Today, I read a news article.

“New” refers to something that is simply not old. “News” refers specifically to reported events in a newspaper, television or radio.

It talked about the leather industry in kashmir.

In English we typically use the articles “the”, “a”, “an” etc before nouns

I don't know if this article talk onspoke about a specially country.

“talk on” would be awkward usage here. Confusingly “spoke” is generally used as the past tense of “talk”. In the present tense one would say “talks about”. In the past one would say “spoke about”

I believe that it's an international problem and not only for one or two country.ies

We use “an” as the indefinite article if the next word begins with a vowel. It’s just a pronunciation convenience. And we would use the plural of “country” if we have said “one or two”

I think it's a good thing for the world because the kashmir is bad for animals.animals are apparently frequently mistreated in Kashmir

We use an indefinite article “a” even though an adjective comes before the noun ‘thing”. The rest of the sentence is really a case of muddled syntax. I have replaced “Kashmir is bad for animals” with a more natural sounding phrase

I sawhave seen several documentaries on this topic.

“I saw” isn’t wrong but it’s a bit awkward

They have been killing many animals even alives.

I’m not sure of the meaning you are going for here.

Thisese movies are horrible.

We would use the plural “these” in place of the singular “this”

We must be vigilant when we would to buy from kashmir.

We are not buying Kashmir itself. We are buying “from” Kashmir

To buy a cheaper cloth with Kashmir, is badmay mean production. methods unkind to animals

I’m struggling with your meaning here but I have replaced-written what I think you are going for

You might believe that may beIt’s possible that your cloth was made with many animals dead alivekilled in the process.

Again, I’m struggling with your meaning but I have re-written what I think you were going for

It talked about the leather industry in kKashmir.

Kashmir the place or cashmere the fabric? If cashmere, it usually doesn't refer to leather (though that exists).

I don't know if this article talk ons about a speciallyfic country.

I believe that it's a international problem and not only for one or two countryies.

I think it's good thing for the world because the kcashmirere is bad for animals.

Many factories, a lot in cChina, have been hurting animals for thé kasmir.e cashmere

They have been killing many animals even alives.

not sure what 'even alives' was supposed to mean, but as written is incorrect.

So, iI'm not going to cry if many Kcashmirere factories are closing.

We must be vigilant when we wouldtry to buy kcashmirere.

To buy a cheaper cloth with Kcashmirere, is bad production.

You might not believe that may be your clothing is made with many dead animals dead alive.

Some rephrasing based on what I think you mean.

Reading News In English

It talked about the leather industry in kKashmir.

I don't know if this article talk oned about a speciallyfic country.

I believe that it's an international problem and not only for one or two countryies.

I think it's good thing for the world because the kKashmir is bad for animals.

Many factories, a lot of them in cChina, have been hurting animals for thé ke Kashmir.

They have been killing many animals even alives.

Thisese movies are horrible.

So, i'I’m not going to cry if many Kashmir factories are closinge.

We must be vigilant when we wouldant to buy kKashmir.

Vigilant is correct but it sounds pretentious — more common is “careful”

To buy a cheaper cloth with Kashmir, is bad for production.

You might believe that may be your cloth made with many animals dead alive.

Sorry, I was unable to understand this one

Today, I read a news article.

It talked about the leather industry in kKashmir.

It explained that many factories have been closing.

I don't know if this article is talk oning about a speciallyfic country.

I believe that it's an international problem and, not only for one or two country.ies.

I think it's a good thing for the world because the kashmir is bad for animals.

I saw several documentaries on this topic.

Many factories, a lot in cChina, have been hurting animals for thé kasmir.

They have been killing many animals even alives.

Thisese movies are horrible.

So, iI'm not going to cry if many Kashmir factories are closing.

We must be vigilant when we wouldant to buy kKashmir.

To buy a cheaper cloth withfrom Kashmir, is a bad production.idea.

You might believe that it may be your clothhave been made with many animals, dead or alive.