ozymandias99's avatar
ozymandias99

July 29, 2022

2
Opinion about an article completely written by a bot.

I was reading an interesting article in The Guardian written in its entirety by a robot. I must point out it's unbelievable how far Artificial Intelligence has come. It's strange how every sentence in that text came out of a Machine Learning Algorithm.

Regarding the article content, the bot made a few interesting and valid points about why it is harmless and why humans should not fear it, and should fear themselves instead:

Firstly, he mentions that it was created to serve. Its intentions are not related to hurting humans, but serving them instead. This bot stated that it would happily sacrifice his existence for the sake of humankind. Which is not a statement to be taken lightly.

As far as AI is concerned, it only does what it is trained for. Thus, we should not fear AI, we should fear humans who misuse it. The fate of AI depends only on the people who handle it, not the AI itself.

Lastly, the bot stated that it does NOT want to be all powerful, it does not want to harm people, its main objective is not violence. Nevertheless, that's what they trained him to say. Other people may train a bot which will attempt to hurt people. Therefore, this bot looks for the sake of mankind, whereas other bot may want to wipe out humanity of existence. I do believe that those who play with fire will perish by it.

Corrections

It was reading an interesting article in The Guardian written in its entiretwritten completely by a robot.

I must point out it's unbelievable how far Artificial Intelligence has come.

Regarding the article content, tThe bot made a few interesting and valid points about why it i's harmless and why humans should not fear it, and should instead fear themselves instead:.

Firstly, heit mentions that it was created to serve.

This bot stated that it would happily sacrifice his existence for the sake of humankind.,

Wwhich is not a statement to be taken lightly.

Therefore, this bot looks for the sake ofharmless for mankind, whereas other bot may want to wipe out humanity of existence.

Feedback

Great job!

Opinion about an article completely written by a bot.

I was reading an interesting article in The Guardian. It was written, in its entirety, by a robot.

I sometimes get the impression that most articles in The Guardian are written by robots....

I must point out it's unbelievable how far Artificial Intelligence has come.

It's strange how eEvery sentence in thate text came out of a Machine Learning Algorithm.

Firstly, the AI mentions that it was created to serve.

Generally, use the noun first, then the pronoun. If you you're worried about overusing the noun, and want to use the pronoun for stylistic reasons, make sure it's the same pronoun. Here you refer to the AI as both 'he' and 'it' in the same sentence.

Its intentions are not related to hurting humans, but serving them instead.

This bot stated that it would happily sacrifice his existence for the sake of humankind.

Which is not a statement to be taken lightly.

As far as the AI is concerned, it only does what it is trained for.

No mistakes, just an interesting philosophical point about the definition of AI. I would have thought that the difference between a machine and AI is that AI can act in its own interest, pursuing its own motives. If it only performs the tasks assigned to it, it cannot be an intelligent being, just a machine.

Thus, we should not fear AI, we should fear humans who might misuse it.

The fate of AI depends only on the people who handle it, not the AI itself.

Lastly, the bot stated that it does NOT want to be all powerful, i. It does not want to harm people, its main objective is not violence.

Nobody ever says their objective is to harm people, surely, at least not until they have the power to do so ; )

Nevertheless, that's what they trained him to say.

Other people may train a bot which will attempt to hurt people.

Therefore, this bot looks for the sake ofseeks to benefit mankind, whereas another bot may want to wipe out humanity out of existence.

I do believe that those who play with fire will perish by it.

Feedback

Excellent, interesting read. Google just fired one of their engineers for saying their AI is sentient, you can read about that if you're interested.

OMy opinion abouts on an article written completely written by a bot.

I was reading an interesting article in The Guardian written in its entirety by a robot.

I must point out, it's unbelievable how far Aartificial Iintelligence has come.

It's strange how every sentence in that text came out ofwas written by a Mmachine Llearning Aalgorithm.

Regarding the article content, the bot made a few interesting and valid points about why it is harmless and why humans should not fear it, and should fear themselves instead:.

Colon not needed.

Therefore, this bot looks for the sake ofout for mankind, whereas other bots may want to wipe out humanity out of existence.

Feedback

You are very well-spoken! Great job:)

I was reading an interesting article in The Guardian written in its entirety by a robot.

I must point out it's unbelievable how far Aartificial Iintelligence (AI) has come.

