March 3, 2021
SoundCloud’s Fan-powered Royalties
Just now I received a email from SoundCloud. It is a new feature called fan-powered royalties, a fairer way for artists to earn more money on SoundCloud. Traditionally, the profit of artists is based on dividing the cash pool, and dividing the total earnings by streaming. With fan-powered royalties, each listener's subscription or advertising revenue is distributed among the artists they actually listen to, rather than being pooled.
But I still have doubts about this method. Now there are three main problems with music streaming's profits: low royalties, the head effect, and algorithmic dependency. This feature mitigates the head effect, but doesn't address the low royalties to artists, and maybe bring many more problems.
First, royalties for artists are too low. In May 2020, it was reported that violinist Tamsin Little's work received between 5 and 6 million plays through the Spotify platform in six months, but only earned £12.34. Most of the artists' earnings come from touring and peripheral products such as T-shirts. So this approach may raise the artists' revenue, but by how much?
Second, streaming traffic is paramount. Like the band, BTS, has been criticized for spoiling the fairness by brushing up the traffic. Will this feature strengthen this unfairness?
Third, information cocoon. This feature is equivalent to indirectly encouraging fans to only listen to songs of their favorite artists and not to explore other people's songs. Limiting themselves to the music of only some artists leads to a single taste in music. Will it in turn bring more streaming traffic to the head artists?
Reference: https://community.soundcloud.com/fanpoweredroyalties
SoundCloud’s Fan-pPowered Royalties
Just now I received an email from SoundCloud.
It is a new feature called fan-powered royalties, a fairer way for artists to earn more money on SoundCloud.
Traditionally, the profit of artists is based on dividing the cash pool, and dividing the total earnings by streaming.
But I stillI have doubts about this method.
Now tThere are three main problems with music streaming's profits: low royalties, the head effect, and algorithmic dependency.
This feature mitigates the head effect, but doesn't address the low royalties to artists, and maybe bring many more problems.
Maybe is used more for a response to a question. It's a fine distinction. Here it is an alternative to the word "might".
In May 2020, it was reported that violinist Tamsin Little's work received between 5 and 6 million plays through the Spotify platform in six months, but only earned £12.34.
Most of the artists' earnings come from touring and peripheral products such as T-shirts.
So tThis approach may raise the artists' revenue, but by how much?
Second, streaming traffic is paramount.
LikeFor example, the band, BTS, has been criticized for spoiling the fairness by brushing up theinflating traffic.
Will this feature strengthenincrease this unfairness?
Third, information cocoon. is a possible result.
Not a complete sentence.
This feature is equivalent to indirectly encouraging fans to only listen to songs of their favorite artists and not to explore other people's songs.
Limiting themselves to the music of only some artists leads to a single taste in music.
Will it in turn bring more streaming traffic to the head artists?
Feedback
Overall this is very well written. Just a few things sounded odd or a little off to my native ear.
March 4, 2021
Thank you :)
SoundCloud’s Fan-pPowered Royalties
Just now, I received a email from SoundCloud.
It iswas for a new feature called "fan-powered royalties," a fairer way for artists to earn more money on SoundCloud.
Traditionally, the profit of artists isartists' profits are based on dividing the cash pool, and; they dividinge their total earnings by their amount of streamingers.
Not sure what you were trying to write here, although I'm not too familiar with Soundcloud :)
But I still have my doubts about this method.
NowCurrently, there are three main problems with profits from music streaming's profits: low royalties, the head effect, and algorithmic dependency.
This feature mitigates the head effect, but doesn't address the low royalties to artists, and maybe bring many more problems.
In May 2020, it was reported that violinist Tamsin Little's work received between 5 and 6 million plays through the Spotify platform in six months, but she only earned £12.34.
Most of the artists' earnings come from touring and pmeripheral productschandise such as T-shirts.
LikeFor instance, the band, BTS, has been criticized for spoiling the fairness by brushing upunfair ways that they have used to increase their traffic.
Will this feature strengthenincrease this unfairness?
Third, the information cocoon is another problem.
Limiting themselves to the music of only some artists leads to a singlemonotonous taste in music.
Will ithis in turn bring more streaming traffic to the head artists?
Feedback
Very well written! Just a few minor corrections.
March 4, 2021
Thank you :)
|
SoundCloud’s Fan-powered Royalties SoundCloud’s Fan- SoundCloud’s Fan- |
|
Just now I received a email from SoundCloud. Just now, I received a email from SoundCloud. Just now I received an email from SoundCloud. |
|
It is a new feature called fan-powered royalties, a fairer way for artists to earn more money on SoundCloud. It This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
Traditionally, the profit of artists is based on dividing the cash pool, and dividing the total earnings by streaming. Traditionally, Not sure what you were trying to write here, although I'm not too familiar with Soundcloud :) This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
With fan-powered royalties, each listener's subscription or advertising revenue is distributed among the artists they actually listen to, rather than being pooled. |
|
But I still have doubts about this method. But I still have my doubts about this method.
|
|
Now there are three main problems with music streaming's profits: low royalties, the head effect, and algorithmic dependency.
|
|
This feature mitigates the head effect, but doesn't address the low royalties to artists, and maybe bring many more problems. This feature mitigates the head effect, but doesn't address the low royalties to artists This feature mitigates the head effect, but doesn't address the low royalties to artists, and may Maybe is used more for a response to a question. It's a fine distinction. Here it is an alternative to the word "might". |
|
First, royalties for artists are too low. |
|
In May 2020, it was reported that violinist Tamsin Little's work received between 5 and 6 million plays through the Spotify platform in six months, but only earned £12.34. In May 2020, it was reported that violinist Tamsin Little's work received between 5 and 6 million plays through the Spotify platform in six months, but she only earned £12.34. This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
Most of the artists' earnings come from touring and peripheral products such as T-shirts. Most of the artists' earnings come from touring and This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
So this approach may raise the artists' revenue, but by how much?
|
|
Second, streaming traffic is paramount. This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
Like the band, BTS, has been criticized for spoiling the fairness by brushing up the traffic.
|
|
Will this feature strengthen this unfairness? Will this feature Will this feature |
|
Third, information cocoon. Third, the information cocoon is another problem. Third, information cocoon Not a complete sentence. |
|
This feature is equivalent to indirectly encouraging fans to only listen to songs of their favorite artists and not to explore other people's songs. This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
Limiting themselves to the music of only some artists leads to a single taste in music. Limiting themselves to the music of only some artists leads to a This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
Will it in turn bring more streaming traffic to the head artists? Will This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
You need LangCorrect Premium to access this feature.
Go Premium