On the topic about ways to reward employees for good workIt is not only salary increase iss that are a perfect way to reward the employees’ works, but also to give o. Other kinds of rewards, as outdoor activities during holidays or weekends, may also be considered a good stimulationincentives to employees in order to improve their performance.

To begin with, an important reward that I mentioned in the introduction, the economical part is so incentives are important in the employees’ lifeves and motivate them to do good work infor their companies.

"Economical": using money judiciously
"Economic": related to money, finances, incentives etc.

For this point, to earning extra money or to receiveing an extra payment is aare very good ways to encouraginge employees.

For example, in the sales area, the seller can receive extra money for each important sellale in the market.

Secondly, outdoor activities are an excellent way to give them a relaxeding moment forto resting from the work’s pressure of their work.

For example, during holidays or weekends, the company’s boss may organize some small events, picnics, or a lunch meal in order to. The boss and all the employees and boss gather infor these activities, then they may share together and also give to employees the opportunity to participate in recreational activities during these periods of free time.

“In order to” introduces a verbal phrase and never a clause.

“They may share together” doesn’t make sense. Do you mean that they can share an experience, or something else? Who is “they”?

“Recreational activities” is not something that can be given.

The sentence is wordy (and I’m speaking as someone who tends to write long sentences!) so I broke it up.

Finally, the indoor space of the company is very important to analyze when the boss triesconsider when trying to encourage to employees for doingto do good work.

“Important to analyze” is grammatical but not as common, in my experience, at the end of clauses like this one.

“The boss tries” is fine, but since you’re writing about a more general situation, this sounds better to me.

For example, themaintaining a comfortable temperature is an important key toelement in giveing them a comfortable space for doing their works respectivelyworking environment.

“Respectively” should be used when there is some notion of assigning items in separate groups to each other. I don’t see such an element here.

“For doing their work” is fine but sounds heavy. “Workspace” or “working environment” would be better:

Furthermore, some decorations in the workplace may count as a good stimulation to employees or having the opportunity of drinking water or coffee in the work time.

The structure here is confusing. The paralleled element is “may count as,” so in the second half you have “may count as having the opportunity,” which does not make sense. “Decorations” do not include the water cooler or coffee machine.

In conclusion, bosses always try to findidentify important considerations in order to reward employees for doing good work and to encourage them to continue doing this one.

“Considerations” suggests that there is an issue or question being considered, but that seems absent from the second half.

ReceivingIt is not only extra money not onlythat improves the capacity of the employee’s efficiency, but also g. Giving to employees some recreational activities during holidays or weekends, may also contribute to improvements to thein employees’ performance, and consequently, they receive some good rewards.

The “but”/“not only” contrast suggests that it’s about the same subject, but you changed the topic after “but.” Rephrasing is necessary.

“Consequently, they receive some good rewards” doesn’t make sense to me. I assume that “they” is the employees, and if so, it is already a given that they may be rewarded.