Feb. 10, 2020
T 16 Part 4
■ For How Long Can EU Be on Top?
These advantages are not only limiting but also short-lived. For the European Union to be able to dominate the world of regulations is a fairly recent phenomenon, and its ground is shaking.
EU remains to be the largest market, but its share in the global economy is estimated to decline in the next decade. If the EU market shrinks, fewer and fewer companies would have the reason to follow its regulations. Technological innovations may weaken the EU’s power as well. Producing elaborate goods according to all kinds of regulations costs more as every time a new regulation comes into effect, companies are forced to change its production process. With the possibility of a wide spread of 3D printers, the cost of following both the EU and non-EU regulations would decline. In some areas, a highly strict standard may even backfire.
Some tech-advanced company in a fairly relaxed, non-regulatory country may conduct an experiment utilizing an advanced AI and ends up taking the lead in the industry. And Bradford warns that the phenomenon currently called the “Brussels Effect” may turn into the “Beijing Effect”. Such a shift may not be a near-future concern. Each country is being forced to choose between the superpowers they are willing to adhere to. EU has its perks over the unpredictable U.S. and the least democratic China. Historically, however, supremacy is not long-lasting. The strict EU regulations are no exceptions. No matter how strict the regulation is, it is always up to the company whether to follow it or not. Think about the British plug.
■ For How Long Can EU BeThe EU Stay on Top?
You may also want to drop "for." Headlines tend to be more direct.
These advantages are not only limitinged but also short-lived.
"Limiting" means "restrictive." Limited means "not infinite" or "few."
For tThe European Union to be able to dominate's domination over the world of regulations is a fairly recent phenomenon, and it's ground is shakingon shaky ground.
I understood what you meant by "its ground is shaking," but there are more natural ways to phrase it. You could also say, "its foundation is shaking"
The EU remains to be the largest market, but its share in the global economy is estimapredicted to decline in the next decade.
If the EU market shrinks, fewer and fewer companies would have the reason to follow its regulations.
Technological innovations may weaken the EU’s power as well.
Producing elaborate goods according to all kinds of regulations costs more as every time a new regulation comes into effect, companies are forced to change itstheir production process.
You could also say, "Producing goods in compliance with regulations..."
With the possibility of a3D printers becoming wide spread of 3D printers, the cost of following both the EU and non-EU regulations would declinrease.
In some areas, a highly strict standard may even backfire.
Some tech-advanced company in a fairly relaxed, non-regulatory country may conduct an experiment utilizing an advanced AI and ends up taking the lead in the industry.
And Bradford warns that the phenomenon currently called the “Brussels Effect” may turn into the “Beijing Effect”.
You could start this sentence with "Also," but I don't think it's needed.
Such a shift may not be a near-future concern.
This is fine, but I would say "Such a shift may not be a concern in the near future."
Each country is being forced to choose between the superpowers to which they are willing to adhere to.
S. and the leastss democratic China.
No matter how strict the regulation is, it is always up to the company whether tohey follow it or not.
Feedback
Regulation is often a controversial topic, isn't it? It's hard to stop domestic companies from simply moving if regulation becomes too restrictive.
Feb. 11, 2020
Yes, I agree. It's a double-edged sword...Thank you for your detailed corrections!
|
T 16 Part 4 |
|
■ For How Long Can EU Be on Top? ■ For How Long Can You may also want to drop "for." Headlines tend to be more direct. |
|
These advantages are not only limiting but also short-lived. These advantages are not only limit "Limiting" means "restrictive." Limited means "not infinite" or "few." |
|
For the European Union to be able to dominate the world of regulations is a fairly recent phenomenon, and its ground is shaking.
I understood what you meant by "its ground is shaking," but there are more natural ways to phrase it. You could also say, "its foundation is shaking" |
|
EU remains to be the largest market, but its share in the global economy is estimated to decline in the next decade. The EU remains |
|
If the EU market shrinks, fewer and fewer companies would have the reason to follow its regulations. This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
Technological innovations may weaken the EU’s power as well. This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
Producing elaborate goods according to all kinds of regulations costs more as every time a new regulation comes into effect, companies are forced to change its production process. Producing elaborate goods according to all kinds of regulations costs more as every time a new regulation comes into effect, companies are forced to change You could also say, "Producing goods in compliance with regulations..." |
|
With the possibility of a wide spread of 3D printers, the cost of following both the EU and non-EU regulations would decline. With the possibility of |
|
In some areas, a highly strict standard may even backfire. This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
Some tech-advanced company in a fairly relaxed, non-regulatory country may conduct an experiment utilizing an advanced AI and ends up taking the lead in the industry. Some tech-advanced company in a fairly relaxed, non-regulatory country may conduct an experiment utilizing an advanced AI and end |
|
And Bradford warns that the phenomenon currently called the “Brussels Effect” may turn into the “Beijing Effect”.
You could start this sentence with "Also," but I don't think it's needed. |
|
Such a shift may not be a near-future concern. Such a shift may not be a near-future concern. This is fine, but I would say "Such a shift may not be a concern in the near future." |
|
Each country is being forced to choose between the superpowers they are willing to adhere to. Each country is being forced to choose between the superpowers to which they are willing to adhere |
|
EU has its perks over the unpredictable U. |
|
S. and the least democratic China. S. and the le |
|
Historically, however, supremacy is not long-lasting. |
|
The strict EU regulations are no exceptions. |
|
No matter how strict the regulation is, it is always up to the company whether to follow it or not. No matter how strict the regulation is, it is always up to the company whether t |
|
Think about the British plug. |
You need LangCorrect Premium to access this feature.
Go Premium