Jan. 17, 2020
Regulation of coal ash
The content of the reading and listening is totally contradictory in the new regulations of protecting the environment from burning coal in power plants that produce coal ash. Firstly, the reading mentions that environmental regulations already exist. Companies are required to use liner for preventing coal ash leaking into the ponds or landfills. However, the listening maintains that the regulations are not sufficient at all, because the liner has to be used only when companies build new landfills or pounds. Companies are not required to use in odd one. So, it causes significant damage that chemical materials leak into drinking water.
Secondly, the reading suggests that coal ash has been recycled, which is used in building materials like concrete and brinks, but customers concern that the materials are too dangerous. So they stop buying the products. Yet, the listening asserts that the regulations are not likely stopping customers from buying the products. Take mercury, for example, it is harmful material, but it is successfully and safely recycled for a long time. There are a few concerns from customers.
Lastly, the reading implies that strict new regulations would be raising electricity costs. Likewise, the speaker disputes it and stresses that although the cost increases, the benefit from coal ash is worthwhile than the extra cost. In addition, the cost increases the customers' electricity bill only one percent.
Regulation of cCoal aAsh
The content of the reading and listening is totallyn <the article> is contradictory into the new regulations of protecting the environment from burning coal in power plants that produce coal ash.
"totally" is too casual to use in an essay.
<the news story> and <new regulations> are being compared. You need to define what the new regulations are being compared to. I just assumed it was a new story because you included listening (and not just reading) but please fill it in yourself.
Firstly, the reading mentions that environmental regulations already exist.
Companies are required to use liner forto preventing coal ash to leaking into the ponds or landfills.
"The ponds and landfills" use "the" if both the reader and speaker know what the specific pond and landfill is. I don't, so I took out "the".
However, the listening maintainconfirms that the regulations are not sufficient at all, because the liner has to be used only when companies build new landfills or pounds.
My Canadian English can't relate landfill and pound together but I'm going to leave it alone. I assume it is related to "dog pound" as in a reference to an area.
Companies are not required to use in odd onet.
I'm sorry, I have no idea what an "in odd one" means.
So, it causes significant damage thatwhere chemical materials leak into drinking water.
Secondly, the reading suggests that coal ash has been recycled, which is used in building materials like concrete and brinks, but customers have concerns that the materials are too dangerous.
So they stop buying the products which contain coal ash.
Again, no specific item to be able to use "the". Instead, use a generic filter.
Yet, the listening asserts that the regulations are not likely to stopping customers from buying the products.
Take mercury, for an example, i. It is a harmful material, but it ishas been successfully and safely recycled for a long timemany years.
A long time might mean "length to recycle" I so chose "length of history".
There are a few concerns from customers.
Lastly, the reading implies that strict new regulations would be raising electricity costs.
Likewise, the speaker disputes it and stresses that although the cost increases, the benefit from coal ash is more worthwhile than the extra cost.
In addition, the cost increases the customers' electricity bill by only one percent.
|
Regulation of coal ash Regulation of |
|
The content of the reading and listening is totally contradictory in the new regulations of protecting the environment from burning coal in power plants that produce coal ash. The content of the reading and listening i "totally" is too casual to use in an essay. <the news story> and <new regulations> are being compared. You need to define what the new regulations are being compared to. I just assumed it was a new story because you included listening (and not just reading) but please fill it in yourself. |
|
Firstly, the reading mentions that environmental regulations already exist. This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
Companies are required to use liner for preventing coal ash leaking into the ponds or landfills. Companies are required to use liner "The ponds and landfills" use "the" if both the reader and speaker know what the specific pond and landfill is. I don't, so I took out "the". |
|
However, the listening maintains that the regulations are not sufficient at all, because the liner has to be used only when companies build new landfills or pounds. However, the listening My Canadian English can't relate landfill and pound together but I'm going to leave it alone. I assume it is related to "dog pound" as in a reference to an area. |
|
Companies are not required to use in odd one. Companies are not required to use i I'm sorry, I have no idea what an "in odd one" means. |
|
So, it causes significant damage that chemical materials leak into drinking water. So, it causes significant damage |
|
Secondly, the reading suggests that coal ash has been recycled, which is used in building materials like concrete and brinks, but customers concern that the materials are too dangerous. Secondly, the reading suggests that coal ash has been recycled, which is used in building materials like concrete and brinks, but customers have concerns that the materials are too dangerous. |
|
So they stop buying the products. So they stop buying Again, no specific item to be able to use "the". Instead, use a generic filter. |
|
Yet, the listening asserts that the regulations are not likely stopping customers from buying the products. Yet, the listening asserts that the regulations are not likely to stop |
|
Take mercury, for example, it is harmful material, but it is successfully and safely recycled for a long time. Take mercury A long time might mean "length to recycle" I so chose "length of history". |
|
There are a few concerns from customers. This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
Lastly, the reading implies that strict new regulations would be raising electricity costs. This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
Likewise, the speaker disputes it and stresses that although the cost increases, the benefit from coal ash is worthwhile than the extra cost. Likewise, the speaker disputes it and stresses that although the cost increases, the benefit from coal ash is more worthwhile than the extra cost. |
|
In addition, the cost increases the customers' electricity bill only one percent. In addition, the cost increases the customers' electricity bill by only one percent. |
You need LangCorrect Premium to access this feature.
Go Premium