Nowadays,At the moment there is an argument debate about the school education in thes in society.

"School education" feels a bit unncessary, because "the education system" often referrs to the schooling of children. Perhaps you want to clarify with "High school"?

It has raises ad questions of how should the education system work to improve a learning processes.

There are variety of pointsuggestions of how the education system should handle this problem.

One of the main points issuggestions has been a synergy of knowledge.

I keep using the past tense - "has been" instead of "is", because the debate is something that started in the past and is ongoing. In this context, this tense feels the best to use.

Children that have different minds willperspectives on things should collaborate helping to improve their own critical thinking, as well as to look at problems from different perspectives.

The Another is a tolerance in society.

As a result, it will let them handle social issues effectively in future allowing them to build a better society.

The opposite side is a bad influence between studentHowever, this could also lead to students having bad influences.

Sometimes, children who raised in bad social environment could bring bad habits ato school.

Therefore, this willould affect the atmosphere in classrooms.

We use the conditional "would" instead of "will" because we are talking about what could/would happen IF this policy was put in place.

For this reason,This could makinge teachers spend their time dealing with conflicts that will, disrupting the learning process.

The last is a growing fornurturing talented kids.

Often the word "nurturing" is used in context of supporting children's education. The word "nurturing" means to closely look after, and is often assosiated with plants ("nurturing a flower") or children ("nurturing a child's growth")

WHaving a wide range of abilities implies that there arwill be children who might be more talented.

However, tThey could be forced to learn knowledge that is already obsolete for them.

This could make them stuck instunt their development, as a result of not letting them make the best out of their abilities.

instead of "make them stuck" (which works, but sounds quite plain), more colloquially is "stunt". Similar to "nuture", it is often applied to plants and children - to "stunt" growth is to prevent, block, or starve growth in some way.

To sum up, the education system sometimes can’t keep up with the speed of changes in the society.

Therefore, we should provide as moreany possibilities as we can for all children to grow and develop their abilities.

Nowadays, there is an argument debate about the school education in the society.