Redundancy Mayight Help Reduce International Miscommunications

提案:同じ文章に「私」という言葉を複数回使うことは避けましょう。特に文章を書く場合は。（話す場合は大丈夫です。 ただし、英語の話し方は英語の書き方とは異なります） I'm Japanese, and I'am learning English.

In order to imprive my English, I adopt to write somethdo that, I have been writing on LangCorrect, and I canhope to learn from the corrections done by nativefluent English speakers.

NOTE: Some non-native English speakers are fully fluent. The question should be fluency, not country of origin.

As I said before that my English is far from perfect, what I'm writing here also contains a lot of mistakes, which may confuse you.SUGGESTION: Delete this sentence. 内容は冗長です。

MY GUESS And as a result, I may not get adequateenough corrections.

In order to avoid such misunderstandings, adding "Nthe "native text" can contributehelp a lot.

For that purpose, wWhen I write the Japanese version as well,of my entries, often I nseedm to writeneed to word-to-word translations or literal translations for that purpose.

However, it's a is often very annoying thing for everyone, so we tend to, so many people avoind writing outheir native tongue versions.

I thinkFor non-fluent language learners, writing in a foreign language without youra native toungue version without any misunderstanding for readers should be your final goalmay give rise to misunderstandings.

Therefore, when you become an advancedSome people believe that advanced language learner, yous should avoid adding youtheir native tongue version, from a certain viespoint, right?

In order to do that, I think redundancy expressions are a must in order toHowever, a certain amount of redundancy can help avoid miscommunication or misunderstandings.

A jJumps in logic isare often very difficult and can be the cause ofuse miscommunication.

People tend to write somethingSome people write dogmatic still, which is veryoften difficult to understand by other people, not yourself (themselves)..

That is why I've been writing this entry containing a lot of redundancy.SUGGESTION: Delete this. Too much redundancy is tedious.

Redundancy May Reduce InternationUniversal Miscommunication

In order to impriove my English, I adopt to've developed the habit of writeing something on LangCorrect, and I cawhere I can then learn from the corrections done by native English speakers.

As I said before that, my English is far from perfect. Ergo, what I'm writing here may also contains a lot of mistakes, which mayight confuse you.

Therefore, when you become an advanced learner, you should avoid adding your native tongue version; at least, from a certain vieswpoints, rightno?

そう思う！

In order to do thatTo do so, I think that redundancyt expressions are a mustkey in order to avoid miscommunication or misunderstanding.

People tend to write something dogmatic, which is very difficult to understand by other people, not yourself (themselves). that are not the individual

That is why I've been writing this entry containing a lot of redundancvery redundant while writing this entry.

Probably I've gotten so far a lot of corrections and comments, regarding the redundancy of this entry.

僕にとって、この投稿には冗長表現ということじゃないと思う

Hahaha ¶
!¶
¶
In short, as a native English speaker, you may feel that my expressions in English are redundant, but it may contribute toin helping you understand the English sentences written by a non-native English speaker.

(I wrote this entry, because some of entries written in Japanese without English version seems very difficult to understand, because I believe there is a jump in logic.)

僕だろう。。。

My opinion is this: Feel free to write redundantly than, as opposed to causing miscommunication with thedue to a lack of words. (?)

皮肉的に、この文章はミスコミュニケーションを起こした。（笑）でも、言いたいことが分かる。。。多分。（笑）