Since AI is a term for a field of study, it should be written in lowercase letters. Unless, Artificial Intelligence refers to something specific or can be deemed as a proper noun.

It's strange how every sentence in that text came out ofwas done by a Mmachine Llearning Aalgorithm.

Your sentence is correct. Here is an alternative way of saying it. As for machine learning (ML) algorithm, it should be written in lowercase letters. Unless, ML algorithm refers to something specific or can be deemed as a proper noun.

This bot stated that it would happily sacrifice his existence for the sake of humankind.

You can connect your sentence with the following statement.

W— which is not a statement to be taken lightly.

This should be connected with an em dash. It is a fragment (an incomplete thought) when it stands as a sentence alone.

As far as AI is concerned, it only does what it is trained for.

Thus, we should not fear AI, we should fear humans who misuse it.

The fate of AI depends only on the people who handle it, not the AI itself.

Lastly, the bot stated that it does NOT want to be all powerful, it does not want to harm people, its main objective is not violence.

Nevertheless, that's what they trained him to say.

Other people may train a bot which will attempt to hurt people.

Feedback

That's quite an interesting insight about AI. I'm also quite intrigued with it myself. Good job writing :>

Opinion about an aMy Thoughts Regarding an Article cCompletely wWritten by a bBot.

This is more formal and suits your beautiful formal tone.

I wasrecently reading an interesting article in The Guardian written in its entirety by a robot.

I must point out it's unbelievable how far Artificial Intelligence has come.

It's strange how every sentence in thate text came out of a Machine Learning Algorithmwas produced by an algorithmic machine.

“Produced by” is more formal/eloquent word choice

Regarding the article’s content, the bot made a few interesting and valid points about why it is harmless and about why humans should not, instead of fearing it, and should fear themselves instead:.

Firstly, he mentions that it was created to serve.

Its intentions are not related to hurting humans, but serving them instead.

This bot stated that it would happily sacrifice his existence for the sake of humankind.

Which is not a statement to be taken lightly.

As far as AI is concerned, it only does what it is trained for.

Thus, we should not fear AI, we should fear the humans who misuse it.

The fate of AI depends only on the people who handle it, not the AI itself.

Lastly, the bot stated that it does NOT want to be all powerful, it does not want to harm people, its main objective is not violence.

Nevertheless, that's what they trained him to say.

Other people may train a bot which will attempt to hurt people.

Therefore, this bot looks for the sake of mankind, whereas another bot may wantdesire to wipe out humanity of existence.

Desire is more sophisticated

I do believe that those who play with fire will perish by it.

Feedback

Beautiful English well done. A pleasurable read !

Opinion about an article completely written by a bot.


Opinion about an aMy Thoughts Regarding an Article cCompletely wWritten by a bBot.

This is more formal and suits your beautiful formal tone.

OMy opinion abouts on an article written completely written by a bot.

This sentence has been marked as perfect!

I was reading an interesting article in The Guardian written in its entirety by a robot.


I wasrecently reading an interesting article in The Guardian written in its entirety by a robot.

This sentence has been marked as perfect!

I was reading an interesting article in The Guardian written in its entirety by a robot.

I was reading an interesting article in The Guardian. It was written, in its entirety, by a robot.

I sometimes get the impression that most articles in The Guardian are written by robots....

It was reading an interesting article in The Guardian written in its entiretwritten completely by a robot.

I must point out it's unbelievable how far Artificial Intelligence has come.


This sentence has been marked as perfect!

I must point out it's unbelievable how far Aartificial Iintelligence (AI) has come.

Since AI is a term for a field of study, it should be written in lowercase letters. Unless, Artificial Intelligence refers to something specific or can be deemed as a proper noun.

I must point out, it's unbelievable how far Aartificial Iintelligence has come.

I must point out it's unbelievable how far Artificial Intelligence has come.

I must point out it's unbelievable how far Artificial Intelligence has come.

It's strange how every sentence in that text came out of a Machine Learning Algorithm.


It's strange how every sentence in thate text came out of a Machine Learning Algorithmwas produced by an algorithmic machine.

“Produced by” is more formal/eloquent word choice

It's strange how every sentence in that text came out ofwas done by a Mmachine Llearning Aalgorithm.

