However, I decided to seriously adjust my reading style seriously.

We often put the adverb at the last.

Now I do it every day for approximately one(an) hour before going to sleep.

an hour sounds more native but one is also correct

Thirdly, instead of looking up every new word and makinge an anki-card out of it, as I did earlier, I decided to interrupt my reading flow as rarely as possible.

As far as I know, this type of reading is called extensive learning, and it can also be apply foried to listening.

However, when I have some spare time outside, I don't have noany problem with listening to some podcasts without transcriptions.

Even though I don't learnook up every single unknown word, it helps me to develop my listening skills and just enjoy the content itself.

A goodreat part of them are non-fiction (e.g.

good is nice
great not only can be nice, but also can be a large amount of.

However, I also have some hugebig plans for fiction literaturestories, especially for books which I enjoyed reading in Russian (e.g.

Secondly, I implemenntegrated the habit of reading into my daily routine.

'implemented' sounds like you are implementing a plan or design. Since you're just adding something here I'd use integrating instead. But what you said is not wrong

However, some individuals argue that it does not bring them enough joy, when/as compared to extensive learning.

better flow to use when or as instead of the comma there

Although this idea has merit, I found that combining these two strategies (intensive and extensive learning) makes the most sense for me.

Good use of parentheses to remind an inattentive reader what you mean.

For instance, for my German learning I tend to maximize the deliberate learning part over the "natural" one in order to get a strong foundation ofor an intermediate speaker.

The end of the sentence is a little confusing. I took a guess at how it should be completed

Reading in English.: Extensive vs Intensive Learning

My previous experience had a substantial influencempact not only on my English proficiency, but also on me as a person.

I think "impact" sounds better here. You could also say "was highly influential not only..."

First of all, I have switched my consuming devicthe device I use from a PC to an E-Reader.

"consuming device" sounds wrong.

I've not corrected it, but I think I'm more used to seeing e-reader with a lowercase e.

Secondly, I implemented the habit of reading into my daily routine.

I would say "embedded the habit of reading..." or "implemented/established a daily reading habit". What you have written is correct though.

As far as I know, this type of reading is called extensive learning, and it can also apply forto listening.

On the other handAlternatively, there is so-called intensive learning.

"On the other hand" doesn't feel right here. This might just be me being fussy.

It means that one deliberately learns/studies every new word which hone encounters.

If you're trying to be formal, it seems odd to alternate between "one" and "he".

However, some individuals argue that it does not bring them enough joy, compared to extensive learning.

They believe that the best way to acquire a new language is to (truly/completely) immerse oneself in it: either by reading or by listening.

(not a grammar correction, but I think this is the key difference between intensive and extensive, as arguably you also immerse in intensive reading)

For instance, for my German learning I tend to maximize theime spent on deliberate learning over the "natural" onestyle, in order to get athe strong foundation of a intermediate speaker.

or "I tend to prioritize deliberate learning"

or "a strong intermediate speaking foundation"

Even though I don't learn every single unknown word, it helps me to develop my listening skills and to just enjoy the content itself.

Anyways, I am really excited to start reading again.

"Anyways" is very casual, even for spoken English.

My reading list on GoodReads is overwhelmed with literature!

You could also say "overflowing"

First of all, I have switched my consumreading device from a PC to an E-Reader.

Thirdly, instead of looking up every new word and making an anki- card out of it, as I did earlier, I decided to interrupt my reading flow as rarelylittle as possible.

It means that one deliberately learns every new word which (he encounters / they encounter).

Singular they vs he as a pronoun for a person of unknown or unspecified gender is a topic that can still spark arguments, but personally I think singular they is more common/natural these days

For instance, for my German learning I tend to maximize the deliberate learning over the "natural" onelearning in order to get a strong foundation ofas an intermediate speaker.

A good part of them areit is non-fiction (e.g.

You're talking about a single list - although it is itself a collection, as long as the topic is the list itself, you would use singular pronouns like it.

You could use "them" if the previous sentence had been something like "The books on my reading list are an overwhelming amount of literature", as then the topic would be the books (plural) that make up the list.

However, I also have some huge plans for fiction literature(books), especially for books which I enjoyed reading in Russian (e.g.

People wouldn't really say "fiction literature". Part of it is that "literature" is already implied here, and part of it is "fiction literature" sounds very close to "literary fiction", which despite the generic name, is actually a specific genre of fiction.

"Martin Iden"';, "East of Eden", ''1984'', ''Stoner'' etc.

My previous experience had a substantial influence not only on my English proficiency, but also on me as a person.

Now, I do it every day for approximately one hour before going to sleep.

Thirdly, instead of looking up every new word and making an anki-card out of it, as I did earlier, I decided to interrupt my reading flow as rarely as possible.

It means that one deliberately learns every new word which they encounters.

They believe that the best way to acquire a new language is to immerse oneself in it: either by reading or by listening.

Although this idea has its merits, I found that combining these two strategies (intensive and extensive learning) makes the most sense for me.

For instance, for my German learning, I tend to maximize the deliberate learning over the "natural" one in order to get a strong foundation of an intermediate speaker.

However, when I have some spare time outside, I have no problem with listening to some podcasts without transcriptions.

Even though, I don't learn every single unknown word, it helps me to develop my listening skills and just enjoy the content itself.

"The Innovators",' 'Sapiens'', "A Short History of Nearly Everything'', etc.).

"Martin Iden"';, "East of Eden", ''1984'', ''Stoner'' etc.

).