July 16, 2025
Run
I was running, it's been a long time, about 3 months to the previous run I've had.
Because I hadn't use my shoes much, for instance, I was putting on my shoes since 1 year (after 1 year of no running) - it happened 2 years ago.
The run that I mentioned first, after 3 months, the sole is bad, no more function for running.
The result, my feet felt hurt for only 10 minutes, I tried to run for more 5 min.
Then I had a rest day because of my feet.
The takeaway I got from that, is to make more money, cuz I'm broke...
I was running, iused to run. It's been a long time, about 3 months to thesince my previous run I've had.
you could also use a semicolon instead of the period (...to run; it's been a long time...)
Because I hadn't used my shoes much, for instance, I was putting on my shoes since 1 year (after 1 year of no running) - it happened 2 years ago. during the year before my previous run, there was something wrong with them.
I don't think I understand exactly what you are saying here, but above is one suggestion that I think captures your intended meaning
Still, I don't understand why not using shoes makes them have a problem. But I am probably misunderstanding your point.
The ruOn that I mentioned first, after 3run three months ago, the sole iswent bad, and the shoes had no more function for running.
this sounds a bit more natural
The result, was that my feet felt hurt foafter only 10 minutes, but I tried to run for 5 more 5 min.utes.
Either:
"As a result, my ..."
OR
"The result was ..."
"hurt for only 10 minutes" would mean that they stopped hurting after 10 minutes, but I think you mean that they began to hurt 10 minutes into your run
Then I had a rest day because of my feet. hurt.
"because of my feet" is okay, but adding a bit more detail makes it seem more natural, in my opinion
another idea could be
Then I had a rest day so my feet could feel better.
The takeaway I got from that, is to make more money, cuz I'm broke...
you will mostly see "because" instead of "cuz"
the first comma was unnecessary because "is to make more money" is a dependent clause
Feedback
Nice job expressing yourself. It is funny, because I was just thinking about running before I saw this post! Some of the issues concerned sentence structures and grammar stuff. Overall, I could understand your main points.
July 17, 2025
"Still, I don't understand why not using shoes makes them have a problem. But I am probably misunderstanding your point."
because after not using a shoes, the sole will becomes hard, brittle, or loses cushioning.
July 17, 2025
Also I'm getting done with my grammar, since I focus on learning new words for now for easier to express myself.
I don't know how you can get the idea of what I was trying to say xD
Seems like it's been very difficult for ya
July 17, 2025
Oh, that's kind of what I was thinking, that the shoe materials get old and start to decay. Congrats on the long writing streak!
I was running, i. It's been a long time, about 3 months to the, since my previous run I've had.
Because I hadn't use my shoes much, for instance, I was putting on my shoes since 1 year (after 1 year of no running) - it happened 2 years ago.
I don't understand this sentence, sorry.
The run that I mentioned first, after 3 months, the sole is bad, no more function for running.
I don't understand this sentence either.
TheAs a result, my feet felt hurt foafter only 10 minutes, but I tried to run for more 5 min.
|
Run |
|
I was running, it's been a long time, about 3 months to the previous run I've had. I was running I you could also use a semicolon instead of the period (...to run; it's been a long time...) |
|
Because I hadn't use my shoes much, for instance, I was putting on my shoes since 1 year (after 1 year of no running) - it happened 2 years ago. Because I hadn't use my shoes much, for instance, I was putting on my shoes since 1 year (after 1 year of no running) - it happened 2 years ago. I don't understand this sentence, sorry. Because I hadn't used my shoes much I don't think I understand exactly what you are saying here, but above is one suggestion that I think captures your intended meaning Still, I don't understand why not using shoes makes them have a problem. But I am probably misunderstanding your point. |
|
The run that I mentioned first, after 3 months, the sole is bad, no more function for running. The run that I mentioned first, after 3 months, the sole is bad, no more function for running. I don't understand this sentence either.
this sounds a bit more natural |
|
The result, my feet felt hurt for only 10 minutes, I tried to run for more 5 min.
The result Either: "As a result, my ..." OR "The result was ..." "hurt for only 10 minutes" would mean that they stopped hurting after 10 minutes, but I think you mean that they began to hurt 10 minutes into your run |
|
Then I had a rest day because of my feet. Then I had a rest day because "because of my feet" is okay, but adding a bit more detail makes it seem more natural, in my opinion another idea could be Then I had a rest day so my feet could feel better. |
|
The takeaway I got from that, is to make more money, cuz I'm broke... The takeaway I got from that you will mostly see "because" instead of "cuz" the first comma was unnecessary because "is to make more money" is a dependent clause |
You need LangCorrect Premium to access this feature.
Go Premium