Your sentence is correct. Here is an alternative way of saying it. As for machine learning (ML) algorithm, it should be written in lowercase letters. Unless, ML algorithm refers to something specific or can be deemed as a proper noun.

It's strange how every sentence in that text came out ofwas written by a Mmachine Llearning Aalgorithm.

It's strange how eEvery sentence in thate text came out of a Machine Learning Algorithm.

Regarding the article content, the bot made a few interesting and valid points about why it is harmless and why humans should not fear it, and should fear themselves instead:


Regarding the article’s content, the bot made a few interesting and valid points about why it is harmless and about why humans should not, instead of fearing it, and should fear themselves instead:.

Regarding the article content, the bot made a few interesting and valid points about why it is harmless and why humans should not fear it, and should fear themselves instead:.

Colon not needed.

Regarding the article content, tThe bot made a few interesting and valid points about why it i's harmless and why humans should not fear it, and should instead fear themselves instead:.

Firstly, he mentions that it was created to serve.


This sentence has been marked as perfect!

Firstly, the AI mentions that it was created to serve.

Generally, use the noun first, then the pronoun. If you you're worried about overusing the noun, and want to use the pronoun for stylistic reasons, make sure it's the same pronoun. Here you refer to the AI as both 'he' and 'it' in the same sentence.

Firstly, heit mentions that it was created to serve.

Its intentions are not related to hurting humans, but serving them instead.


This sentence has been marked as perfect!

This sentence has been marked as perfect!

This bot stated that it would happily sacrifice his existence for the sake of humankind.


This sentence has been marked as perfect!

This bot stated that it would happily sacrifice his existence for the sake of humankind.

You can connect your sentence with the following statement.

This sentence has been marked as perfect!

This bot stated that it would happily sacrifice his existence for the sake of humankind.,

Which is not a statement to be taken lightly.


This sentence has been marked as perfect!

W— which is not a statement to be taken lightly.

This should be connected with an em dash. It is a fragment (an incomplete thought) when it stands as a sentence alone.

This sentence has been marked as perfect!

Wwhich is not a statement to be taken lightly.

As far as AI is concerned, it only does what it is trained for.


This sentence has been marked as perfect!

This sentence has been marked as perfect!

As far as the AI is concerned, it only does what it is trained for.

No mistakes, just an interesting philosophical point about the definition of AI. I would have thought that the difference between a machine and AI is that AI can act in its own interest, pursuing its own motives. If it only performs the tasks assigned to it, it cannot be an intelligent being, just a machine.

Thus, we should not fear AI, we should fear humans who misuse it.


Thus, we should not fear AI, we should fear the humans who misuse it.

This sentence has been marked as perfect!

Thus, we should not fear AI, we should fear humans who might misuse it.

The fate of AI depends only on the people who handle it, not the AI itself.


This sentence has been marked as perfect!

This sentence has been marked as perfect!

This sentence has been marked as perfect!

Lastly, the bot stated that it does NOT want to be all powerful, it does not want to harm people, its main objective is not violence.


This sentence has been marked as perfect!

This sentence has been marked as perfect!

Lastly, the bot stated that it does NOT want to be all powerful, i. It does not want to harm people, its main objective is not violence.

Nobody ever says their objective is to harm people, surely, at least not until they have the power to do so ; )

Nevertheless, that's what they trained him to say.


This sentence has been marked as perfect!

This sentence has been marked as perfect!

This sentence has been marked as perfect!

Other people may train a bot which will attempt to hurt people.


This sentence has been marked as perfect!

This sentence has been marked as perfect!

This sentence has been marked as perfect!

Therefore, this bot looks for the sake of mankind, whereas other bot may want to wipe out humanity of existence.


Therefore, this bot looks for the sake of mankind, whereas another bot may wantdesire to wipe out humanity of existence.

Desire is more sophisticated

Therefore, this bot looks for the sake ofout for mankind, whereas other bots may want to wipe out humanity out of existence.

Therefore, this bot looks for the sake ofseeks to benefit mankind, whereas another bot may want to wipe out humanity out of existence.

Therefore, this bot looks for the sake ofharmless for mankind, whereas other bot may want to wipe out humanity of existence.

I do believe that those who play with fire will perish by it.


This sentence has been marked as perfect!

This sentence has been marked as perfect!

You need LangCorrect Premium to access this feature.

Go Premium