Today, I decided to write a few lines about compulsoryive purchases.

I think that for some people it is a real disorder that is difficult to deal with, especially when youthey are on a budget.

The pronoun refers to "some people," so you should use the third person

I'm even sure some people are even facing debt distress because of it.

This is technically a slightly different sense than what you wrote, but it sounds more native-like (and I am guessing it is what you may have intended)

I don't know if this disorder can be cured by the help of a psychological therapy.

In any case, I wish good luckthe best to everyone that suffers from it.

What you wrote is not incorrect, but this sounds a little more native-like.

I already saw a TV show, where genealogists were going to some dead people's' houses to find any information about a potential heirs.

Some houses were full of objects and it was impossible to even glimpse a tile on the floor.

We usually use the word "even" when we say that we "cannot glimpse" something in English; here, it connotes the sense of "there was so much stuff on the ground, that *even glimpsing* [that is, *even seeing the tiniest amount of*] tile was impossible".

These people had piled a huge variety of things up duringover many years.

They didn't even take out the trashes anymore.

"trash" is always singular in English.

I can't imagine the malodorouspungent smell in the whole house!

"malodorous" is indeed a word in English, but it is not nearly as common as "maloderant" in French. "Pungent" (which basically just means "strong") is more appropriate here.

Do I suffer from compulsoryive purchasesing disorder?

I'm not 100% confident about this correction, but I am sure that the grammar of the original sentence is not correct.

Actually, no.

This is grammatically correct as written, but the "flow" of this sentence with the rest of the document is a bit awkward. I think other good options might have been either just "No." or "In my opinion, no."

ButHowever, I would say that, when I'm feeling down, I will tend to buy more useless goods.

I try to follow a habit aboutdo the following when buying stuff.things:

Generally, I wait before buying something, and tell myself,: if you still think about it many times in the week, that is maybe because it is a real need or you really want it as a decoration in your house.

For a decade now I have self-treated myself about compulsoryive clothes buying.

So it is not really a way to less consuming atin the end.

It's soon the Black Friday soon, and many people are thrilled by this event.

This massive bargain doesidn't existed in France some years ago.

It has been imported from the United- States.

They add a reduced price on a new label, that is glued on the old one which have ...the same... price!

By nature, I always have been a kind of minimalist, but I don’t want fall down insuccumb to a sectarian mindset.

Slightly more native-sounding

I guess alleverything needs to be balanced in life, and it’s hard to never buy something useless once in your life.

Aand it’s not necessary to feel guilty about it.

(this should be combined with the previous sentence with a comma)

After all we grow up in a consumerist society so it’s totally normal we tend to always be tempted by some new items.

Today, I decided to write a few lines about compulsoryive purchases.

Compulsory = required; compulsive = impulsively, on a whim

I think that for some people it is a real disorder that is difficult to deal with, especially when youthey are on a budget.

The original would sound fine to a lot of native speakers, but this is more correct.

I'm even sure some people are facing debt distress because of it.

If you want to emphasize how difficult the situation, you could say "enormous debts," "mounting debts," etc.

I don't know if this disorder can be cured by the help of a psychological therapy.

In any case, I wish good luck to everyone thatwho suffers from it.

Use "who" or "whom" (depending on the situation) when referring to people.

I already saw a TV show, where genealogists were going to some dead people's houses to find any information about a potential heirs.

"Any" has a sort of negative sense to it, so it isn't quite appropriate here.

Some houses were full of objects, and it was impossible to (even) glimpse a tile on the floor.

The original is fine, but adding "even" for emphasis could be a good idea.

These people had piled a huge variety of things up duringover many years.

They didn't even take out the trashes anymore.

"Trash" is always singular.

Do I suffer from compulsoryive purchases disordering?

I don't think it's the name of a disorder per se, so this wording makes more sense.

For a decade now I have self-treated myself about compulsory clothes buying tendency to buy clothes compulsively.

Or "my compulsive clothes-buying"

So it is not really a way to less consuming atption in the end.

It's soon the Black Friday, and many people are thrilled by this event.

This massive bargain doesidn't existed in France some years ago.

When negating, "do" is the verb that will be in the past tense.

It has been imported from the United- States.

No hyphen in English.

They add a reduced price on a new label, that is glued on the old one, which haves the same... price!

I guess all needs to be balanced in life and it’s hard to never buy something useless at least once in your life.

More idiomatic.

After all we grow up in a consumerist society, so it’s totally normal that we tend to always be tempted by some new items.