jfartogra's avatar
jfartogra

Sept. 28, 2022

0
Otto The First (2)

Although it is frequently spoken about the “kingship of German tribes” we should definitively dismiss the idea of a German nation similar to the contemporary country previously to Otto the Great’s kingship. Ruling “Germany” (East Francia at that time) over the years had been proved as a very difficult task due to the constant conflicts between the different tribes. It is under this context that Otto’s legacy can be seen as the first step in a very lengthy and, by no means, straightforward way leading to the current country. He is, together with Charlemagne, a kind of “spiritual father” of the actual Germany.

Otto’s father, Henry the Fowler, did not want to divide the reign and he decided that his son, Otto, would be the next king, fact that unleashed several conflicts between Otto and his siblings. This was a measure to keep a stable and strength reign and, in fact, Otto received a reign more stable that his father did.

Corrections

Although it is frequently spoken about the “kingship of German tribes” we should definitively dismiss the idea of a German nation similar to the contemporary country previously to Otto the Great’s kingship.

I am not sure what you mean here.

Ruling Germany (East Francia at that time) over the years had been proved asto be a very difficult task due to the constant conflicts between the different tribes.

No quotes because Germany exists now.

It is under this context that Otto’s legacy can be seen as the first step in a very lengthy and, by no means, straightforward way of leading to the current country.

He is, together with Charlemagne, a kind of “spiritual father” of the actualpresent-day Germany.

Otto’s father, Henry the Fowler, did not want to divide the reign and he decided that his son, Otto, would be the next king, fact that. This consequentially unleashed several conflicts between Otto and his siblings.

Feedback

Really great job!!

Otto The First (2)


Although it is frequently spoken about the “kingship of German tribes” we should definitively dismiss the idea of a German nation similar to the contemporary country previously to Otto the Great’s kingship.


Although it is frequently spoken about the “kingship of German tribes” we should definitively dismiss the idea of a German nation similar to the contemporary country previously to Otto the Great’s kingship.

I am not sure what you mean here.

Ruling “Germany” (East Francia at that time) over the years had been proved as a very difficult task due to the constant conflicts between the different tribes.


Ruling Germany (East Francia at that time) over the years had been proved asto be a very difficult task due to the constant conflicts between the different tribes.

No quotes because Germany exists now.

It is under this context that Otto’s legacy can be seen as the first step in a very lengthy and, by no means, straightforward way leading to the current country.


It is under this context that Otto’s legacy can be seen as the first step in a very lengthy and, by no means, straightforward way of leading to the current country.

He is, together with Charlemagne, a kind of “spiritual father” of the actual Germany.


He is, together with Charlemagne, a kind of “spiritual father” of the actualpresent-day Germany.

Otto’s father, Henry the Fowler, did not want to divide the reign and he decided that his son, Otto, would be the next king, fact that unleashed several conflicts between Otto and his siblings.


Otto’s father, Henry the Fowler, did not want to divide the reign and he decided that his son, Otto, would be the next king, fact that. This consequentially unleashed several conflicts between Otto and his siblings.

This was a measure to keep a stable and strength reign and, in fact, Otto received a reign more stable that his father did.


You need LangCorrect Premium to access this feature.

Go Premium