The admirable beauty of religion is not a cultural deposit,relic, an old and intricate historical book, andor a collection of venerable stories, for atheismts and politicians. The admirable beauty of religion is not a cultural relic, an old and intricate historical book, or a collection of venerable stories for atheists and politicians.

Because the list starts with "is", all of the things after need to be singular. That is why I switched "venerable stories" to "a collection of venerable stories" - so that it is singular and makes sense with "is".

It has powerful magican almost magical ability to lead the people, reshape societies, vacuumspurify court systems, rewrite histories that can bolt onstabilize government, and be used as a splurge oby an astute hand to splurge. It has an almost magical ability to lead the people, reshape societies, purify court systems, rewrite histories that can stabilize government, and be used by an astute hand to splurge.

Fun English writing tip: we love lists of three. Longer lists are of course fine, but lists of three sound have a really nice flow, especially when all three items in the list are similar. "It has the almost magical power to lead people, reshape society, and even rewrite history." Less fun English writing tip: we like being factual. This means that if you want to use exciting metaphors - like calling religion's power "magic" - it sounds odd if you don't downplay it a little bit. That's what I did when I said "an almost magical ability" instead of "powerful magic". I don't know what you mean by "vacuums court systems", "bolt on government" or "be used a splurge on". I made my best guess, but if you can rephrase them (in English or Chinese), I'll be better able to help you find a good way to communicate those ideas in English.

The existence of religion could empower leaders to use a whipforce to pressure people in a righteojust way ands of living or give them a cause to wage a war. The existence of religion could empower leaders to use force to pressure people in just ways of living or give them a cause to wage a war.

What you wrote means "Because religion exists, leaders feel inspired/able to violently - but righteously - force people to do their will and go to war whenever they say." It sounds very very bad. Is that the connotation you wanted?

Looking back at the histories, the politics invisibley, politics have long been tightly tied to religion tightly. Looking back at history, politics have long been tightly tied to religion.

"the histories" or "a history" usually refers to a specific written record of history. Just calling it "history" is usually more natural.

GraduallyOver time, it became one of the tools used to extend the realm and enforce power. Over time, it became one of the tools used to extend the realm and enforce power.

"over time" means "gradually" for longer time scales, like years or decades.

The best explanationargument to show the reality aboutof religious power is that President Trump still visited the pope in Vatican cCity’s pope for rebuilding a benign to rebuild a peaceful diplomaticy relationship, even ifthough the pope publicly disagrees with President Trump’s policy about immigrants ition pubolicy. The best argument to show the reality of religious power is that President Trump still visited the pope in Vatican City to rebuild a peaceful diplomatic relationship, even though the pope publicly disagrees with President Trump’s immigration policy.

benign = not threatening, harmless - doesn't make sense to call a diplomatic relationship benign

But after that hop, assuming President Trump tooklearned a lesson whenabout how religious powers are stronger enough to couple with society and control the windntrol the course of society, no president would jeopardize their position with reckless posturing toin the way they handle religious issues. But after that, assuming President Trump learned a lesson about how religious powers are strong enough to control the course of society, no president would jeopardize their position with reckless posturing in the way they handle religious issues.