mossphlox's avatar
mossphlox

Dec. 11, 2020

0
Should political parties be financed from the state budget?

Firstly, we should explain what is a political party. It is well known that it is a voluntary social organization with a specific political program, aimed at its implementation by gaining and exercising power or influencing it. On the other hand the topic of politics is controversial because many of the conversations lead to arguments at the table and each of us has individual political opinions. My assignment is to answer if political parties should be financed from the state budget.
I think that political parties should be financed by the state but with a fraction of the money.
One of the reasons is the state should support the parties because they pay for their work.
The second, public figures have huge earnings, so they should be reduce.
Critics often say that most of citizens money is donated to political parties and unnecessary party goals, even though many citizens have low earnings. Moreover, political parties receive various kinds of donations from supporters or subs.
In conclusion, political parties should only be financed from a little part of the state budget, so that the remaining money can be used for worthwhile purposes.

*It's my English homework. I don't interested in politics :')

Corrections

Should political parties be financed from the state budget?

Firstly, we should explain what is a political party is.

It is well known that it is a voluntary social organization with a specific political programagenda, aimed at its implementation by gaining and exercising power or influencing it.

I don't follow your meaning in the second part of this sentence.

On the other hand, the topic of politics iscan be controversial because many of thepolitical conversations lead to arguments at the table, and each of us haswe all have our own individual political opinions.

My assignment is to answer ifelaborate on whether or not political parties should be financed from the state budget.

I think that political parties should be part financed by the state but with a fraction of the money.

One of the reasons isbeing, the state should support the parties because they pay for their work.

Grammatically fine but I don't understand the point. It seems to be saying the same thing twice.

The sSecondly, public figures havmake huge earnings, so they should be reduced.

Moreover, political parties receive various kinds of donations from supporters or subs.

subs?

In conclusion, political parties should only be part-financed from a little part ofby the state budget, so that the remainingbulk of the money can be used for more worthwhile purposes.

I don''m not interested in politics :')

mossphlox's avatar
mossphlox

Dec. 13, 2020

0

Thank you very much!

Should political parties be financed from the state budget?


This sentence has been marked as perfect!

Firstly, we should explain what is a political party.


Firstly, we should explain what is a political party is.

It is well known that it is a voluntary social organization with a specific political program, aimed at its implementation by gaining and exercising power or influencing it.


It is well known that it is a voluntary social organization with a specific political programagenda, aimed at its implementation by gaining and exercising power or influencing it.

I don't follow your meaning in the second part of this sentence.

On the other hand the topic of politics is controversial because many of the conversations lead to arguments at the table and each of us has individual political opinions.


On the other hand, the topic of politics iscan be controversial because many of thepolitical conversations lead to arguments at the table, and each of us haswe all have our own individual political opinions.

My assignment is to answer if political parties should be financed from the state budget.


My assignment is to answer ifelaborate on whether or not political parties should be financed from the state budget.

I think that political parties should be financed by the state but with a fraction of the money.


I think that political parties should be part financed by the state but with a fraction of the money.

One of the reasons is the state should support the parties because they pay for their work.


One of the reasons isbeing, the state should support the parties because they pay for their work.

Grammatically fine but I don't understand the point. It seems to be saying the same thing twice.

The second, public figures have huge earnings, so they should be reduce.


The sSecondly, public figures havmake huge earnings, so they should be reduced.

Critics often say that most of citizens money is donated to political parties and unnecessary party goals, even though many citizens have low earnings.


Moreover, political parties receive various kinds of donations from supporters or subs.


Moreover, political parties receive various kinds of donations from supporters or subs.

subs?

In conclusion, political parties should only be financed from a little part of the state budget, so that the remaining money can be used for worthwhile purposes.


In conclusion, political parties should only be part-financed from a little part ofby the state budget, so that the remainingbulk of the money can be used for more worthwhile purposes.

*It's my English homework.


I don't interested in politics :')


I don''m not interested in politics :')

You need LangCorrect Premium to access this feature.

Go Premium