mr_h's avatar
mr_h

Dec. 29, 2020

0
Yeah

Yes I will, the only reason I eat food is because the craving I get. Not because I choose to eat food conscientiously

Corrections (1)
Correction Settings
Choose how corrections are organized

Only show inserted text
Word-level diffs are planned for a future update.

mr_h's avatar
mr_h

Jan. 1, 2021

0

Yeah


Yeah Yeah

As a sub-heading in a larger article, it might be fine, but as a title this is rather odd.

Yes I will, the only reason I eat food is because the craving I get.


Yes, I will,ould: the only reason I eat food is because the cravings I get. Yes, I would: the only reason I eat food is because the cravings I get.

The scenario in the question is completely hypothetical, so the conditional tense should be used instead of the future tense.

Not because I choose to eat food conscientiously


Not because I choose to eat food conscientiously. Not because I choose to eat food consciously.

This should be merged with the previous sentence: by itself and unaccompanied by any question that it might respond to, it sounds like a sentence fragment. "Conscientiously" refers to meticulousness (often with a moral connotation), so it doesn't make sense here. "Consciously" is better.

You need LangCorrect Premium to access this feature.

Go Premium