Sept. 1, 2023
Please Review My IELTS Essay
Should governments make decisions about people’s lifestyle, or should people make their own decisions?
Some advocate for government control over people's way of life, while others argue for individual autonomy. In my opinion, who should have the authority depends on the impact of the actions.
Certain lifestyle decisions should be regulated by the government. Individual behavior often impacts not only themselves but also others. Hence, to protect public well-being, the government should have the right to impose regulations and restrictions on individual actions that can bring negative consequences for others. For example, smoking not only affects the smoker's health but also the health of those inhaling second-hand smoke nearby. As a result, law enforcement authorities should ban public smoking to protect non-smokers who share the same public spaces with smokers.
In other situations, individuals should have the freedom to make their own choices. There are lifestyle decisions, such as fashion and romantic choices or dietary and entertainment preferences, that have limited or negligible impact on the well-being of others. Government regulation of these aspects can lead to feelings of oppression and resentment towards authority, which can result in protests, strikes, and other forms of social discord. This can have a detrimental impact on the economy and public safety. One compelling example of this dynamic is the protests of a group of Iranian women against their government-mandated hijab law.
In conclusion, for the interests of society as a whole, the government should have control over lifestyle decisions that can harm or infringe upon the rights of others. Nonetheless, individuals should have the autonomy to make decisions that are harmless to others because restrictions on such choices can lead to social unrest.
Please Review My IELTS Essay
Should governments make decisions about people’s lifestyle, or should people make their own decisions?
Some advocate for government control over people's way of life, while others argue for individual autonomy.
In my opinion, who should have the authority depends on the impact of the actions.
Hence, to protect public well-being, the government should have the right to impose regulations and restrictions on individual actions that can bring negative consequences forto others.
Sept. 1, 2023
Thank you very much.
|
Please Review My IELTS Essay This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
Should governments make decisions about people’s lifestyle, or should people make their own decisions? This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
Some advocate for government control over people's way of life, while others argue for individual autonomy. This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
In my opinion, who should have the authority depends on the impact of the actions. In my opinion, who should have the authority depends on the impact of the action |
|
Certain lifestyle decisions should be regulated by the government. |
|
Individual behavior often impacts not only themselves but also others. |
|
Hence, to protect public well-being, the government should have the right to impose regulations and restrictions on individual actions that can bring negative consequences for others. Hence, to protect public well-being, the government should have the right to impose regulations and restrictions on individual actions that can bring negative consequences |
|
For example, smoking not only affects the smoker's health but also the health of those inhaling second-hand smoke nearby. |
|
As a result, law enforcement authorities should ban public smoking to protect non-smokers who share the same public spaces with smokers. |
|
In other situations, individuals should have the freedom to make their own choices. |
|
There are lifestyle decisions, such as fashion and romantic choices or dietary and entertainment preferences, that have limited or negligible impact on the well-being of others. |
|
Government regulation of these aspects can lead to feelings of oppression and resentment towards authority, which can result in protests, strikes, and other forms of social discord. |
|
This can have a detrimental impact on the economy and public safety. |
|
One compelling example of this dynamic is the protests of a group of Iranian women against their government-mandated hijab law. |
|
In conclusion, for the interests of society as a whole, the government should have control over lifestyle decisions that can harm or infringe upon the rights of others. |
|
Nonetheless, individuals should have the autonomy to make decisions that are harmless to others because restrictions on such choices can lead to social unrest. |
You need LangCorrect Premium to access this feature.
Go Premium