I won’t give you my phone, for example.


Secondly, it even sounds unrealistic; I won’t give youp my phone, for example.

The reader isn't the person you're suggesting would take away everyone's phones.

Secondly, it even sounds unrealistic; I won’t give you my phone, for example.

You only say "even" in an argument if it's very unlikely or you have evidence that would beat your opponent

So, what should be done?


This sentence has been marked as perfect!

This sentence has been marked as perfect!

What will help us to preserve correct grammar and spelling in the chaos and craziness of online chats, bots, and apps that are presumably destroying our languages right now?


This sentence has been marked as perfect!

This sentence has been marked as perfect!

Well, I think we have to put things in perspective in this matter.


This sentence has been marked as perfect!

Well, I think we have to put things in perspective ion this matter.

At the very heart of any educational system are universities and colleges which are meant to be temples of knowledge and wisdom.


This sentence has been marked as perfect!

This sentence has been marked as perfect!

It seems to me that professors and lecturers won't let education fall to its lowest level.


This sentence has been marked as perfect!

This sentence has been marked as perfect!

It's true that education is a worthwhile opportunity to enlighten one’s mind.


This sentence has been marked as perfect!

This sentence has been marked as perfect!

That being said, in order to get a degree, anyone has to go through various exams and assessments, among which are making calculations, writing essays, and so on.


This sentence has been marked as perfect!

This sentence has been marked as perfect!

To put it simply, the very concept of education implies willingness to solve tasks, obey restrictions and study rules whether it's laws of math or it's laws of grammar.


This sentence has been marked as perfect!

This sentence has been marked as perfect!

With this kind of restrictions and goals, we’ll lose proper grammar and spelling only when we lose our education.


This sentence has been marked as perfect!

With thisese kind of restrictions and goals, we’ll lose proper grammar and spelling only when we lose our education.

A second large group of people who won’t let grammar and spelling die is language learners.


A second large group of people who won’t let grammar and spelling die isare language learners.

Groups are plurals.

There’s no shortage of people who are deeply interested in learning languages, and among their goals are usually correct writing and spelling.


This sentence has been marked as perfect!

This sentence has been marked as perfect!

If so many of us desire to be fluent in foreign languages, how can we lose them?


This sentence has been marked as perfect!

This sentence has been marked as perfect!

Indeed, that doesn’t mean that we always can produce foreign writing and speech correctly.


This sentence has been marked as perfect!

This sentence has been marked as perfect!

However, the desire to learn itself protects us from the danger of ignorance.


This sentence has been marked as perfect!

This sentence has been marked as perfect!

Additionally, language learners begin with learning the basics, which means they pick up slang and acronyms much later, if they do this at all.


This sentence has been marked as perfect!

I still can’t pick up idioms, not because I don’t like them but because I don’t need them as much as grammar.


This sentence has been marked as perfect!

This sentence has been marked as perfect!

The third category of people who guarantee us that proper grammar and spelling won’t fade away down the road is writers and readers.


This sentence has been marked as perfect!

The third category of people who guarantee us that proper grammar and spelling won’t fade away down the road is writers and readers.

There will always be people who value literature, choosing novels over messengers and old-fashioned essays over apps.


This sentence has been marked as perfect!

This sentence has been marked as perfect!

Whether old literature, modern fiction, or even dictionaries, this layer of culture practically guarantees the preservation of proper grammar for us.


This sentence has been marked as perfect!

Whether old literature, modern fiction, or even dictionaries, this layer of culture practically guarantees the preservation of proper grammar for us.

Using "for us" is redundant

On the flip side, there are also writers who like to experiment with the language, writing without punctuation or compiling books from online chats.


This sentence has been marked as perfect!

However, by and large, they represent only a minimal cluster of writers.


However, by and large, they represent only a minimal clusterority of writers.

"minimal cluster" isn't exactly wrong, but it would be a very unusual way of saying this.

This sentence has been marked as perfect!

In general, people write and read according to recognized standards of grammar and punctuation.


As a result, I don’t think we have to worry that grammar will disappear at some point, leaving us exposed to incomprehensible acronyms and emoji's sequences.


As a result, I don’t think we have to worry that grammar will disappear at some point, leaving us exposed to incomprehensible acronyms and emoji's sequences.

This sentence has been marked as perfect!

Even though today we're using short messages, we still have to write formal emails to our bosses, communicate with our children’s teachers and speak clearly with our friends.


This sentence has been marked as perfect!

This sentence has been marked as perfect!

You can say to your friend who’s chilling at your house, “LOL, have you seen this girl aka Ellen?


This sentence has been marked as perfect!

This sentence has been marked as perfect!

Omg, she’s hot AF, a fucking dope.”, But in general, I think it's unlikely that this kind of communication will become a commonplace in the future.


This sentence has been marked as perfect!

Omg, she’s hot AF, a fucking dope.”, But in general, I think it's unlikely that this kind of communication will become a commonplace in the future.

If someone is a "dope" then that means they're stupid.

Even though we have room for simplified language in our culture today, it doesn’t mean that this kind of language will absorb all the others.


This sentence has been marked as perfect!

This sentence has been marked as perfect!

In general, people write according to recognized standards of grammar and punctuation.


This sentence has been marked as perfect!

This sentence has been marked as perfect!

You need LangCorrect Premium to access this feature.

Go Premium