According to liberalism, the new ‘unworking class’ is a useless class because they do not influence positive onhave a positive influence on the prosperity and glory of society.

The authors of the article about the future of employment explorstate that 47% of U.S. jobs will be replace thed by algorithms in the next 20 years.

the future tense is used as it is an event that has not happened yet.

They are , to name but a few, telemarketers, sport referees, paralegal assistants and so on.

The archaeologist is a safe professionArchaeologists will be insulated from these changes as their work involves a specific skill- pattern recognition. (I rephrased it, but if you want to keep the original structure you can write it like this: Archaeologists will be protected because of a specific skill that they possess- pattern recognition.

The future would give some jobs that require creativity and flexibility and some today workers are not able to be for example a virtual world designer.

не понятно

Another problem is unknown which skills have to acquire people because the half of today’s getting school abilities are not necessary anymore in the future.

не понятно

According to liberalism the new ‘unworking class’ is a useless class because they do not influence positivan increase oin prosperity and the glory of society.

The authors of the article the future of employment explore that 47% of U.S. jobs replace the algorithms in the next 20 yearwrite that to replace the algorithms in the next 20 years, future employment should examine 47% of U.S. jobs.

They are se include telemarketers, sport referees, paralegal assistants and so on.

The archaeologist profession is a safe profession because of a specific skill - pattern recognition.

The future would give somprovide jobs thatwhich require creativity and flexibility and some of today's workers are not able to be, for example, be a virtual world designer.

Another problem is that it's still unknown which skills have to acquire people because the half of today’s gettskills taught ing school abilities are not necessary any more in the future.

According to liberalism, the new ‘unworking class’ is a useless class, because they do not influence positive onpositively influence prosperity and the glory of society.

The authors of the article t"The future of employment explor" state that 47% of U.S. jobs will be replace thed by algorithms in the next 20 years.

They are se jobs include telemarketers, sport referees, paralegal assistants, and so on.

The aArchaeologisty is a safe profession because of its specific skill - -pattern recognitionset.

Pattern?

The future would giveallow for some jobs that require creativity and flexibility, and some of today's workers are notwould be able to be, for example, a virtual world designer.

I think this should be positive and not negative?

Another unknown problem is unknown which skills havepeople will need to acquire people because the half of today’s getting school abilities areschool skills may not necessary be needed anymore in the future.