July 18, 2023
should the government regulate people's unhealthy lifestyle
Living a healthy lifestyle is essential for the public because it improves the quality of life and extends life expectancy of all generations. Some people advocate that the government should take some measures to guarantee a healthy lifestyle for its citizens, while others believe there should not be too many restrictions.
The government interventions, to view in a positive light, are able to regulate inappropriate behavior. Many individuals lack self-discipline. Although they know these behaviors have been proven to be harmful to health, they can not reject the joy provided.
Therefore, some governments impose some measures with the aim to guide the public. For example, levying heavy taxes on tobacco and prohibiting smoking in public areas are feasible methods for curbing cigarette consumption. At the same time, food manufacturers follow regulations to state nutrient information on product packaging, which increasing consumers’ awareness of what the food contains. To guide people to change their sedentary lifestyle, some governments have increased the petrol tax or introduced a rush hour toll to encourage walking or cycling as modes of commuting.
On the other hand, government intervention also has its negative effects. People believe that they can lead a better life if they can make decisions with more freedom. People who live in a society with tight regulations would feel stifled and always be alarming to every single step. Meanwhile, many argue that the main goal of the government is to find excuses for increasing tax revenue since many regulations are implemented through levying certain taxes.
However, in my opinion, those measures taken by the government are still worthwhile, at least they will have a long-lasting impact. People who lead a healthy lifestyle will reduce doctor visits, which alleviate the burden on the medical system and decreases the portion of medical insurance in social welfare.
should the government regulate people's unhealthy lifestyle
Living a healthy lifestyle is essential for the public because it improves the quality of life and extends life expectancy of all generations.
Some people advocate that the government should take some measures to guarantee a healthy lifestyle for its citizens, while others believe there should not be too many restrictions.
The government interventions, to view them in a positive light, are able to regulate inappropriate behavior.
Many individuals lack self-discipline.
Although they know these behaviors have been proven to be harmful to health, they can not rejecsist the joy providedtemptation.
"Reject the joy" sounds a little weird
Therefore, some governments impose some measures with the aim to guide the public.
For example, levying heavy taxes on tobacco and prohibiting smoking in public areas are feasible methods for curbing cigarette consumption.
At the same time, food manufacturers follow regulations to state nutrient information on product packaging, which increasinges consumers’ awareness of what the food contains.
To guide people to change their sedentary lifestyle, some governments have increased the petrol tax or introduced a rush hour toll to encourage walking or cycling as modes of commuting.
People believe that they can lead a better life if they can make decisions with more freedom.
People who live in a society with tight regulations would feel stifled and always be alarming to every single stepon guard with every step they make.
Not quite sure what you meant to say with "alarming to every single step" but I took it to mean to be on the look-out, to double check attentively their surroundings to avoid making a mistake.
Meanwhile, many argue that the main goal of the government is to find excuses for increasing tax revenue since many regulations are implemented through levying certain taxes.
However, in my opinion, those measures taken by the government are still worthwhile, at least they will have a long-lasting impact.
People who lead a healthy lifestyle will reduce doctor visits, which alleviate the burden on the medical system and decreases the portion of medical insurance in social welfare.
July 18, 2023
People who live in a society with tight regulations would feel stifled and always be alarming to every single stepon guard with every step they make.
I just wanna say become "sensitive"or"cautious"
|
Although they know these behaviors have been proven to be harmful to health, they can not reject the joy provided. Although they know these behaviors have been proven to be harmful to health, they can not re "Reject the joy" sounds a little weird |
|
should the government regulate people's unhealthy lifestyle This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
Living a healthy lifestyle is essential for the public because it improves the quality of life and extends life expectancy of all generations. This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
Some people advocate that the government should take some measures to guarantee a healthy lifestyle for its citizens, while others believe there should not be too many restrictions. This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
The government interventions, to view in a positive light, are able to regulate inappropriate behavior. The government interventions, to view them in a positive light, are able to regulate inappropriate behavior. |
|
Many individuals lack self-discipline. This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
Therefore, some governments impose some measures with the aim to guide the public. This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
For example, levying heavy taxes on tobacco and prohibiting smoking in public areas are feasible methods for curbing cigarette consumption. This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
At the same time, food manufacturers follow regulations to state nutrient information on product packaging, which increasing consumers’ awareness of what the food contains. At the same time, food manufacturers follow regulations to state nutrient information on product packaging, which increas |
|
To guide people to change their sedentary lifestyle, some governments have increased the petrol tax or introduced a rush hour toll to encourage walking or cycling as modes of commuting. This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
On the other hand, government intervention also has its negative effects. |
|
People believe that they can lead a better life if they can make decisions with more freedom. This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
People who live in a society with tight regulations would feel stifled and always be alarming to every single step. People who live in a society with tight regulations would feel stifled and always be Not quite sure what you meant to say with "alarming to every single step" but I took it to mean to be on the look-out, to double check attentively their surroundings to avoid making a mistake. |
|
Meanwhile, many argue that the main goal of the government is to find excuses for increasing tax revenue since many regulations are implemented through levying certain taxes. This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
However, in my opinion, those measures taken by the government are still worthwhile, at least they will have a long-lasting impact. This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
People who lead a healthy lifestyle will reduce doctor visits, which alleviate the burden on the medical system and decreases the portion of medical insurance in social welfare. This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
You need LangCorrect Premium to access this feature.
Go Premium