Thanks for reading! Thanks for reading!

With the arrival of AI (artificial intelligence), some people are worried to looseabout losing their job. With the arrival of AI (artificial intelligence), some people are worried about losing their job.

Both are correct, this just sounds more natural

With the arrival of AI (aArtificial iIntelligence), some people are worried to loose their job. With the arrival of AI (Artificial Intelligence), some people are worried to loose their job.

Artificial Intelligence should be capital because the abbreviation AI itself is always capitalised

With the arrival of AI (aArtificial iIntelligence), some people are worried to looseabout losing their job. With the arrival of AI (Artificial Intelligence), some people are worried about losing their job.

Capitalize the long-form of acronyms. To show the type of worry, or describe the action of worrying, use "about" instead of "to". Loose is in regards to fit, like a loose shoelace; should be "lose". Use the verb + ing form when turning an action into a noun, such as "I am (taking a test)" or "losing my job" or "smiling".

Previously, we predicted that now, we'lld be working at home or that robots willould work for us ad take our jobs. Previously, we predicted that now, we'd be working at home or that robots would work for us ad take our jobs.

Previously, we predicted that now, we'll be working atfrom home or that robots will work for us and take our jobs. Previously, we predicted that now, we'll be working from home or that robots will work for us and take our jobs.

It is always 'work FROM home" since you are away from the main area for the object to occur. Not ad, and.

Previously, we predicted that now, we'lld be working at home or that robots will work for us and take our jobs by now. Previously, we predicted that we'd be working at home or that robots will work for us and take our jobs by now.

The placement of "now" in the sentence feels unnatural for a native speaker. Better to put it at the end of the sentence. We'll is too strong in this case since it conveys certainty. "We'd" is better because it shows the potential of the situation.

The first prediction, during the Covid-19 became true but the robots haven't taken (or weren't takeing) our job at all. The first prediction, during the Covid-19 became true but the robots haven't taken (or weren't taking) our job at all.

The first prediction, during the Covid-19OVID-19 pandemic became true, but the robots weren't takeing our jobs at all. The first prediction during the COVID-19 pandemic became true, but the robots weren't taking our jobs at all.

No need for a comma before during, COVID-19 is an event which should be spelt according to how it is intended to be spelt by organization so it needs some tweaks, and weren't is the auxiliary word for negative past continuous, and in present continuous, the verb has an "-ing" at the end so that should also be the case for the present continuous tenses

The first of those prediction,s came true during the Covid-19 became true, but the robots weredidn't take our jobs at all. The first of those predictions came true during Covid-19, but the robots didn't take our jobs at all.

"first prediction" too vague and it isn't clear what you mean. Need to give more context by referring back, saying "first of those". "Became true" is unnatural. "Came true", like a "wish come true" is more natural. "during Covid-19" part is grammatically correct, but pacing feels choppy. Fix by putting it after the verb in the phrase. "Weren't take" is not correct". Either "Did not take" or "weren't taking" is fine. Use a comma (,) when fixing together two phrases with "but".

I think it's very difficult to predict the future because it's mysterious and we can't know how will be tomorrow will be. I think it's very difficult to predict the future because it's mysterious and we can't know how tomorrow will be.

I think it's very difficult to predict the future because it's mysterious and we can't know how it will be tomorrow. I think it's very difficult to predict the future because it's mysterious and we can't know how it will be tomorrow.

"It" should be added because anything can be "it", like the situation, or something else.

I think it's very difficult to predict the future because it's mysterious and we cadon't know howwhat will behappen tomorrow. I think it's very difficult to predict the future because it's mysterious and we don't know what will happen tomorrow.

If you use mysterious, you convey uncertainty. Using "can't" expresses a level of certainty and sounds funny. "How" seems to refer to the method of an event, while "what" refers to the event itself. Use "what" instead.

An economic expert thinks that AI will take some jobs, but other jobs will crop up. An economic expert thinks that AI will take some jobs, but other jobs will crop up.

Comma before "but".

The billionaire Elon Musk thinks in a few years, we won't have to work thanks to AI. The billionaire Elon Musk thinks in a few years, we won't have to work thanks to AI.

Double l in billionaire, and we say “a few years” when we mean some years—enough to matter. If we say “few years” without “a,” it sounds like not many at all, maybe too little. The word “a” makes the meaning more positive.

The billionaire Elon Musk thinks in few years, we won't have to work thanks to AI. The billionaire Elon Musk thinks in few years, we won't have to work thanks to AI.

spelling error: billionaire

I think it's not that good if that really happens because people will be less intelligent and I think we could be in danger if AI take the pows power (or takes over.) I think it's not that good if that really happens because people will be less intelligent and I think we could be in danger if AI takes power (or takes over)

I think it's not that good if that really happens because people will be less intelligent, and I think we could be in danger if AI takes the power. I think it's not that good if that really happens because people will be less intelligent, and I think we could be in danger if AI takes the power.

Intelligent with a double l, comma before and, and "AI take" is not correct because the verb form HAS to agree with the noun's plurality, meaning that because AI is a singular concept, the verb changes to takes because take is for plural nouns, so it should be 'AI takes'