First Argue onment about my jJob First Argument about my Job

First Argue on my jobment at My Work First Argument at My Work

- Argue comes from the verb 'to argue' but 'argument' is the noun to describe that a dispute happened - job is quite casual, the word work fits better here - You are always 'at' work never on 'work'

First Argue on my jment on the Job First Argument on the Job

First Argue oment On mMy jJob First Argument On My Job

Proper capitalization in your title. I think what you meant is argument.

I had a first Arhuegument with a project manager. I had a first Argument with a project manager.

I had amy first Arhueargument with a project manager. I had my first argument with a project manager.

I had amy first Arhuegument with a project manager. I had my first Argument with a project manager.

I had amy first Arhueargument with a project manager. I had my first argument with a project manager.

“my first argument” sounds more natural than “a first argue.”

We disagreed about the delivery method. We disagreed about the delivery method.

We disagreed about my delivery method. We disagreed about my delivery method.

- I presume you are talking about you're delivery method so added 'my' otherwise it's unclear what exactly you are talking about

We disagreed about the delivery method. We disagreed about the delivery method.

Add “the” before “delivery method” for proper article usage.

It was a really deep talking, because he has not experienced as a developer, so he did not know why we has different workflow. It was a really deep talking, because he has not experienced as a developer, so he did not know why we has different workflow.

It was a really deep talkingconversation, because he has not experience as a developer, so he did not know why we hasve different workflows. It was a really deep conversation, because he has no experience as a developer, so he did not know why we have different workflows.

- Either 'has no experience...' or 'has not had experience...' - Conjugations are I have, you have, he/she has, we have, they have -> need to use have not has because you are using we not he/she - Because you are talking about two people, there are two workflows so workflow needs to be plural

It was a really deep talkingconversation, because he has not experience as a developer, so he did not know why we hasve different workflow. It was a really deep conversation, because he has no experience as a developer, so he did not know why we have different workflow.

I don't think "deep" is the word you want to use here. Deep would suggest that you delved into fine details. A deep conversation would be one where you really understand the other side and broaden your perspectives.

It was a really deep talkingdiscussion, because he hadoes not have experience as a developer, so he did not know why we hasve a different workflow. It was a really deep discussion, because he does not have experience as a developer, so he did not know why we have a different workflow.

“discussion” for natural phrasing. “does not have experience” for natural phrasing. “we have” for subject-verb agreement.

In my opionion this situation pointed that developer and a project manager too closer to each other, this closes casuses damaged in product. In my opinion this situation pointed that developer and a project manager too close to each other causes damaged in product.

In my opionion this situation pointedhighlights that the developer and a project manager are working too closer to each other, and this closes casues damaged in productproximity disrupts each others work. In my opinion this situation highlights that the developer and project manager are working too close to each other and this proximity disrupts each others work.

- It was a bit unclear what you were trying to say so I did my best to rewrite it with what I thought you were trying to say. Let me know in comments if this wasn't what you were trying to say though

In my opionion, this situation pointedut that developer and a project manager too closer to each other, twhis closes casues damaged inch caused damages with the product. In my opinion, this situation put that developer and a project manager too closer to each other, which caused damages with the product.

In my opionion, this situation pointshowed that the developer and athe project manager were too closer to each other, this closes casues damaged into the product. In my opinion, this situation showed that the developer and the project manager were too close to each other, this closes casues damaged to the product.

Spelling correction for "opinion." “showed that”, “too close”, “this closeness caused damage” for natural phrasing.

We wanted a best for the company, but we have a different approaches in this situation. We wanted a best for the company, but we have a different approaches in this situation.

We wanted aboth want the best for the company, but we have a different approaches into this situation. We both want the best for the company, but we have a different approaches to this situation.

- Wanted is the past tense but I presume you both currently still want what is best for the company - fixed some minor spelling

We wanted athe best for the company, but we have a different approaches into this situation. We wanted the best for the company, but we have different approaches to this situation.

We never use "a" with something plural.

We wanted athe best for the company, but we have a different approaches in this situation. We wanted the best for the company, but we have different approaches in this situation.

“the best.” for natural phrasing. “different approaches” is the correct spelling. Past tense “had” matches the situation described.