What I learrned today in the 6 mMinutes English podcast What I learned today in the 6 Minute English podcast

I googled the podcast name as 6 Minutes English sounded strange grammatically. It sounds like it's actually called 6 Minute English, which is more natural

What I learrnt today in thea 6 minutes English podcast What I learnt today in a 6 minute English podcast

What I learrned today in thefrom a 6 -minutes English podcast What I learned today from a 6-minute English podcast

What I lLearrn tned Today in the 6 m-Minutes English pPodcast What I Learned Today in the 6-Minute English Podcast

What I learrnt today in the 6 minutes English podcast What I learnt today in the 6 minutes English podcast

"Learnt" is British English and "learned" is American English - I'm English so I naturally corrected it to "learnt" but it depends on which one you're learning :)

Today, I listened to a 6 mMinutes English podcast to imoprove my english. Today, I listened to a 6 Minute English podcast to improve my english.

Today, I listened ato a 6 minutes English podcast to imoprove my eEnglish. Today, I listened to a 6 minute English podcast to improve my English.

Today, I listened a 6 minutes English podcast to imoprove my eEnglish. Today I listened a 6 minute English podcast to improve my English.

Today, I listened to a 6 -minutes English podcast to imoprove my eEnglish. Today, I listened to a 6-minute English podcast to improve my English.

Today, I listened a 6 minutes English podcast to imoprove my eEnglish. Today, I listened a 6 minutes English podcast to improve my English.

It was about a country that measures the happiness. It was about a country that measures happiness.

happiness is an uncountable noun so doesn't take a "the"

It was about a country that measures their happiness. It was about a country that measures their happiness.

You could also use 'it's' or 'it's own'

It was about a country that measures the happiness. It was about a country that measures happiness.

It was about a country that measures the happiness. It was about a country that measures happiness.

I liked it,; it was interesting. I liked it; it was interesting.

I learnt that here is an international Day for the happiness, it's (on) the 20th of March. I learnt that here is an international Day for happiness, it's (on) the 20th of March.

More natural to include the "on" here though it is grammatically valid without

I learnt that there is an international Day for the happiness, it's the 20th of March. I learnt that there is an international Day for happiness, it's the 20th of March.

You could also say - it's on the 20th March.

I learnted that there is an iInternational Day for the hHappiness, it's the 20th of March. I learned that there is an International Day for Happiness, it's the 20th of March.

I learnt that there is an iInternational Day for the happiness, it's the 20th of Marcof Happiness on March 20th. I learnt that there is an International Day of Happiness on March 20th.

I learnt that there is an international Dday for the happiness, it's the 20th of March. I learnt that there is an international day for happiness, it's the 20th of March.

I don't remember the name of the country I spoke about, but it is a country located in Asia, and they said that it was never colonised so it haves all the traditions from the last centuries. I don't remember the name of the country I spoke about, but it is a country located in Asia, and they said that it was never colonised so it has all the traditions from the last centuries.

You could say 'previous' centuries.

I don't remember the name of the country Iit spoke about but it is a country located in Asia and they said that it was never colonised so it haves all the traditions from the lastprevious centuries. I don't remember the name of the country it spoke about but it is a country located in Asia and they said that it was never colonised so it has all the traditions from previous centuries.

A single country is being discussed, so it uses "has" instead of "have"

I don't remember the name of the country Iit spoke about but it is a country located in Asia and they said that it was never colonised so it haved all the traditions from the last centuries. I don't remember the name of the country it spoke about but it is a country located in Asia and they said that it was never colonised so it had all the traditions from the last centuries.

I don't remember the name of the country I spothat it talked about, but it is a country located in Asia, and they said that it was never coloniszed, so it haves all the traditions from the lastprevious centuries. I don't remember the name of the country that it talked about, but it is a country located in Asia, and they said that it was never colonized, so it has all the traditions from previous centuries.

I've seen "colonized" spelled with both a "z" and an "s," but for some reason, LangCorrect only accepts the "z" version as the correct form.

I don't remember the name of the country Iit spoke about but it iwas a country located in Asia and they said that it was never colonised so it haves all the traditions from the last few centuries. I don't remember the name of the country it spoke about but it was a country located in Asia and they said that it was never colonised so it has all the traditions from the last few centuries.

But they had a problem because a lot of people were leaving the country because of thefor work and to earn more money. But they had a problem because a lot of people were leaving the country for work and to earn more money.

But they had a problem because a lot of people were leaving the country because of the work and to earn more money. But they had a problem because a lot of people were leaving the country because of the work and to earn more money.

because of 'lack of' work

But they had a problem because a lot of people were leaving the country because of the work and to earn more money. But they had a problem because a lot of people were leaving the country because of work and to earn more money.

But they had a problem because a lot of people were leaving the country because of the work andfor work in order to earn more money. But they had a problem because a lot of people were leaving the country for work in order to earn more money.

This is to establish a logical path of reasoning.

But they had a problem because a lot of people were leaving the country because ofdue to finding the work and to earning more money. But they had a problem because a lot of people were leaving the country due to finding the work and earning more money.

So they went into India for example. So they went to India for example.

So they went into India for example. So they went to India for example.

So they went into Indaia, for example. So they went to India, for example.

So they went into Indaia, for example. So they went to India, for example.

SoFor example, they went into India for example. For example, they went to India.

"So" doesn't really work here with the "for example" on the end. I went with the format using "for example" and I personally would've put it at the beginning as it sounds more natural to me but at the end does still make sense :)

I liked this epidsode. I liked this episode.

I liked this epidsode. I liked this episode.

I liked this epidsode. I liked this episode.

I liked this epidsode. I liked this episode.

I liked this epidsode. I liked this episode.

And to they made come back, they spend 100 000 000 (I don't know how to say that numberthis would be "100 million", but that sounds like a very very large number for the article being discussed) of dollars. And to come back, they spend 100 000 000 (this would be "100 million", but that sounds like a very very large number for the article being discussed) of dollars.

And to they made come back, they spend 100 000 000 (I don't know how to say that number) of dollars. And to they made come back, they spend 100 000 000 (I don't know how to say that number) dollars.

Sorry, I don't quite understand the first part of this sentence, maybe - In order to come back,...? Also, 100 million dollars?

And towhen they made cocame back, they spendt 100 000 000 (I don't know how to say that number) of dollars. And when they came back, they spent 100 000 000 (I don't know how to say that number) of dollars.

And towhen they made comoney and came back, they spend 100 000 000 (I don't know how to say that number)t hundreds of thousands of dollars. And when they made money and came back, they spent hundreds of thousands of dollars.

I'm not sure if I've correctly interpreted what you're trying to say here, so please let me know if I got this right.

And to they mademake them come back, they spendt 100 000 000 (I don't know how to say that number) of dollars. And to make them come back, they spent 100 000 000 (I don't know how to say that number) of dollars.

$100,000,000 = one hundred million dollars