Jan. 23, 2021
Criticizing Others’ Writing.
These are fragments from my recent writing. It criticizes others’ writing.
***
I still think that their work has the significance for the advancement of the study field. However, I don't think a few major comments are sufficiently answered in the revised manuscript. So I write them in detail on my reviewer’s comment.
…
In the light of the fuller description of the criteria, I think the description is far from satisfactory. Moreover, the criteria already contains two of the study parameters, that can be problematic considering the study hypothesis. One cannot argue something as a new discriminatory finding when it is already in an established criteria. And if they already used that feature to allocate a case to be either the specified condition or not, they cannot argue that feature is the finding from their analysis.
…
The lack of clarity in describing the criteria actually made me confused for a while when I was reading the manuscript for the first time.
…
I am not sure whether the author's abbreviation, phf, could take lower-cases. Please do language correction and editing for the table and figure legends, too. For example, "means with standard deviations in parentheses are presented in all variables, except in sex" in Table 1 seems weird.
Correction Settings
Criticizing Others’ Writing.
These are fragments from my recent writing.
It criticizes others’ writing.
***
I still think that their work has the significance ofor the advancement of the study field.
I still think that their work has the significance of the advancement of the study field.
has the significance *** of*** . unfortunately you need to remember phrasals, good work though
However, I don't think a few major comments are not sufficiently answered in the revised manuscript.
However, I think a few major comments are not sufficiently answered in the revised manuscript.
The negation (not) comes after the verb we want to negate.
So I write them in detail on my reviewer’s comment.
…
In the light of the fullermore complete description of the criteria, I think the description is far from satisfactory.
In the light of the more complete description of the criteria, I think the description is far from satisfactory.
The most correct way to write this is: Since the criteria are more accurately described now, ...
Plus, fuller doesn't exist (something is full or not)
Moreover, the criteria already contains two of the study parameters, that can be problematic considering the study hypothesis.
One cannot argue something as a new discriminatory finding when it is already in an established criteria.
And if they already used that feature to allocate a case to be either the specified condition or not, they cannot argue that feature is the finding from their analysis.
…
The lack of clarity in describing the criteria actually made me confused for a while when I was reading the manuscript for the first time.
…
I am not sure whether the author's abbreviation, phf, could takebe written in lower-cases.
I am not sure whether the author's abbreviation, phf, could be written in lower-case.
You mean that you wanted to be written like this "PHF"? I am not sure.
Please do language correction and editing for the table and ,figure legends, too.
Please do language correction and edit the table,figure legends too.
1)You already used simple present , so the present continuous doesn't match here.
2) edit something (not edit for)
3) 2 "and" in one sentence is not right stylistically. If you are not sure, just put a comma ","
For example, "means with standard deviations in parentheses are presented in all variables, except in sex" in Table 1 seems weird.
Feedback
Very good job. Don't try to traslate word by word from your own language and keep practising!!
Jan. 24, 2021
I am not sure whether the author's abbreviation, phf, could takebe written in lower-cases.
You mean that you wanted to be written like this "PHF"? I am not sure.
Yes, I do. I haven't seen any arbitrary abbreviation all written in lower-case. What do you think about this?
Jan. 24, 2021
Please do language correction and editing for the table and ,figure legends, too.
1)You already used simple present , so the present continuous doesn't match here.
2) edit something (not edit for)
3) 2 "and" in one sentence is not right stylistically. If you are not sure, just put a comma ","
Do you mean that "Please do language correction and editing for the table, figure legends too" is correct? The mark-up style of langcorrect.com is quite confusing this time.
Jan. 24, 2021
Thank you for giving me those invaluable tips! I know that literal translation from my mother tongue often does not make sense. So I am trying to get the feel of the target language, or so-called "language awareness", by exposing myself to lots of stuff.
|
It criticizes others’ writing. This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
*** This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
I still think that their work has the significance for the advancement of the study field.
I still think that their work has the significance of has the significance *** of*** . unfortunately you need to remember phrasals, good work though |
|
However, I don't think a few major comments are sufficiently answered in the revised manuscript.
However, I The negation (not) comes after the verb we want to negate. |
|
So I write them in detail on my reviewer’s comment. This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
… This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
In the light of the fuller description of the criteria, I think the description is far from satisfactory.
In the light of the The most correct way to write this is: Since the criteria are more accurately described now, ... Plus, fuller doesn't exist (something is full or not) |
|
Moreover, the criteria already contains two of the study parameters, that can be problematic considering the study hypothesis. This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
One cannot argue something as a new discriminatory finding when it is already in an established criteria. This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
Criticizing Others’ Writing. This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
These are fragments from my recent writing. This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
And if they already used that feature to allocate a case to be either the specified condition or not, they cannot argue that feature is the finding from their analysis. This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
… This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
The lack of clarity in describing the criteria actually made me confused for a while when I was reading the manuscript for the first time. This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
… This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
I am not sure whether the author's abbreviation, phf, could take lower-cases.
I am not sure whether the author's abbreviation, phf, could You mean that you wanted to be written like this "PHF"? I am not sure. |
|
Please do language correction and editing for the table and figure legends, too.
Please do language correction and edit 1)You already used simple present , so the present continuous doesn't match here. 2) edit something (not edit for) 3) 2 "and" in one sentence is not right stylistically. If you are not sure, just put a comma "," |
|
For example, "means with standard deviations in parentheses are presented in all variables, except in sex" in Table 1 seems weird. This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
You need LangCorrect Premium to access this feature.
Go Premium